Nanoantennas Can Change Phase of Light

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Douglas Perry
Contributor

Douglas Perry was a freelance writer for Tom's Hardware covering semiconductors, storage technology, quantum computing, and processor power delivery. He has authored several books and is currently an editor for The Oregonian/OregonLive.

  • Esto si es muy impresionante...sera la nueva era?
    Reply
  • jackbling
    Love to see a law broken; I like to think it stimulates the imagination of researchers in the relevant field, it has to be invigorating to have that barrier lifted.

    Even tho in this case it would appear they just amended the law.
    Reply
  • rawful
    What is a negative angle?
    Reply
  • doomgaze3
    How soon until I can buy an invisibility cloak?
    Reply
  • Haserath
    rawfulWhat is a negative angle?An angle greater than the angle of refraction, I would assume.

    Refraction is based on the speed of light through a medium.
    Reply
  • jgutz2006
    jackblingLove to see a law broken; Theft included? :-)
    Reply
  • sseyler
    jackblingLove to see a law broken; I like to think it stimulates the imagination of researchers in the relevant field, it has to be invigorating to have that barrier lifted.Even tho in this case it would appear they just amended the law.jackblingLove to see a law broken; I like to think it stimulates the imagination of researchers in the relevant field, it has to be invigorating to have that barrier lifted.Even tho in this case it would appear they just amended the law.
    Snell's law was never "broken". Snell's law is based on classical models of the behavior of light at interfaces. Saying "Snell's law was broken (by Purdue researchers)" is a statement that shows a profound misunderstanding of physics being talked about. I'm not blaming people for misunderstanding, because much of the fault of scientific ignorance and confusing is a consequence of poor reporting and communication. Albeit things like this point to a gross lack of scientific literacy among the general public.
    Reply
  • kronos_cornelius
    I am totally ignorant about this. But sounds interesting. Can Mr. Perry extend the article to review what Snell's law is, why sseyler thinks no law was broken, and what he means by a negative angle ?

    I'll come back to this article later to check.. meanwhile I'll check if TR and Wired for more info on this.
    Reply
  • @kronos_cornelius
    Negative refraction index:
    http://www.rikenresearch.riken.jp/images/figures/hi_3837.jpg
    Reply
  • freggo
    frozonichttp://d37nnnqwv9amwr.cloudfront.n 751942.pngthats all we need to do
    Well, NASA is actually using that on a few probes out there !
    Reply