Microsoft's own AI chip delayed six months in major setback — in-house chip now reportedly expected in 2026, but won't hold a candle to Nvidia Blackwell

Microsoft headquarters logo
(Image credit: Getty Images / NurPhoto)

A new report claims that despite having spent years designing its own AI chips, Microsoft's first in-house silicon offering has been delayed by six months. Furthermore, when it finally does launch in 2026, it will reportedly fall short of the performance of Nvidia's Blackwell chips, according to The Information.

A new report claims Microsoft's chip is taking much longer than expected, which will amplify the gulf in performance to Nvidia Blackwell, making them even less competitive by the time the chips go into production.

Microsoft is reportedly working on three chips behind the scenes, dubbed Braga, Braga-R, and Clea, targeting data center deployment in 2025, 2026, and 2027, respectively. The delay of the former casts doubt on whether Microsoft will meet this ambitious launch target. The Information reports that all three chips are designed for inference — a separate chip designed for training AI models was reportedly cancelled in early 2024.

TOPICS
Stephen Warwick
News Editor

Stephen is Tom's Hardware's News Editor with almost a decade of industry experience covering technology, having worked at TechRadar, iMore, and even Apple over the years. He has covered the world of consumer tech from nearly every angle, including supply chain rumors, patents, and litigation, and more. When he's not at work, he loves reading about history and playing video games.

  • John Nemesh
    Whoever at MS thought this was a good idea needs to be fired. Why on EARTH would a software company start designing AI chips when they have ZERO experience with chip design???? Moronic.
    Reply
  • Notton
    I found the "high turnover rate" part hilarious.
    That's the one thing you should never do when designing a chip from the ground up.
    You only fire engineers after the product is complete, not before, lol.
    Reply
  • EzzyB
    John Nemesh said:
    Whoever at MS thought this was a good idea needs to be fired. Why on EARTH would a software company start designing AI chips when they have ZERO experience with chip design???? Moronic.
    They already have their own ARM-based chips in production for their datacenters.
    Reply
  • John Nemesh
    EzzyB said:
    They already have their own ARM-based chips in production for their datacenters.
    Yeah, that's not at all similar. And modifying a LICENSED design and making tweaks isn't remotely the same as designing a new chip architecture from the ground up.
    Reply
  • Xaction
    Interesting reporting since the original date floated for these chips last year was 2026, not 2025
    Reply
  • phead128
    John Nemesh said:
    Whoever at MS thought this was a good idea needs to be fired. Why on EARTH would a software company start designing AI chips when they have ZERO experience with chip design???? Moronic.
    Are you saying only hardware companies with chip manufacturing experience should design chips?
    Reply
  • alrighty_then
    MSFT stock down just 0.45% today...so this news is either inaccurate or no one cared. Meanwhile NVIDIA and MSFT continue to compete to be the most insanely profitable companies to invest in - and I'm loving it.

    I was disappointed that MSFT did so well with the Surface line then stopped innovating, (to avoid competing with partners I suppose). Their hardware efforts are hit-and-miss but some of the hits are/were impressive (Xbox, Surface, HoloLens).
    Reply
  • Pierce2623
    EzzyB said:
    They already have their own ARM-based chips in production for their datacenters.
    Yeah but building a CPU with ARM cores is different from building an AI accelerator. Quite different.
    Reply
  • umeng2002_2
    The common denominator is people are tired of buying from nVidia™. How Nintendo is still doing business with them is beyond me.
    Reply
  • atmapuri
    If deepSeek has show that you can achieve a 10x speed up with software optimization, why are people so keen on making hardware?
    Hardware development is projected to cost less than software optimization?

    Or only programmers in China cost less?
    Reply