The only Chinese chipmaker with an x86 license releases surprisingly modern new chips made with a mystery process node — Zhaoxin KX-7000 CPU launches with eight cores, 3.7GHz clocks, PCIe 4.0, DDR5 memory support, and chiplet-based design
Twice as fast as the KX-6000.
It's been a long journey for Zhaoxin and its KX-7000 series consumer CPUs, which were first anticipated to launch in 2019. They have arrived at last, with Zhaoxin claiming that the KX-7000 is twice as fast as the previous generation KX-6000 processors we tested. The KX-7000 represents an important step forward for China's fledgling semiconductor industry as it looks to gain independence from Western technology and sanctions, and it comes from the sole Chinese company with an x86 manufacturing license. Speaking of which, the US has restricted China's access to leading process node technologies, making it hard for the country to create chips. Zhoaxin isn't divulging the process node used in its new processor, and sources close to the matter tell Tom's Hardware that the company won't reveal its fab partner or process node due to an NDA. The new chip does use a chiplet-based architecture, so it is possible the company is relying upon multiple fabs for production.
In either case, the Zhoaxin KX-7000 chips are sure to be one of the fastest CPUs natively made in China, and they come with a much more robust array of platform features that provide modern amenities — a rarity with China's self-designed chips. These new features include PCIe 4.0 interfaces and DDR5 memory support.
The new "Century Avenue" architecture inside KX-7000 has an improved front-end, out-of-order execution, and optimizations to the cache and memory system, so it's plausible that Zhaoxin might have pulled off a Zen moment. Fellow Chinese CPU maker Loongson achieved Zen 3-like IPC with its 3A6000, so there's no reason Zhaoxin couldn't do the same. Additionally, the chips are said to be based on a chiplet-style architecture, presumably with different chiplets for I/O and compute, though this has yet to be confirmed.
Chinese CPU designer Zhaoxin was founded in 2013 when VIA Technologies joined forces with the Shangai Municipal Government. Although VIA hadn't been particularly relevant in the CPU space for several years, it crucially is one of the three companies with a license to the x86 architecture, alongside Intel and AMD. This gives its CPUs a big leg up since they can natively access the massive library of PC-related software made for x86 processors.
Row 0 - Cell 0 | KX-7000* | KX-U6880A | Ryzen 7 7700X | Core i5-14600K |
Cores | 8 | 8 | 8 | 14 (6P+8E) |
Threads | 8 | 8 | 16 | 20 |
Base Frequency | 3.2GHz | 3GHz | 4.5GHz | 3.5GHz |
Boost Frequency | 3.7GHz | N/A | 5.4GHz | 5.3GHz |
Cache | 4MB L2 + 32MB | 8MB L2 | 8MB L2 + 32MB L3 | 20MB L2 + 24MB L3 |
Memory Support | DDR5-4800/DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-5600/DDR4-3200 |
Maximum Memory | 128GB | 64GB | 128GB | 192GB |
PCIe Support | 4.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 5.0/4.0 |
PCIe Lanes | 24 | 16 | 24 | 20 |
Process | TSMC 7nm** | TSMC 16nm | TSMC 5nm | Intel 7 |
*Specific model name not yet known
**Unconfirmed
Zhaoxin hasn't named any specific members of the KX-7000 series, but the spec sheet indicates there will be at least two models differentiated by clock speed. We've put the model with the higher clock speed in the table. The top-end KX-7000 chip, compared to the last generation KXU-6880A, has a 23% higher frequency and over four times the cache, which would partly explain why KX-7000 CPUs are expected to be twice as fast as KX-6000 models.
Zhaoxin hasn't increased core or thread counts with KX-7000, and the highest configuration remains an eight-core and eight-thread CPU. Assuming Zhaoxin is accurate with its performance claims, the rest of the increased performance presumably stems from architectural improvements, implying a monstrous boost in IPC (instructions per clock).
KX-7000 is more than just a performance boost, though, as it also comes with several platform improvements. Compared to the KX-6000, the KX-7000 has double the supported memory capacity, DDR5 RAM, PCIe 4.0 compatibility, eight more PCIe lanes, and support for USB4. The processors will come in both LGA and BGA form factors.
Of course, KX-7000 will naturally be compared against its x86 rivals, and the comparison isn't super favorable. The midrange Ryzen 7 7700X and Core i5-13600K both have massively higher clock speeds than the top-end KX-7000 model, plus more threads — and cores in the case of the 13600K, though most are smaller E-cores. They also support faster RAM speeds, which can factor into a variety of workloads.
On the other hand, the KX-7000 is remarkably equal when it comes to platform features. KX-7000 CPUs and motherboards support as much RAM as AMD's Ryzen 7000-series, and even as many PCIe lanes. Intel has Zhaoxin beat on memory capacity, but KX-7000 actually bests Intel's Raptor Lake architecture in PCIe lane count. Indeed, KX-7000 doesn't have PCIe 5.0 support, but that's not a massive problem for consumer PCs given that the technology is only used for top-end SSDs at the moment, which aren't likely to appeal to the kind of consumer interested in the KX-7000.
Whether KX-7000 beats or even levels the playing field isn't the whole point for China. The ultimate goal is achieving technological autonomy, even if using Chinese CPUs means losing out on raw performance and features. The chip's support for SM encryption instructions, made in China to avoid prying Western eyes, is emblematic of the country's efforts to attain autonomy.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Matthew Connatser is a freelancing writer for Tom's Hardware US. He writes articles about CPUs, GPUs, SSDs, and computers in general.
-
ivan_vy "Whether KX-7000 beats or even levels the playing field isn't the whole point for China. The ultimate goal is achieving technological autonomy"Reply
exactly, and in the meantime US companies will lose a big market.
this is why Nvidia is selling them as much as they can, CPU is bound to be replaced, GPGPU+IA accelerators will take a longer time.
edit:typo -
artk2219 Now I want one for testing, im sure its going to be ridiculously expensive for what it is when it becomes available to buy from Aliexpress, but it would be fun to benchmark and compare. It would be nice if they built a whole socketed platform around it, but that may be putting the cart before the horse for now.Reply -
Albert.Thomas Hey Matt,Reply
I feel like you should have added more information about VIA/Centaur's CNS project. It's almost certain these are evolved versions of the Centaur CNS CPUs which were never publicly released. -
Nicholas Steel > Speaking of which, the US has restricted China's access to leading process node technologies, making it hard for the country to create chips.Reply
No, it makes it hard to compete with the latest chips from the west... it does not make it hard to make computer chips. All it means is their software devs will have to git gud at optimizing. -
ivan_vy
probably can run on existing MoBo (be Intel or AMD), otherwise they would throw away whole ecosystems and make them harder and more expensive to replace in the short term.artk2219 said:Now I want one for testing, im sure its going to be ridiculously expensive for what it is when it becomes available to buy from Aliexpress, but it would be fun to benchmark and compare. It would be nice if they built a whole socketed platform around it, but that may be putting the cart before the horse for now. -
bit_user Fellow Chinese CPU maker Loongson achieved Zen 3-like IPC with its 3A6000, so there's no reason Zhaoxin couldn't do the same.
Well... Loongson did kinda make its own ISA (debatable ties to MIPS - let's not get sidetracked on that, please). Making a fast x86 CPU is going to be more difficult, due to the complexity of the ISA.
Although VIA hadn't been particularly relevant in the CPU space for several years, it crucially is one of the three companies with a license to the x86 architecture, alongside Intel and AMD.
I haven't seen anyone debate whether Via can legitimately make x86, but didn't they get that by buying Centaur? And didn't they recently sell off the remnants of Centaur to Intel?
This gives its CPUs a big leg up since they can natively access the massive library of PC-related software made for x86 processors.
Even so, it's unlikely to run as fast as Apple's processors can execute x86 code under emulation.
Boost Frequency 3.7GHz
You know the first x86 CPU to reach 3.7 GHz was a Pentium 4, right? So, clock speed definitely doesn't tell the whole story!
So, referring back to the previous generation this is supposedly 2x as fast as...
Source: https://www.tomshardware.com/features/zhaoxin-kx-u6780a-x86-cpu-tested/4
Uh... 2x of that would be usable? I think that's the best I can say. -
bit_user
Eh, that's not what they say.Albert.Thomas said:I feel like you should have added more information about VIA/Centaur's CNS project. It's almost certain these are evolved versions of the Centaur CNS CPUs which were never publicly released.
Here are some details about a prior, 28 nm SoC they developed 6 years ago.
"WuDaoKou is largely a brand new architecture designed by Zhaoxin. This is a departure from earlier microarchitectures such as ZhangJiang which were a lightly modified version of VIA Technologies (Centaur) architecture. WuDaoKou is a new and complete SoC design."
https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/zhaoxin/microarchitectures/wudaokou
That's the claim, anyway. Yes, they had access to Centaur's IP. ...so, legitimate questions remain. -
bit_user
The previous generation that Toms actually reviewed was BGA (soldered):ivan_vy said:probably can run on existing MoBo (be Intel or AMD), otherwise they would throw away whole ecosystems and make them harder and more expensive to replace in the short term.
https://www.tomshardware.com/features/zhaoxin-kx-u6780a-x86-cpu-tested
You do know the Chinese are pretty good at making motherboards, right? That's not the hard part!
Yes, running Windows on the thing would require new drivers, if you don't reuse an existing chipset, but I somehow doubt either AMD or Intel is going to give them support for reusing an existing chipset. Plus, Via was once famous for making its own x86 motherboard chipsets! -
atomicWAR While I have been surprised at the level of advancement China has made for CPUs+ in recent history, I expect we are getting cherry picked data here and the real performance will be far less than what is advertised. Regardless their advancements are nothing to be sneezed at and I hope it will push other companies to do better. Certainly the US based CPU/GPU companies need to step things up or risk losing the edge they currently have. These embargos have really lit a fire under China's back side to become independent of US and other 'foreign' powers chip making technologies.Reply
Ultimately this is disheartening yet exciting news (from a tech stand point) all at the same time. I'll be curious to follow their progress. -
D1v1n3D Uhhh the 7700x supports 192Gb of ram as well via 48gb ram chips why make the Intel chips look better than they really are there has been no real arch change since 12th gen Intel. Plenty of reviews showing a 2 to 6% performance increases from 12th to 14th gen Intel sad days can't wait for AMD 8***/9*** series in Feb March April to really put a lot of pressure on IntelReply