Intel sells stake in Arm, estimated to raise $147 million as part of business turnaround

The Arm logo
(Image credit: Arm Holdings)

Intel has sold its entire stake in Arm Holdings during the second quarter, the company's filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission revealed on Tuesday. The company also sold its stake in ZeroFox, a cybersecurity company, and reduced stake in Astera Labs, a developer of connectivity platforms for enterprise.

Intel generated some $147 million selling its stake in Arm Holdings, a relatively small sum for a company that posted a $1.6 billion loss for its second quarter. This move is part of Intel's ongoing effort to cut costs, which includes significant job cuts and expense reductions. 

Intel's recent regulatory filing revealed that it no longer holds the 1.18 million shares of Arm it owned three months ago, as noticed by Bloomberg. The average price of Arm's stock during this period was $124.34 per share, leading to the estimated $147 million pay-out. The company also reduced stake in Astera Labs (which has always been seen as a strategic investment for Intel to ensure steady supply of things like PCIe retimers) and got rid of its stake in ZeroFox. Despite this, Intel reported a net loss of $120 million on its equity investments for the quarter. 

Earlier this month, the company posted a dismal earnings report, which led to a nearly 33% drop in its stock value. Intel's struggles are compounded by the loss of unit and revenue market share to competitors, such as AMD, which uses the x86 instruction set architecture, and Apple, which uses the Arm ISA. 

In response, Intel has announced plans to eliminate 15,000 jobs and cut other expenses to stabilize its financial position. Additionally, the company has suspended its dividend as part of these austerity measures. 

Arm Holdings, majority-owned by Japan's SoftBank Group, is a key player in the semiconductor sector, which designs are found in the majority of smartphones and tablets. For Intel, an investment in Arm may be considered as a strategic one as the company is working with Arm on datacenter platforms optimized for its Intel 18A process technology. But Arm may be also interested in Intel as a potential licensee of its technologies as well as a partner of its other licensees. 

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • Marlin1975
    Intel seems to be hard up for money right now.
    I know they have some issues but every day its something new. Maybe things are worse than most think.
    Reply
  • MisterZ
    How can they be losing so much money? I thought they're the market leader by a large margin?
    Reply
  • tamalero
    MisterZ said:
    How can they be losing so much money? I thought they're the market leader by a large margin?
    Generally its overbloated management. But sure they will love to fire small workers who make everything run XD
    Reply
  • Blastomonas
    Small change. Why bother.. Pat probably earns more than this in bonuses.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    Hey @bit_user, remember when I said the bean counters would start making dumb decisions?

    Regards.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    -Fran- said:
    Hey @bit_user, remember when I said the bean counters would start making dumb decisions?
    What do you think might be the practical consequences of this decision?
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    bit_user said:
    What do you think might be the practical consequences of this decision?
    Immediate ones? None, I'd say.

    ARM has been on the decline, kind of, and they haven't been showing much in the spirit of improvement, I'd say. Didn't help Qualcomm botching the "Windows on ARM" launch to the degree they have, bringing with it a lot of the momentum ARM could have had in the space.

    All the others, I'm not totally sure, but read like they could have been good long term investments. Still, short-term cash seems to have been the priority here.

    As with all things, time will tell, but I'll stick to my "dumb decision" story.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • thesyndrome
    -Fran- said:
    Immediate ones? None, I'd say.

    ARM has been on the decline, kind of, and they haven't been showing much in the spirit of improvement, I'd say. Didn't help Qualcomm botching the "Windows on ARM" launch to the degree they have, bringing with it a lot of the momentum ARM could have had in the space.

    All the others, I'm not totally sure, but read like they could have been good long term investments. Still, short-term cash seems to have been the priority here.

    As with all things, time will tell, but I'll stick to my "dumb decision" story.

    Regards.
    Was it a major botched release? The worst I heard was that the iGPU isn't detected by some games and programs, and that the x86 emulator made it run slower than native x86 for programs that haven't incorporated native ARM support.

    I'm not saying you're wrong at all, I'm just curious what other problems it had, because I hadn't heard anything so bad that the release could be considered botched
    Reply
  • renz496
    MisterZ said:
    How can they be losing so much money? I thought they're the market leader by a large margin?
    Those fab are very expensive to maintain. One of the reason why AMD have to let go GF before.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    thesyndrome said:
    Was it a major botched release? The worst I heard was that the iGPU isn't detected by some games and programs, and that the x86 emulator made it run slower than native x86 for programs that haven't incorporated native ARM support.

    I'm not saying you're wrong at all, I'm just curious what other problems it had, because I hadn't heard anything so bad that the release could be considered botched
    Wendell explained it better than me, for sure:

    qKRmYW1D0S0View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKRmYW1D0S0

    Regards.
    Reply