SRAM scaling isn't dead after all — TSMC's 2nm process tech claims major improvements

TSMC
(Image credit: TSMC)
18

SRAM scaling came to a screeching halt with the last round of new process nodes, portending a dark future where on-chip memories would become increasingly expensive. However, contrary to what we've seen in the past, SRAM scaling apparently isn't dead after all. 

TSMC has announced that its N2 process technology (2nm-class) offers substantial improvements in performance, power efficiency, and area (PPA) compared to previous-generation nodes. However, there is one more thing that TSMC hasn't yet publicly discussed: considerably smaller SRAM cells and higher SRAM density (38 Mb/mm^2), which will have an impact on the costs and performance of next-generation CPUs, GPUs, and system-on-chips.  

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • Pierce2623
    If true, this is legitimately awesome news. I really thought SRAM scaling would continue to be in a really bad place which meant newer chips had much less possibility for downsizing since ~90% of a consumer CPU is SRAM.
    Reply
  • tennis2
    chips built on N2 are expected to reduce power usage by 25% to 30% (at equivalent transistor count and frequency), boost performance by 10% to 15% (with the same transistor count and power), and achieve a 15% increase in transistor density (maintaining the same speed and power).

    These should be OR statements please.
    Reply
  • usertests
    There are mistakes in the table. I'll leave it to you to figure out what they are.
    Reply
  • 80251
    Would this make any difference to AMD's 3D V-Cache? Or is that a different technology from SRAM?
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Pierce2623 said:
    ~90% of a consumer CPU is SRAM.
    Absolutely not. Where did you ever find such a figure?
    Reply
  • Steve Nord_
    Admin said:
    TSMC's N2 fabrication process shrinks SRAM bit cell size, increases SRAM density to ~38 Mb/mm^2.
    Get those soft error hardness tests at 62-68°C prepped. (Will TPUs get through post-quantum auth?)
    Reply
  • Pemalite
    Having to scroll horizontally on a table is ridiculous when the table is only using 20% of my displays horizontal real estate.
    You know you can optimize a website for mobile without sacrificing desktop usability? You can resize things for different displays.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Pemalite said:
    Having to scroll horizontally on a table is ridiculous when the table is only using 20% of my displays horizontal real estate.
    You know you can optimize a website for mobile without sacrificing desktop usability? You can resize things for different displays.
    The authors who write the articles aren't the ones that control the layout, sadly. The publisher controls this, and it's the same across virtually all of their sites.

    That said, I do think perhaps it would've worked better for the author to transpose the table. It's 6x8 (HxW), so it would've resulted in less scrolling to do that. More importantly, you're usually wanting to see how the nodes compare on a per-metric basis, which you could do without scrolling if it were transposed.
    Reply
  • Pierce2623
    bit_user said:
    Absolutely not. Where did you ever find such a figure?
    Not sure what happened there. It was supposed to be 30% and even that is a little high. Keep in mind I’m not referring only to cache but all the storage in all the various buffers and registers too.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Pierce2623 said:
    Not sure what happened there. It was supposed to be 30% and even that is a little high. Keep in mind I’m not referring only to cache but all the storage in all the various buffers and registers too.
    Huh. Yeah, 30% sounds more reasonable.
    Reply