Intel Details XeSS Quality Mode With GDC Demos

Intel Xe tech slides from GDC 2022
(Image credit: Intel)

Intel has shared its Xe Super Sampling (XeSS) video session and presentation deck from this year's Game Developers Conference (GDC) in San Francisco, revealing some new morsels of information among  some facts that we already knew. There's also a deep dive into how XeSS works its upscaling magic. Intel execs and developers showed the upscaling tech in action and, of course, provided some comparative performance charts.

Intel hosted several sessions at GDC on Wednesday and there are more scheduled for today. The session we are highlighting here was hosted by Robert Kawiak, a graphics software engineer at Intel. After introducing XeSS and the design decisions behind it, Kawiak looked at some of its appealing qualities vs established and modern rival technologies.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • tennis2
    The key thing to remember about Intel XeSS is that it is an AI-based Super Sampling technique for real time rendering that doesn't need per-title training.
    This suggests is a driver-level implementation? (ie RSR)

    At the time of writing we don't have an ETA for the launch of XeSS or any games that will work with this new upscaler.
    Wait....what? If they're not ALL supported, then this suggests it's an in-game setting implementation. (ie FSR/DLSS)

    It is optimized for Xe GPUs in that it will perform best with the Arc Alchemist Xe Matrix Extensions (Intel XMX) but it also runs using DX12 SM6.4+ and DP4a intrinsic support on other GPU architectures. That makes it cross platform and hardware agnostic, and Intel says that the SDK will be open sourced.
    Reply
  • deesider
    For developers looks like a better option than DLSS and FSR.

    Works on all hardware unlike DLSS, but probably better quality than FSR - so easiest to just implement XeSS and be done with it.
    Reply
  • tennis2
    We are indeed at a point where the ecosystem can't tolerate 3 proprietary solutions to the same problem.
    Reply
  • hotaru.hino
    deesider said:
    Works on all hardware unlike DLSS, but probably better quality than FSR - so easiest to just implement XeSS and be done with it.
    If I'm going to be snide here, I'd also argue that Intel has better software support than AMD. Or at least has more money to throw at it.
    Reply
  • renz496
    tennis2 said:
    This suggests is a driver-level implementation? (ie RSR)

    not. implementation wise it will be similar to nvidia DLSS 2.

    deesider said:
    For developers looks like a better option than DLSS and FSR.

    Works on all hardware unlike DLSS, but probably better quality than FSR - so easiest to just implement XeSS and be done with it.

    the article itself mention that the best version of XeSS will take advantage of intel XMX instruction that is exclusive to intel hardware. in other words it will run on intel version of tensor core inside those Arc GPU. non intel GPU will fall back to DX12 DP4a instruction. yes XeSS will be cross platform but the best version with the best performance uplift will always run on intel hardware only. and for this reason alone it will not going to deter both nvidia and AMD to push their solution to be used in games.
    Reply