Intel loses $1.6 billion as data center CPU and foundry divisions struggle

Intel
(Image credit: Intel)

On Thursday, Intel announced its financial results for the second quarter of 2024, and they weren't favorable to the chip giant: The company's revenue dropped by 1% year-over-year while its losses totaled $1.6 billion. Perhaps worse is that Intel expects the second half of the year to be challenging for its business. As a result, Intel announced plans to cut its workforce by a rather whopping 15% this year

Intel's cuts will be severe. The company plans to slash CapEx by 20% and reduce R&D tremendously as it restructures and stops work on 'underperforming' products. It will embark on one of the largest layoffs in its 56-year history. 

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • AlskiOnTheWeb
    TCO of data center hardware is heavily weighted now by power cost inflation. Intel's power hungry thermally inefficient chips that they have cranked out for so long ... have finally come home to roost.
    Reply
  • DS426
    Crazy to think that Intel is so late to the AI party that their DCAI segment isn't even a high point. Conversely but not surprisingly, the AI uber marketing hype has allowed them to excel in CCG. That bubble won't last and obviously the 13th-14th gen voltage debacle already has an impact on their financials and will far more greatly so for the next couple of quarters, especially as the big customers switch to AMD.

    Pat bragged about regaining advance node leadership in this quarter's financials comments but then is proceeding to lay off 15% of their workforce. Once again, the determination to continue driving hard to realize long-term goals and vision is bashed by short-term goals and shareholder profit-focus. So yeah, this node leadership looks to be short-lived.

    I can only hope that Battlemage will be competitive, making a little something for Intel and thus they'll continue their dGPU development as the competition is needed and definitely benefits consumers.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    Datacenter is definitely the replacement cycle and a combination of AMD's efficiency and good execution. If GNR had landed last year I'm not sure the dip would have been as bad. Now we're getting to that point where old hardware needs to be replaced and unless the accelerators Intel is providing are important AMD seems to be the only logical choice. SRF is a compelling product and CWF seems to be on a somewhat accelerated timeline (for enterprise) which leads me to believe they see a solid market there.

    Realistically the way I view a lot of these issues still comes back to the way wall street works moreso than anything else. Everything that needs to be done to right the ship after years of maximizing profits over engineering is capital intensive. If there's one thing modern investing despises it is capital expenditure because the returns are never quick even if they happen to be virtually guaranteed.
    Reply
  • JRStern
    Intel has been hiding Sapphire Rapids problems (including from stockholders and the SEC), and hasn't had a fully successful new server chip in what, TEN YEARS?
    Reply