Intel on FTC Deal: We Didn't Do Anything Wrong

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Marcus Yam served as Tom's Hardware News Director during 2008-2014. He entered tech media in the late 90s and fondly remembers the days when an overclocked Celeron 300A and Voodoo2 SLI comprised a gaming rig with the ultimate street cred.
  • Jerky_san
    It still doesn't change the fact that it was a slap on the wrist.. And the fact that they purposely slowed down AMD processors compared to their own only makes it worse.. Its the worst type of cheating since programmers and consumers rely on competition to keep the world going round.. I am wanting to use the new AMD magna cores for a VM system but there are still people in our IT department that go on the lines that Intel is better and always will be..
    Reply
  • accolite
    Playing the I'm not guilty routine, but paying the fine or settlement means they are guilty...
    Reply
  • rohitbaran
    Hah, since when does a corporation like Intel admits its mistakes? One has to have guts like Valve to do that.
    Reply
  • grieve
    wow did'nt i read almost this exact line in a HP statement two articles ago?

    ""While Intel and the FTC have agreed to resolve that dispute, Intel is not admitting to any violation of the law nor does it agree with the allegations contained in the complaint," the company said in a statement."


    **cough**GUILTY**cough**
    Reply
  • grieve
    My mistake, the HP article was posted yesterday, i read it two articles ago...
    not that it matters, there both guilty.

    Reply
  • hellwig
    Give it a couple minutes, and Intel will find new ways to be anticompetitive.

    Seriously, if Intel spent as much effort on improving their product as they do trying to screw over their competitors, there'd be no need to screw over AMD and Nvidia. They got lazy, resting on their crappy P3/P4 architecture, and thats why AMD beat them (architecturally) between 2003-2006. Not because they weren't giving manufacturers enough "incentives". How about the fact that their on-chip graphics suck? Maybe in Larrabee were more than just a pipe dream, they could compete with Nvidia chipsets. No, instead they just lock Nvidia out of the chipset market, rather than improve their own offering. And dropping PCI-E to force out all graphics competitors, wow, that's a whole new level of corporate douchiness I hadn't even contemplated. What happens after 2016? We get Intel Express Bus, with heavy licensing fees?

    Oh, and crap, I blamed Marcus for this article by Tuan : http://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-intel-cpu,7837.html. Sorry Marcus.
    Reply
  • danhitchcock
    hahah i love corporate drama. Nvidia competes with Ati, AMD competes with intel, nvidia hates intel, but nvidia can't be friends with AMD because AMD is ati....

    i'm not saying intel is guilty or not guilty of bad business practice, but maybe AMD could actually do there part and maybe advertise. they need to get there name out there
    Reply
  • Poisoner
    This sucks because we need nvidia chipsets
    Reply
  • falchard
    This may set bad precedence. Next up to bat, nVidia with its closed proprietary technology and .cg shader language that purposely makes competing hardware run bad while they bribe developers to use their technology.
    Reply
  • TeraMedia
    I don't see how Intel cannot be accused of monopolistic behavior w.r.t. their Nehalem chipsets. Refusing to license other companies to create Nehalem-compatible chipsets is certainly no better than embedding your browser in your O/S.

    Somehow, I'm not sure that Liebowitz understands the significance of that particular item.
    Reply