What HP Needs for Slate to Take on iPad, and Win

Earlier today Engadget unearthed an internal presentation from HP that shows what advantages HP's Slate have over Apple's iPad, and vice versa. The presentation is there to help HP employees understand what needs to be done and what they can write home about.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
  • ravicai
    Apple has cornered the market on easy to use products for the layman. For mainstream users; storefronts are where it's at. For powerusers; find it cheaper or free and install it yourself.
    Reply
  • jmchien
    how do you get 1080p playback on 1024x600?...

    it's interesting to note that the Slate is rated for ~5hrs at 30Whr and ~10hrs at 25Whr for the iPad... wonder if it's b/c win7 is a full OS...

    good article in general

    Reply
  • dimar
    I only care about the tablet's physical usability. I want at least 3Gig of DDR3 RAM, like miniSODIMM... and running windows 7. There's enough apps already.
    Reply
  • Sunburn74
    Go HP! We are all rooting for you guys!
    Reply
  • Kelavarus
    It's... Windows. Why are you worrying about apps/music/movies/etc... stores? Again, it's Windows. Use iTunes if you wish, use Zune, use whatever. That's kind of the point of it being... Windows.

    Definitely, navigation and interface are important, and if they could bump down the price a smidgen, that'd be jolly good, but I don't see why those other portions are worries.

    Would be nice if they did 1024x768 as a resolution. I have a netbook and 1024x600 is irritating.
    Reply
  • tuannguyen
    KelavarusIt's... Windows. Why are you worrying about apps/music/movies/etc... stores? Again, it's Windows. Use iTunes if you wish, use Zune, use whatever. That's kind of the point of it being... Windows. Definitely, navigation and interface are important, and if they could bump down the price a smidgen, that'd be jolly good, but I don't see why those other portions are worries.Would be nice if they did 1024x768 as a resolution. I have a netbook and 1024x600 is irritating.Like I pointed out in my article, HP needs to address the mainstream users first, not those like you and others who know exactly what to look for. HP needs to go after the market that aren't technical and need hand holding. Only by integrated stores into the tablet itself, can this be attractive to that larger dimonination of people.

    HP cannot expect to win by repeating the same things others have tried countless times before. It needs to do something different, something way more massive than what's been done. Look back at all the tablet makers that have thought the same "it's Windows, it's already all there," and see how successful they were.

    They weren't.

    Cheers.
    / Tuan
    Reply
  • dimar
    I'm not sure if win7 and 1Gig of RAM will play nice.
    RAM is cheap, why can't they get just this one right?
    Reply
  • macbook
    dimarI only care about the tablet's physical usability. I want at least 3Gig of DDR3 RAM, like miniSODIMM... and running windows 7. There's enough apps already.The article did not say HP needs to make a whole bunch of new apps. What I said was that HP needs to support developers to retool existing good apps for use on the TouchSmart system. Why would they need to remake brand new apps when the Slate already runs Windows 7?

    Desktop apps lazily slapped on a tablet because the develop didn't give two dimes about the user experience but want to gouge for money, don't belong there. Apps that have the same or similar functionality as their desktop counterparts with intuitive touch interfaces designed for a touch device, such as the Slate, is key..
    Reply
  • dimar
    Apps that have the same or similar functionality as their desktop counterparts with intuitive touch interfaces designed for a touch device, such as the Slate, is key.
    agreed :-)
    Reply
  • mj4358
    Good luck!
    The main problem with HP's Slate is MS's failure to develop a lean functional OS for a Tablet . HP, just like all the other PC companies always cram a bunch of usless hardware features and slap windows on it and call it good. Rarely do they take the time to develop a product from the ground up because to do that would require major investment and R&D that they may not recoup fully because they always compete on price point with Dell, Lenovop, Acer. That always starts the race to the bottom of the Barrel and then you end up with Acer beating them all with crappy hardware and half baked Software in a decent package at a price Walmart loving Americans eat up.
    If HP and Dell would stop being followers and make products that are not an after thought, Apple would not have a leg to stand on. They need to pressure Software makers to make quality programs and drives, MS to make Quality OS's and also make an honest effort to make a quality product built to standard and not price. Apple has proven time again that people will pay more for quality and workmanship over a gaget laden products that barely works. Until they figure how to get the Windows ecosystem to work in unison, they will alway be followers of a company who is 15% of the market share with 3x the Market Value of their competetor with zero debt and nearly 40 billion in the bank!
    Reply