Seagate: 100TB HDDs Due in 2030, Multi-Actuator Drives to Become Common

Seagate is on track to deliver ~50TB hard disk drives by 2026, ~100TB HDDs by 2030, and 120TB+ units early next decade, according to the company's recently revealed product and technology roadmaps. To hit capacity targets, Seagate will have to adopt new magnetic recording technologies. To ensure the high performance of its future drives, the company plans to leverage its multi-actuator technology more broadly. This tech doubles the performance of its hard drives, and it could become a standard feature on some of the company's product lines. 

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • MarsISwaiting
    This is not good for the future of storage devices . HDD should die out by 2030 and SSD should replace them entirely .

    Imagine trying to backup a failing 100TB harddisk. Such high capacity demands speed.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    MarsISwaiting said:
    This is not good for the future of storage devices . HDD should die out by 2030 and SSD should replace them entirely .

    Imagine trying to backup a failing 100TB harddisk. Such high capacity demands speed.
    This is a business use case, not for the typical home user.
    You build your backup plan around what you're going to use. A failing drive would just fail over to its mirror, which is not failing. Replace the dead drive whenever.
    HDD still has a place alongside solid state. Ny NAS has 12 drives in or attached to it. 11 of the 12 are HDD. ~51TB space..
    Not so very long ago, people were saying the exact same things about 1TB drives. "OMG! That's too much."

    If I were to replace my NAS HDDs with SSD:
    SATA III = $5000
    NVMe = $8200

    I'd rather buy another car.
    Reply
  • truerock
    Yes, absolutely... making full-backups of HDDs had and has become problematic.
    I was a data-storage product manager at a multi-national corporation.
    Before I retired, we had given up on performing full-backups of HDDs on the weekends.
    We had to use mirroring to off-site storage as the new data-recovery process.
    Also, because of legal requirements, some of the mirrored HDDs had to be moved to Iron Mountain for long term storage.
    When I retired the corporation was trying to get rid of the Iron Mountain requirements because it was becoming too difficult to create copies of the mirrored drives.
    For my home PC, I have a 12TB HDD that stores multi-media files such as video, audio and pictures.
    I use eSATAIII for backups to local external HDD storage and I have given up on full-backups.
    I perform incremental backups only.
    My PC was built in 2012. When I get around to building a new PC (probably early 2022) I will definitely need to have some type of mirroring set up for HDD backups with some type of automatic file-versioning built in.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    I use Macrium Reflect, and Full/Incremental/Differential, as the particular system dictates.

    Somewhat modified since this was written, but it works for me:
    https://forums.tomshardware.com/threads/what-is-your-backup-situation-at-home.2997205/
    Reply
  • truerock
    Multi-Actuator drives is just 2 HDDs (or more) as far as I'm concerned. I'm assuming putting 2 HDDs in 1 HDD enclosure saves space and power. Performance would be about the same?
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    100tb hdd......couldnt even imagine how long it would take to notice/read/copy/verify in case a raid drive failed....
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    hotaru251 said:
    100tb hdd......couldnt even imagine how long it would take to notice/read/copy/verify in case a raid drive failed....
    If one of a pair fails, the RAID software should notify you immediately.
    No matter what the size.
    Reply
  • tfourk
    The head failure will consist of a double tap now.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    USAFRet said:
    If one of a pair fails, the RAID software should notify you immediately.
    No matter what the size.
    Notifications are instananeous, but his other points are valid. I run an Unraid server at home and the parity drive is 16TB. All drives are 7200rpm Seagate Exos drives. Solid performance drives by mechanical standards and it still takes over a day to complete the monthy array verification or rebuild the array if I replace a drive. 100TB drive would take almost a week without a significant speed up which no one is predicting.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    spongiemaster said:
    Notifications are instananeous, but his other points are valid. I run an Unraid server at home and the parity drive is 16TB. All drives are 7200rpm Seagate Exos drives. Solid performance drives by mechanical standards and it still takes over a day to complete thr monthy array verification or rebuild the array if I replace a drive. 100TB drive would take almost a week without a significant speed up which no one is predicting.
    Right.
    That's why you have it fail over to an identical array.
    Replace the 1 failed drive in Array 1 as needed. The system is still running 100% from Array 2.

    100TB drives will happen.
    Just like 1TB, 10TB drives were considered "large" at the time.
    Reply