Intel reportedly scaling back R&D teams in Israel — several hundred talented staff will be laid off
But already this year dozens have left for Nvidia.
Intel plans to reduce its workforce by several hundred employees at its Israeli research and development centers, following similar job cuts at its facilities elsewhere, reports DigiTimes. This move is part of the company's general cost-cutting measures amid financial challenges, and it opens opportunities for competitors to attract Intel's talent. There is a catch, though, as dozens of Intel employees already left the company for Nvidia earlier this year, according to Globes.
Intel's Israeli operations employ around 11,700 people, including 7,800 in R&D roles and 3,900 in manufacturing, with the latest layoffs expected to focus on R&D while leaving manufacturing staff largely intact as Intel readies for the completion of Fab 38 in Kiryat Gat, the report says. The exact number of people that will either be proposed to leave voluntarily, or retire, or just laid off is not known, but Globes reports that Intel is set to cut its Israeli workforce by several hundred positions.
Intel has three R&D sites in Israel. Each of these Israeli centers has a specialized focus: Haifa works on CPUs, AI hardware, and software; Petah Tikva develops communications and AI solutions; and Jerusalem is involved in communications, software, and cybersecurity. The report does not specify which R&D sites will see more cuts, other than saying that layoffs are expected in these R&D centers. But let us try to detail at least one thing.
Intel's Israeli R&D team is responsible for multiple breakthrough microarchitectures, such as Banias, Yonah/Merom, and Nehalem, just to name a few. Each of these was strategically important for Intel at some point. In fact, the Banias processor was the heart of Intel's Centrino platform, the company's first platform developed specifically for laptops, which pretty much revolutionized the market. Yonah/Merom put Intel back on the map of high-performance PCs and replaced the power-hungry Netburst microarchitecture that powered Pentium 4 processors.
But while Intel itself is slashing its R&D talent in Israel, it should be noted that people are leaving the company, too. Nvidia has been hiring former Intel employees: in 2024 alone, at least 30 Intel employees moved to Nvidia's offices in Yokneam and Tel Aviv, with total hires from Intel estimated to range from 60 to 90, according to the Globes report which analyzed LinkedIn profiles. Nvidia is expected to hire more Intel employees as the layoffs continue, possibly bringing the number to about 100. As of June 30, Nvidia reported a workforce of 4,000 employees in Israel, reflecting the company’s growing presence in the region.
Many Intel employees who moved to Nvidia are benefiting from more attractive compensation packages. For instance, a junior hardware engineer at Nvidia can expect a starting annual salary of NIS 566,000 (around $151,500), about 33% higher than the equivalent role at Intel. Nvidia also offers significantly more valuable share options compared to Intel, with packages starting at NIS 56,200 annually ($15,045).
In addition to Nvidia, other major tech companies are also drawing former Intel employees. Apple, Amazon, and Intel's subsidiary Mobileye have recently hired from Intel's workforce in Israel. Some groups have joined Microsoft, Google, and Huawei, which operates a development center in Haifa.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
kpluck If they were "talented staff" wouldn't Intel be in a better position then they are now?Reply
-kp -
hotaru251
you can be gods gift to the technical world and still be in a bad position due to upper managements choices.kpluck said:If they were "talented staff" wouldn't Intel be in a better position then they are now?
-kp
The people at the top are 100% issue with intel not the people who actually make/develop the stuff. -
ThisIsMe OMG STAAAaaaawwwpp!!Reply
Seriously!! Everyday you guys post a handful of negative “articles” about how bad, stupid, or evil Intel is. It’s like you guys have a daily quota or maybe just bad ex stalker kind of vibes. These things read like you used AI to scan for, paraphrase, and then automatically post every piece of negative Intel “news” on the internet. Most of these are just things we already read about weeks or months ago. They aren’t news. Seriously stop please!
Oh and for the record, even if they did lay off hundreds in that region, according to the total numbers you presented in the article it would still be around 1% or less of the workforce there. And that’s only taking into account the R&D personnel. This seems to fall within what most would consider normal routine turnovers.
And about the dozens of employees supposedly escaping Intel’s evil clutches for NVidia warming embrace, I’m surprised it’s not way more than that even if you only look at the normal, consistent, or routine employment shifts for the industry. Using the word dozens instead of tens would make it sound a bit more dramatic I suppose, even if they amount to about the same guesstimates.
This whole thing really does seem amateur. It’s like you guys are now the TMZ of the tech world. You’re only a few paparazzi camera shots of Pat heading into work without wearing a bra away from making it there. It’s a slippery slope.
Anyway, if anyone needs me I’ll be over there screaming at the wall in frustration. -
systemBuilder_49 Intel has three times the staff of AMD but I don't see them in three times the markets and I don't see them making products that are three times better! The company is so bloated and poorly managed that it just got kicked out of the s&p 500! They are now whining about Biden not subsidizing them "enough" with the chips act! Well people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, Intel!Reply
They are STILL an anti competitive lawbreaker like paying board makers to use ONLY weird colors on AMD motherboards! Good riddance, Intel, you won't be missed ... -
bit_user
Intel has fabs; AMD doesn't. It's quite simple. To compare Intel with AMD, you should add together AMD's employees with a good chunk of TSMC's.systemBuilder_49 said:Intel has three times the staff of AMD but I don't see them in three times the markets and I don't see them making products that are three times better! The company is so bloated and poorly managed
I'm not defending Intel, outright. I've said many critical things of them, both over the years and recently. I'm just pointing out that your analysis is deeply flawed. -
bit_user
Not sure about the accuracy, but you can find other microarchitectures supposedly developed at Haifa, via Wikichip:The article said:Intel's Israeli R&D team is responsible for multiple breakthrough microarchitectures, such as Banias, Yonah/Merom, and Nehalem, just to name a few.
https://en.wikichip.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=haifa
If anyone can expound or elaborate on that, feel free to chime in. -
Hotrod2go
Yes indeed, but the main problem I see here is poor management, not so much the talent.bit_user said:Intel has fabs; AMD doesn't. It's quite simple. To compare Intel with AMD, you should add together AMD's employees with a good chunk of TSMC's.
I'm not defending Intel, outright. I've said many critical things of them, both over the years and recently. I'm just pointing out that your analysis is deeply flawed. -
bit_user
I'm not one to defend their management or corporate practices (e.g. dividends & share buybacks), but they're currently caught between a rock and a hard place.Hotrod2go said:Yes indeed, but the main problem I see here is poor management, not so much the talent.
On one side, they face rising fab costs that are requiring ever greater investment. On the other, they face a disintegrating market for x86. Compounding that, they've suffered from execution failures that have hurt their ability to hold onto what remains of the x86 market or capitalizing on it effectively (i.e. with the dependence on TSMC killing their margins on Meteor, Lunar, and Arrow Lake; increased warranty costs undermining the profitability of Raptor Lake).
I think Gelsinger had the right overall ideas, but he just came onboard and started trying to turn the ship much too late and it's running aground. If Intel had executed perfectly (e.g. not had the epic Sapphire Rapids delays, not had the Raptor Lake debacle, achieved better yields on Intel 4, and not had to cancel Intel 20A), maybe they could've avoided some of this pain they're now suffering. He also faced the historic PC downturn of '22-'23. However, any plan that depends on perfect execution could itself be said to be somewhat flawed. Anyway, to the extent I blame management, I think it's mostly those prior to his tenure. -
Hotrod2go
Yes, I can see all that. But I honestly thought as far back as the later years of the first decade in this century, the x86 PC market was going to fad away because of the advent of mobile computing & all that entails. As soon as the first iphone hit the market, it was a big hit with the consumers. But here we are in late 2024 & just look at all the PC component makers that are on the market today. It's really quite amazing how an old architecture just keeps on giving, at least economically to all those startups that are now entrenched in this market - everything from the DIY enthusiasts to commercial scale servers since the 2000's to this day.bit_user said:I'm not one to defend their management or corporate practices (e.g. dividends & share buybacks), but they're currently caught between a rock and a hard place.
On one side, they face rising fab costs that are requiring ever greater investment. On the other, they face a disintegrating market for x86. Compounding that, they've suffered from execution failures that have hurt their ability to hold onto what remains of the x86 market or capitalizing on it effectively (i.e. with the dependence on TSMC killing their margins on Meteor, Lunar, and Arrow Lake; increased warranty costs undermining the profitability of Raptor Lake).
I think Gelsinger had the right overall ideas, but he just came onboard and started trying to turn the ship much too late and it's running aground. If Intel had executed perfectly (e.g. not had the epic Sapphire Rapids delays, not had the Raptor Lake debacle, achieved better yields on Intel 4, and not had to cancel Intel 20A), maybe they could've avoided some of this pain they're now suffering. He also faced the historic PC downturn of '22-'23. However, any plan that depends on perfect execution could itself be said to be somewhat flawed. Anyway, to the extent I blame management, I think it's mostly those prior to his tenure.
I don't understand this "historic PC downturn in 22' - 23'? wasn't that during the pandemic when wfh was a thing & upgrading the old home PC became very trendy?
Intel's hybrid alderlake architecture was an experiment, & now look at what they've done with arrowlake, it's still there but they chopped HT from it. Too much complexity bit them back!
Anyway, what's going to happen when quantum computing really comes into its own for home usage? that's a whole other topic altogether. There is so much complexity with what will happen in the future, its only just guess work from us atm.