Apple Drops iPod Touch and Nano Prices

33

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Jane McEntegart
Contributor

Jane McEntegart is a writer, editor, and marketing communications professional with 17 years of experience in the technology industry. She has written about a wide range of technology topics, including smartphones, tablets, and game consoles. Her articles have been published in Tom's Guide, Tom's Hardware, MobileSyrup, and Edge Up.

  • Arguggi
    Why the F**k should i have a camera on my Digital Audio Player? I would really prefer support to codecs like Ogg, Flac, Mpc ecc ecc.
    Reply
  • backbydemand
    Good point, please support more audio codecs

    Only bother with a camera if you are going to put an optical zoom on it
    Reply
  • naterandrews
    Peculiar. Apple typically does not include older versions of their products in their typical line up after a refresh. This makes me wonder if the new versions will just be minor refreshes with a camera, and thats it? Has Apple finally hit the peverbial brick wall with iPod advancements?
    Reply
  • MonteCarlo
    Wow for $30 more you can go from the 16 to 32 gig itouch. You would be stupid to get the 16 gig now.
    Reply
  • doomtomb
    Lol, don't wait for the camera just get the cheaper one!
    Reply
  • The Dark Wall
    Hmm... still not sure that an iGrenade is worth $280. Still needs work before I get my hands on one.
    Reply
  • Not seeing this reflected anywhere yet... wonder how long it will take Amazon, etc. to ship them for even less...
    Reply
  • jellico
    They're probably trying to grab a little more market share before the Zune HD debuts next week and blows them out of the water.
    Reply
  • bigalfantasy2004
    Given a choice I would purchase the new Zune HD.
    Reply
  • duckmanx88
    a camera is so retarded. arguggi is right. its a frigging music player. but a radio receiver on the ipod.

    and these price points are retarded. only $30 difference between 16 and 32GB?
    Reply