Microsoft’s sketchy Win 10 vs Win 11 performance claims pit a 9-year-old PC against a modern machine to claim 2.3X gain

Windows 11
(Image credit: Microsoft)

Ever since Microsoft announced that it would end support for Windows 10 in October, the company has been trying hard to convince users to make the switch to Windows 11. First, it warned that unsupported Windows 10 PCs will no longer receive security updates, making them easy targets for hackers. Later, it advised users to trade in their old computers and buy a new one that comes preloaded with all the Windows 11 goodies.

Now, once again, Microsoft’s Executive Vice President and Consumer Chief Marketing Officer, Yusuf Mehdi, has published a fresh blog highlighting all the benefits and advantages of Windows 11, including a statement claiming that Windows 11 PCs are up to 2.3 times faster than Windows 10 PCs. However, what they failed to make clear is that this claim is entirely based on a comparison of new versus old hardware, rather than the software itself.

The claim is based on benchmarking results from the Geekbench 6 Multi-Core measurement tool. When you follow the link provided in the footnote, it reads, “Based on testing performed by Microsoft in December 2024 using Geekbench 6 Multi-core score comparing a selection of Windows 10 PCs with Intel Core 6th, 8th, and 10th generation processors and Windows 11 PCs with Intel Core 12th and 13th generation processors. Performance will vary significantly by device and with settings, usage, and other factors.”

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Windows 10 PCs powered by old Intel chips

Device

Model

Processor

Windows 10 - Device 1

Dell Inspiron 7590

Intel Core i7-8565U CPU @ 1.80GHz

Windows 10 - Device 2

Dell Inspiron 3580

Intel Core i7-8565U CPU @ 1.80GHz

Windows 10 - Device 3

HP Envyx360

Intel Core i7-1065G7 CPU @ 1.30GHz

Windows 10 - Device 4

HP Laptop 15

11th Gen Intel Core i5-1135G7 @ 2.40GHz

Windows 10 - Device 5

Dell XPS 13

Intel Core i5-8200Y CPU @ 1.30GHz

Windows 10 - Device 6

Dell Inspiron 5379

Intel Core i5-8250U CPU @ 1.60GHz

Windows 10 - Device 7

HP Spectre x360

Intel Core i7-8750H CPU @ 2.20GHz

Windows 10 - Device 8

Dell Inspiron 7300

Intel Core i5-10210U CPU @ 1.60GHz

Windows 10 - Device 9

Dell Inspiron 7353

Intel Core i3-6100U CPU @ 2.30GHz

Windows 10 - Device 10

Dell XPS 13

Intel Core i5-6200U CPU @ 2.30GHz

This makes it very clear that Microsoft didn’t test Windows 10 on machines running Windows 11, or vice versa. Instead, it relied on a synthetic benchmark that measures explicitly a CPU’s multicore performance to draw conclusions about the software. And that’s not even the worst part. The real issue is that all the Windows 10 systems used in the test are powered by CPUs from seven to nine years ago, while the Windows 11 machines feature chips from 2022 or later. Hard to call that a proper comparison.

Windows 11 isn’t 2.3X faster, the hardware is

It's no mystery that benchmark results can often be misleading, as they don’t entirely reflect real-world usage. It's been shown that Windows 10 can offer better gaming performance than Windows 11. However, not everyone knows that, especially the average Windows user, and for them, these “false performance claims” could easily lead them to believe their PC will be much faster with Windows 11, which hopefully isn’t the direction Microsoft is aiming for.

The blog post also argues in favor of upgrading to Windows 11 by highlighting increased security through features like TPM 2.0 and Smart App Control, as well as a 62 percent reduction in security incidents with Windows 11. However, that comparison is based on new computers running Windows 11 versus older computers running Windows 10.

That being said, for those who cannot or don’t want to upgrade to Windows 11, the Extended Security Updates (ESU) subscription keeps your Windows 10 PC secure for a fee of $30 per year. Alternatively, you can try making Windows 11 look and feel like Windows 10.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Hassam Nasir
Contributing Writer

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

  • TerryLaze
    Admin said:
    Microsoft claims that Windows 11 is 2.3 times faster than Windows 10, but fails to mention that the comparison is based entirely on new hardware versus old.
    Actual claim from the site:
    "In fact, Windows 11 PCs are up to 2.3x faster than Windows 10 PCs."

    windows 11 is 2.3X faster than... is a different claim from windows 11 PCs are 2.3X faster than...

    Yes the wording and where they placed this piece of information is very deceptive, still, anybody that can read can understand what they said.
    Reply
  • coolitic
    Deceptive marketing that goes off of a small technicality to avoid being sued.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Microsoft just asking to be debunked by a tech review website.
    and then to rub salt into their self inflicted wound, add a light weight linux distro or two.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    Notton said:
    add a light weight linux distro or two.
    Sure, as long as you compare it to windows safe mode, since that's pretty much the level of functionality you get out of a light weight distro without adding everything back in.
    Reply
  • Notton
    TerryLaze said:
    Sure, as long as you compare it to windows safe mode, since that's pretty much the level of functionality you get out of a light weight distro without adding everything back in.
    I was thinking Mint!, which is definitely on par with the full version of Win7/8/10, but only requiring 8GB RAM to run.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    Notton said:
    I was thinking Mint!, which is definitely on par with the full version of Win7/8/10, but only requiring 8GB RAM to run.
    Let's not have this fight yet again.....
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    and they didnt even pick decent processors that old..

    this is why we need laws agasint spreading disinformation by making claism that are deceptive by nature hiding details.
    Should be required ot put the caveats at start in large print.
    Reply
  • Rabohinf
    There's no way Microsoft would lie or misrepresent, right guys? Terry?
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    Rabohinf said:
    There's no way Microsoft would lie or misrepresent, right guys? Terry?
    Everybody does it, you included. I'm 100% sure your real life name is robohinf...
    Reply
  • derekullo
    My Xigmanas 12.2.0.4 is at least 1000 times better at serving files than Windows 11 Home.

    If I'm allowed to move the goal posts :P
    Reply