Google Gets Umbrella Patent For Cloud Operating Systems

The patent is entitled "Network based operating system across devices" and was filed in March of 2009, about two months before Chrome OS was officially announced. What makes this patent special is the fact that it covers virtual all aspects of "providing an operating system over a network to a local device" in a manner that would apply to any cloud OS that uses software other than a web browser. And even the web browser, as an entity that is regularly updated and would, conceivably, fill the role as operating system framework, would be touched by this patent.

As malicious as this patent may seem, it is more likely that the patent actually reveals Google's intent to tie hardware and software experiences much closer together. If the patent is enforceable and not invalidated due to prior art that could be claimed by Oracle because of its NC and Sun's JavaStation, the patent (as well as the recent buy of Motorola) highlight that Google's software is moving much closer to hardware.

It is somewhat dazzling how Google could get a patent on such a general approach. However, if Google can claim the rights to it, the question would be how Microsoft can react. Essentially, the cloud OS for client computers is now patented.

Create a new thread in the US News comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
33 comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • Au_equus
    If apple can patent shapes and hand gestures...
  • Au_equus
    IMHO we shouldn't be surprised anymore with any sort of ambiguity associated with the US patent system
  • freggo
    US Patent office.
    First they tell us that everything that can be invented has been invented; now they let you patent lint and dust bunnies.

    Maybe they where right after all, everything WORTH patenting has been invented and they just need to come up with reasons to show up for work :-)
  • Other Comments
  • Au_equus
    If apple can patent shapes and hand gestures...
  • amk-aka-Phantom
    Oh, so any thin client would fall under the patent? Well, that's BS.
  • Au_equus
    IMHO we shouldn't be surprised anymore with any sort of ambiguity associated with the US patent system