Purported Intel Core i7-14700K Benchmarks up to 20% Faster in Multi-Threaded Workloads

Intel Raptor Lake CPUs
(Image credit: Intel)

A seasoned Twitter-based hardware leaker has shared a screenshot which seems to show the results of an Intel Core i7-14700K put through a trio of benchmarks. WXnod shared a screenshot a few hours ago, without comment, and in it you can see that the supposed Raptor Lake Refresh chip has been tested in AIDA64, Cinebench, and CPU-Z. Compared to its predecessor, the Core i7 13700K, the new chip appears to be as much as 20% faster in multi-threaded workloads.

(Image credit: WXnod)

The Intel Core i7-14700K is a expected to be a particularly interesting member of Raptor Lake Refresh as, according to the latest information, it is unique in delivering a reconfigured core spec. To explain that, while its predecessor offered an 8P + 8E core configuration, the refreshed model is rumored to come with 8P + 12E. WXnod's leak has all core configuration details blurred out, for some reason. However, fellow Twitter hardware tipster Harukaze5719 has ridden to our rescue, augmenting this leak with a Baidu-sourced screenshot complete with core configuration data. See below.

Working through the on-screen data, we can see that the chip which is under is identified by the software as a Raptor Lake-S model, for the LGA 1700 socket, fabricated using 10 nm lithography (Intel 7), which boosts up to 5.5 GHz in this example, and has a TDP of 125W.

Raptor Lake Refresh sysinfo

(Image credit: Harukaze5719)

The screenshot purportedly shows that the Intel Core i7-14700K offers a base clock of 3.40 GHz, and a core configuration detected as offering 20C / 28T. This fits with 8P + 12E cores (16 + 12 threads).

Circling back to the original info spill from WXnod, we have to assume that the benchmarks are genuine, accurate and representative (but taken with a pinch of salt), and create a comparison table. Data for the Core i7-13700K comes from our review (linked) and online databases. 

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Intel Core

i7-13700K

i7-14700K

AIDA64 read (GB/s)

94

113.7

Cinebench 1T

2107

2192

Cinebench nT

30880

36296

CPU-Z 1T

864

908

CPU-Z nT

12430

14988

From the memory test results (AIDA64) we can see an alleged and significant uplift in bandwidth, but this could be helped by a system with a newer motherboard and different RAM module choices. Moving onto Cinebench, and while single-core tests aren't much different, the expected extra cores / threads in this Raptor Lake Refresh CPU show their worth. The same can be said for CPU-Z 1T and nT processor testing. At best, the processor multithread tests show that the i7-14700K is 20.6% faster in CPU-Z, and up to 17.5% faster in Cinebench, compared to the previous gen CPU.

If you are running an Intel socket LGA 1700 system and could be tempted to upgrade to a Raptor Lake Refresh chip, you shouldn't have to wait a very long time, as the 'K' chips are tipped to arrive in mid-to-late October. However, there are indications that the Core i7-14700K (in particular) might need users to apply a BIOS update, to get it working correctly.

Mark Tyson
Freelance News Writer

Mark Tyson is a Freelance News Writer at Tom's Hardware US. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • Diabl0
    I don't like that. How many programs support 20 cores? My 6 core Ryzen is not fully utilized.
    Reply
  • Eximo
    Diabl0 said:
    I don't like that. How many programs support 20 cores? My 6 core Ryzen is not fully utilized.

    Well that design came out with 12th gen, so it has been around a while and seems to work pretty well now. Light tasks run on the efficiency cores leaving the high speed cores available for what is needed. And then you have a lot of them for when multithreaded workloads are run.

    Ryzen offers 16 cores 32 thread on the desktop as well, not like that thread count is exactly new either in desktop or on older workstation CPUs.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    Jeesh, 1.8W at idle?! Is that similar to the 13700?
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    Diabl0 said:
    I don't like that. How many programs support 20 cores? My 6 core Ryzen is not fully utilized.
    As long as people buy it makers will make it, just look at the ridiculous GPUs we have today.
    At least with intel it's pretty sure that they will make a complete lineup down to celerons so you can buy whatever level of compute you want to.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    More Cinebench Accelerators!

    Regards :P
    Reply
  • Brian D Smith
    Diabl0 said:
    I don't like that. How many programs support 20 cores? My 6 core Ryzen is not fully utilized.
    The one I use can use as many cores/threads as you can throw at it! Which...is why I'm eyeing an AMD 16 core right now.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    TerryLaze said:
    At least with intel it's pretty sure that they will make a complete lineup down to celerons
    Didn't Intel kill the Celeron branding? I'm looking at what I think is the entire Alder Lake-N range and there's not a Celeron in sight:
    https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/codename/232598/products-formerly-alder-laken.html
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    That cpu is twice fast than my current 13500t.... :)
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    TerryLaze said:
    As long as people buy it makers will make it, just look at the ridiculous GPUs we have today.
    20-years low sales with prices finally crashing on several models to prop up sales doesn't sound like people are rushing to buy disappointing overpriced new stuff.
    Reply
  • Zerk2012
    bit_user said:
    Didn't Intel kill the Celeron branding? I'm looking at what I think is the entire Alder Lake-N range and there's not a Celeron in sight:
    https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/codename/232598/products-formerly-alder-laken.html
    Yes they stopped that
    Reply