Gionee Elife: Hands-on the Thinnest Smartphone in the World

Last week, Gionee announced the world's thinnest smartphone, the Elife S5.5. Measuring 5.5 mm, the device has to be seen to be believed, so we headed to Gionee's booth this morning to see it for ourselves. No doubt about it, this device is extremely thin and is absolutely gorgeous to boot. Packed into that super slim package is a quad-core CPU clocked to 1.7 GHz, 2 GB of RAM, a 5-inch display, a 13-megapixel camera in the back, a 5-megapixel camera up front, and a 2300 mAh battery.

Interestingly, the form factor of this device was not the most intriguing thing about it. While we went to check out the hardware, we were really curious about the software once we unlocked the phone. The Gionee Elife S5.5 is based on Android 4.2. That's a bit disappointing in itself, given we're already on Android 4.4, but users likely wouldn't have a clue they're running a version of Android that's two releases old. There are some serious customizations here. This goes beyond your regular UI that you see skinned on top of Android on other devices. Gionee is targeting young people with the Elife S5.5, so the company wanted to really give Android a young flavor. The end result is a UI that looks very unlike Android; it is flatter, sleeker and overall more visually appealing.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

Watch full video here:

In its current form, Android isn't the best looking mobile OS out there. That isn't necessarily a bad thing, as it gives phone manufacturers a little bit of room to customize the Android experience without butchering Google's work too much, but we often end up with hodgepodge UIs that try to aim more for a branded experience as opposed to an improved one. With Gionee's Amigo, simple changes, like a visual representation of used and available app storage, give the OS a more polished feel.

As far as the device itself goes, the S5.5 is rather angular in the hand. The corners of the device feel a bit harsh, and while all the edges are beveled, we would have preferred if they were outright curved instead. That aside, the phone is truly beautiful; the only complaint we have is that anyone buying this phone would likely slap a case on it and completely obstruct the beauty of the device. Luckily, the S5.5 isn't just a pretty face, so the custom UI isn't going to be affected by how you choose to dress your phone.

The bad news is that if you're in the U.S., you're not going to get to see this device. At least not for a while. We dropped by the Gionee booth today to check out the S5.5 and talk to a rep about U.S. availability. The device is already available in China and is launching in India next month. In last week's announcement, the company said it was planning to launch in 40 countries. Unfortunately, if the U.S. is one of them, it won't get the phone this year. A Gionee rep we spoke to said it might consider tapping the U.S. market in 2015, but he made it sound like those plans aren't set in stone.

TOPICS

Jane McEntegart is a writer, editor, and marketing communications professional with 17 years of experience in the technology industry. She has written about a wide range of technology topics, including smartphones, tablets, and game consoles. Her articles have been published in Tom's Guide, Tom's Hardware, MobileSyrup, and Edge Up.

4 Comments Comment from the forums

CaedenV

So... other than for a company to say "we did it" what exactly is the point of these ultra slim devices? I own a Lumia 920, so I understand the need to slim down and loose weight a bit on a phone... but I cannot imagine a real need for a phone to be any thinner than something like an iPhone or an HTC One.It is kind of like the thin display movement. Yes, we all appreciated the move from CRTs to flat panels... and we all appreciated the move from 2" thick TVs to something thin and light enough to hang on a wall fairly easily. But we are at a point today where the thickness of devices is no longer a selling point.I mean, I would rather have a slightly thicker phone that has 2-3 day battery, or decent thermal dissipation, or more/faster storage, or trim the bezel down to nothing. These are all selling points now. So long as the thickness is not horribly thick, you no longer need to be the slimmest device on the market to be the 'best'.
Reply
back_by_demand

Wax all you want about wanting a longer battery for extra thickness, you may as well stick with a brick, somebody will always want the thinnest and lightest in a particular screen size. The best dumb phone I ever owned was a Samsung U100 and at 5.9mm was the worlds thinnest phone at that time, this is even thinner and it wont stop there, eventually someone will make the "Iron Man" phone which is just a bezel with glass in the middle. My bet is on Samsung doing it first.
Reply
maddad

"Luckily, the S5.5 isn't just a pretty face"If the specifications posted on the Web are correct. That's all this phone is, just another pretty face. No wireless, no gps, no bluetooth, no DLNA. All the reviewer did was hold the phone and look at the screen. And yet he makes it sound like everyone should run out and buy it just on looks alone!
Reply
Master467

"Luckily, the S5.5 isn't just a pretty face"If the specifications posted on the Web are correct. That's all this phone is, just another pretty face. No wireless, no gps, no bluetooth, no DLNA. All the reviewer did was hold the phone and look at the screen. And yet he makes it sound like everyone should run out and buy it just on looks alone!
He? look at those nails.
Reply