Deep Learning To Soon Bring Pro-Level Photography To Smartphones

Google researchers have been working on a project in which deep learning is used to create “professional-level photographs.” The project shows that in the near future, all photos could look like they were taken by professionals, and pictures taken with smartphones could benefit the most from this technology over the coming years.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Lucian Armasu is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He covers software news and the issues surrounding privacy and security.

  • Novell SysOp fire phasers 5 time
    Wrong. You need a Quadro card to edit 10-bit color, and a true 10-bit IPS monitor, not some BS scam 8+FRC, and it better be 100% Adobe RGB. Try finding one. Pros take pics in RAW 16-bit format. No damn stupidphone can do that.

    I'll edit this to give you a hint. SONY X300 V2 4K OLED. $45,000, and only 10-bit panel. Dolby has a 12-bit panel. You want the best? You only have 2 choices, and you can't afford either of them.
    Reply
  • Matt_ogu812
    I concur.
    Reply
  • Novell SysOp fire phasers 5 time
    There are only a handful of pro apps that let you edit 10-bit color, and Adobe is the only one the pros use and care about. And you need a Quadro card to do it. Geforce is not allowed. google are full of idiots who dabble in things they know nothing about. google fiber is dead and gone and moved on to Wi-Fi because larry page is a moron and knows nothing about the expense of rolling out fiber. google videos is dead and gone too. Never trust corps or anyone with your data. Pay cloud services have folded overnight and all your info is gone.

    Just who are these "experts" google used to examine these pics? I doubt any of them are pros and none of them have access to or use the $40,000 equipment I listed above. And I can guarantee NONE of you on this forum knew of it either.
    Reply
  • Krazie_Ivan
    i'm just going to downvote Novell till his smugness balances out with his knowledge. knowing stuff is great, nice, but nobody wants to learn from a personality like that.
    Reply
  • CobraMatte
    Does it do selfies?

    If beauty is the only goal, its ok i suppose. It seems strange that the edited pictures no longer accurately depict what you took a picture of.
    Reply
  • hannibal
    Heh! Take picture of chetto and dying people and the AI change that to "Bold and beatifull" with luxury cars!
    Photo manipulation in a big way ;)
    Reply
  • msroadkill612
    Big hit with; estate agents, used cars, dating sites, tourism in war zones, the mid west & texas, investment brochures,...
    Reply
  • derekullo
    19940495 said:
    There are only a handful of pro apps that let you edit 10-bit color, and Adobe is the only one the pros use and care about. And you need a Quadro card to do it. Geforce is not allowed. google are full of idiots who dabble in things they know nothing about. google fiber is dead and gone and moved on to Wi-Fi because larry page is a moron and knows nothing about the expense of rolling out fiber. google videos is dead and gone too. Never trust corps or anyone with your data. Pay cloud services have folded overnight and all your info is gone.

    Just who are these "experts" google used to examine these pics? I doubt any of them are pros and none of them have access to or use the $40,000 equipment I listed above. And I can guarantee NONE of you on this forum knew of it either.

    I have been able to edit 10 bit color per channel in gimp for free for about 2 years.
    https://www.gimp.org/news/2015/11/27/gimp-2-9-2-released/
    Reply
  • Crystalizer
    19940495 said:
    There are only a handful of pro apps that let you edit 10-bit color, and Adobe is the only one the pros use and care about. And you need a Quadro card to do it. Geforce is not allowed. google are full of idiots who dabble in things they know nothing about. google fiber is dead and gone and moved on to Wi-Fi because larry page is a moron and knows nothing about the expense of rolling out fiber. google videos is dead and gone too. Never trust corps or anyone with your data. Pay cloud services have folded overnight and all your info is gone.

    Just who are these "experts" google used to examine these pics? I doubt any of them are pros and none of them have access to or use the $40,000 equipment I listed above. And I can guarantee NONE of you on this forum knew of it either.

    You are making a lot of assumptions.
    1. You think google cannot afford the best professionals?
    2. Because one of the many google features is not successful suddenly it all comes crap?
    3 You also think Google has no cash for professional gear.
    4..You think no one on this forum has no knowledge of what you are talking about.

    And the most funny thing is I think all of those are wrong. That I think makes you either a troll, idiot or a guy who is desperately fighting against this to not lose his job or something by throwing"Impossible I'm pro comments".

    Here is something to think about(you could have asked nicely too you know).
    Even an intermediate programmer is not limited to bits in image processing. An AI programmer involved in deep learning is most often far beyond intermediate. Access to pro equipment can be made using a company's dedicated credit card with approved funding for the project. Google seems to wan't the very best so that should not be a problem. In this case it's easier to just hire a professional photographer with pro equipment.

    5. You should never trust anyone with your personal information! But that would be boring? Why not just lay and die?

    I think using artificial intelligence to enchant images beyond their original scope is great idea. Ai is great at analyzing and processing. So it shouldn't be a problem to use shapes and some color information to make even better images. Human has powerful imagination and teaching deep learning ai to make images beyond what human can do is like winning another chess against humans. If you have tons of 10 bit hdr images to get data from where do you need an expensive camera when you can just fake it until you can't know about it. Scary isn't it, or is it? Not for me at least.

    Have a nice day. It seems like you need it!
    Reply
  • peterf28
    we live in virtual reality, in a simulation , humans were created by some more advancen civilisation
    Reply