Intel details 14A performance and new 'Turbo Cells' that unlock maximum CPU and GPU frequency

Turbo Cells
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Intel made a slew of announcements at its Intel Foundry Direct 2025 event in San Jose, California, and finally shared performance metrics for its upcoming 14A process node, slated for risk production in 2027, touting headline improvements of up to a 35% reduction in power consumption. Intel also teased its new Turbo Cell technology, a customizable design approach geared to provide maximum CPU frequency and to boost performance for critical speed paths in GPUs.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • Findecanor
    Remember that "14A" is a trademark, not a measurement.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    Findecanor said:
    Remember that "14A" is a trademark, not a measurement.
    It is a marketing thing sure, but it is there to show that some progress was made, they also showed actual numbers. Or at least numbers, we will see when they come out if they are actual.
    30% density 15-20% per/W ,looks pretty good.
    https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/JmiSB9VLmyq4HKsTz9memT-1200-80.png.webp
    Reply
  • rluker5
    Turbo cells seems like something they already should have had. Along with Power Direct to minimize EM interference.

    Getting stronger on the basics.
    Reply
  • Rob1C
    So, they plan on leaving the 6.2 GHz i9-14900KS in the dust?
    Reply
  • tennis2
    Chip design is amazing. How did humanity even get to this point at all?
    Reply
  • TheSecondPower
    rluker5 said:
    Turbo cells seems like something they already should have had. Along with Power Direct to minimize EM interference.

    Getting stronger on the basics.
    Power Direct is the second iteration of Intel's backside power delivery, and by this schedule will come to market about the same time as TSMC's first iteration of backside power delivery.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    rluker5 said:
    Turbo cells seems like something they already should have had.
    They already do things like this, with cells designed for different power/density tradeoffs. For a long time, IIUC.

    Another technique they've at least used in the past is to place multiple transistors in parallel, when necessary.
    https://www.anandtech.com/show/4818/counting-transistors-why-116b-and-995m-are-both-correct
    Reply
  • bit_user
    tennis2 said:
    Chip design is amazing. How did humanity even get to this point at all?
    Engineering involves a lot of iteration and progressive refinement. You figure out what are the limiting factors, focus on addressing those, and then re-analyze and probably find new limitations that need new solutions. All along the way, the process is fed by thousands of brilliant minds and many $B of investment. That's why some country can't just replicate all of that progress overnight, no matter what resources they throw at it.

    There's also something of a virtuous circle, where the machines produced by current technology enable us to design better machines tomorrow. Even with all the knowledge about how current chip manufacturing works, you couldn't just start turning out the same chips decades ago. Not only is there innovation along the entire supply chain, but also the sheer compute power needed to create photomasks for modern chips simply didn't exist very long ago. Not to mention place & route.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Rob1C said:
    So, they plan on leaving the 6.2 GHz i9-14900KS in the dust?
    FWIW, the numbers quoted for performance & efficiency increases are usually based on a simple reference design. I think TSMC used an Arm Cortex-A7 core, for a long time. It's hard to predict exactly how they will translate into metrics of actual products made on these nodes.

    In the case of Arrow Lake, it seems like a big part of what held it back was the SoC architecture. So, even though the process node and microarchitecture were both substantially improved, those got kneecapped by a SoC design that prioritized other things above performance.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    tennis2 said:
    Chip design is amazing. How did humanity even get to this point at all?

    Time and investment. It's been almost 80 years since the transistor was invented and it's probably one of the most heavily invested in areas over that time. Time and money can drive a lot of refinement in a product. Even cars and airplanes are orders of magnitude more complex than they were 80 years ago thanks to heavy amounts of investment over that time.
    Reply