Ryzen Z1 Extreme Beats Core i5-10600K, Apple M1 in Cinebench R23

Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Image credit: AMD)

AMD's Ryzen Z1 series isn't far from being one of the best CPUs; however, the Zen 4-powered chips do wonders for handheld gaming devices, such as the ROG Ally, the primary rival to the Steam Deck. Despite being processors that consume no more than 30W, the Ryzen Z1 series can rival some desktop processors as long as the latter is a few generations old.

If you haven't been following the gaming handheld scene, the Ryzen Z1 Extreme is AMD's highest-performing processor for handheld devices. Wielding the latest Zen 4 cores, the Ryzen Z1 Extreme has eight cores, 16 threads, and respectable clock speeds to brag about. The octa-core chip has a 3.3 GHz base clock and a boost clock that hits 5.1 GHz. Nonetheless, Ryzen Z1 Extreme's RDNA 3-based integrated graphics is mainly responsible for the chip's graphics prowess. It features 12 RDNA 3 compute units at 2.7 GHz.

While other ROG Ally owners are busy gaming, Twitter user Mochamad Farido Fanani has benchmarked the Ryzen Z1 Extreme with Cinebench R23, providing a reference for comparison to see how much processing power is inside the tiny Zen 4 chip. The Ryzen Z1 Extreme inside the ROG ally has access to 16GB (2x8GB) of LPDDR5-6400 memory.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
ProcessorMulti CoreSingle Core
Core i5-13600K23,0502,007
M2 Max (MacBook Pro)14,7971,620
Ryzen Z1 Extreme10,8181,676
Apple M1 (Mac Mini)7,8331,522
Core i5-10600K9,2211,268

The Ryzen Z1 Extreme delivered 32% and 17% higher single-and multi-core performance than the Core i5-10600K. It's an impressive feat on one hand because the Ryzen Z1 Extreme is a 30W, reportedly running at 15W, while the Core i5-10600K is a 125W processor. That's a significant delta in TDP. On the other hand, the Core i5-10600K is a three-year-old chip, so it does take away some merit from the Ryzen Z1 Extreme.

It's logical the Ryzen Z1 Extreme cannot compete with a more modern model, like the Core i5-13600K. The margins were abysmal. The Core i5-13600K posted 20% faster in single-core performance and 113% in multi-core performance.

The Ryzen Z1 Extreme was superior to the Apple M1 (via Anandtech's review of the Mac Mini). The Zen 4 chip outperformed the Apple M1 by 10% in single-core performance and 38% in multi-core performance. The Ryzen Z1 Extreme was also 3% faster than the M2 Max (MacBook Pro 2023) in single-core performance. However, the M2 Max showed its strength in the multi-core benchmark, outpacing the Ryzen Z1 Extreme by 37%.

Asus has interim exclusivity to AMD's Ryzen Z1 series of high-performance processors for handheld gaming consoles. The processor's maximum potential remains a mystery. It'll be interesting to see if other manufacturers can squeeze more out of the Ryzen Z1 series.

Zhiye Liu
News Editor and Memory Reviewer

Zhiye Liu is a news editor and memory reviewer at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • watzupken
    This comparison is pointless. A Intel i5 13600K draws significantly more power than the Z1 Extreme which is destined for handheld/ mobile devices. If we cap the i5 13600K at 35W or lower, you should expect the multicore performance to tank. I don't see the point of trying to melt the Z1 Extreme by stress testing it with Cinebench, when it was not designed for such use case to begin with.
    Reply
  • Djekna80
    watzupken said:
    This comparison is pointless. A Intel i5 13600K draws significantly more power than the Z1 Extreme which is destined for handheld/ mobile devices. If we cap the i5 13600K at 35W or lower, you should expect the multicore performance to tank. I don't see the point of trying to melt the Z1 Extreme by stress testing it with Cinebench, when it was not designed for such use case to begin with.
    I agree and you can put in 11600K and I don't know why the did not and Z1 will be stalemate with him, or plus/minus few percent, why not compere with that CPU
    Reply
  • Vertigo_1
    Now let's do power consumption numbers and performance per watt.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    watzupken said:
    This comparison is pointless. A Intel i5 13600K draws significantly more power than the Z1 Extreme which is destined for handheld/ mobile devices. If we cap the i5 13600K at 35W or lower, you should expect the multicore performance to tank. I don't see the point of trying to melt the Z1 Extreme by stress testing it with Cinebench, when it was not designed for such use case to begin with.
    I don't know about the 13600 because they don't have it on the list at low power but the 13700k at 45W is still at 15.739 points in CB23, I doubt that another 10W less is going to make it drop 5000 points plus.
    https://www.computerbase.de/2022-10/intel-core-i9-13900k-i7-13700-i5-13600k-test/4/#abschnitt_leistung_in_singlecorelasten_klassisch
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    I have here the 13500t. Can test locked 35w if you guys want.
    This cpu is insanely fast... it's likely a 12600k with very low power.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    35w locked bios 1.496 mhz score multi 7350pts single 4190 mhz - 1698 pts (poor board and ddr4)
    Reply