Intel Medfield Phones Selling Only in Limited Numbers

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Douglas Perry
Contributor

Douglas Perry was a freelance writer for Tom's Hardware covering semiconductors, storage technology, quantum computing, and processor power delivery. He has authored several books and is currently an editor for The Oregonian/OregonLive.

  • rb420
    I, for one, welcome our new mobile processor overlords.
    Reply
  • mayankleoboy1
    ^
    ??
    Reply
  • rflynn88
    Intel making SoCs = more competition. Nothing wrong with that.
    Reply
  • hoofhearted
    I'd be more interested in hard numbers, specifically, benchmarks.
    Reply
  • annymmo
    The 22nm and 14nm generations will be very interesting.
    Reply
  • house70
    Hardly anyone ever heard of them. On top of that, the only benchmark available for the San Diego model is not very flattering (against SGS3), but somewhat better than Droid Razr. It needs to be head and shoulders above the competition for people to start paying attention to a new player. There are still no benchmarks available regarding battery life, and the launch with GB instead of ICS pretty much killed it before birth.
    I appreciate Intel's desire to get into the game, but they can do waaaay better than this, given their reputation and their financial power. Not to mention the lack of promotion, even worse than WinPhone.
    Reply
  • spookyman
    Does it run DROID?
    Reply
  • house70, anand had tests of battery life and performance. Performance was great. Only 2 ARM based phones were faster, but those 2 also had no where near Intel's battery life. Performance per minute of battery life was definitely in Intel's favor. I think the BG vs. ICS issue is real. Intel just really needs to get more up to date. Get baseband functionality integrated, get to 22nm, and get a dual core version out. That will get people's attention. A single core CPU with old software on an old process is just not going to get anyone excited, even though the performance is excellent and the battery life is good. I see Intel being a player in mid to late 2013 when they have these features.
    Reply
  • jayracer7474
    they cant sell any orange's because they're locked bootloader, cant barely even root them
    Reply
  • Kraszmyl
    anandtech has a pretty good review for them.

    The intel soc even being single core trounces the various dual core arm socs and comes close to the quads. The gpu preformance is alot more varied. Battery was average if i recall correctly.

    The intel soc has an arm converter built in if i recall correctly so you can run most non x86 android apps if the built in andriod translator doesnt take care of it already.

    All in all its a fairly solid offering and i look forward to seeing what comes out of both companies because of it.
    Reply