Following Printer DRM Fiasco, HP Needs To Do More To Fix Reputation, Says EFF

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Lucian Armasu is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He covers software news and the issues surrounding privacy and security.

  • Jake Hall
    Horrible company
    Reply
  • chicofehr
    Reminds me of DRM on coffee makers. The pirating groups should release a firmware that removes the DRM. Always update manually if you can :P
    Reply
  • clonazepam
    Epson went through similar issues almost two decades ago, with having electronic chips built into their ink cartridges, in an attempt to block the use of 3rd party inks. They all try to get away with whatever they can.
    Reply
  • anbello262
    I don't know about a few decades ago, but Epson is definitely doing this exactly now. They block by DRM unofficial ink systems.
    Reply
  • HEKT1K
    HP printers have always been notoriously unreliable, something I can not tolerate when I need to print a report for the next days. Most HP printers I've had have broke in 2-4 months.

    My Canon and Brother printers are rock solid after years of service.
    Reply
  • Hydrotricithline
    You want people to buy your ink.. either make it economical or superior. Cannon for example. People don't buy their lenses printers and ink (being overpriced) because they're shitty. You want people to use your ink, make better ink, or make it cheaper. Don't sell some 25$ printer with 400$usd a year maintenance in ink then think you can just lock them into your run of the mill over priced ink. Glad this ruling went down. I personally don't use 'refills' myself because the ink sucks.. but you know what.. I'd like that option.. especially for blacks where provided it's not faded or 'blueish' it's pretty hard to get completely wrong.
    Reply
  • tommatthews1951
    This article would be far better if the author expanded all of these abbreviations the first time they were used. Not everyone is familiar with these and the article would have been far more meaningful to me had an attempt been to use the unabbreviated version first.
    Reply
  • captaincharisma
    they haven't done anything to fix it in over a century so why would they start now?
    Reply
  • cheesemanx
    On this particular case I am siding with HP, we have lost 2 printers in my company for 3rd party ink that have destroyed the devices and when I have a site out in the middle of nowhere and I have to drive 4 hours each way to replace a broken printer because some scantily clad woman talked the site manager into buy crummy 3rd party ink, then yes I would have liked the device to not print with anything other original HP ink.
    Reply
  • ikaz
    Cheesemanx Sorry you work for a company that has crappy employees I work in IT for a large company (mutli site, region, ect) any time the department "Breaks" equipment because of misuse it's charged back to the department. Then they have to explain why they are over budget at the end of the year.

    I have no problem with HP say warning that using non-HP ink can say void warrentee but that should be up to the end user who purchased the device to make the decision.
    Reply