Intel's next CEO could be Lip-Bu Tan, a former member of the board who reportedly clashed with Gelsinger about strategy

Intel's headquarters in Santa Clara, Calif.
(Image credit: Intel)

Intel is actively seeking a new CEO following the resignation of Pat Gelsinger, who resigned on Monday. The board is considering several candidates, including former board member Lip-Bu Tan, who stepped down from the Intel board of directions several months ago after disagreements with Pat Gelsinger over how Intel should proceed forward, reports Reuters

Gelsinger's oust reportedly came after Intel's board expressed frustration with the slow progress of his efforts to revive the company. Gelsinger was reportedly given the choice to retire or be dismissed. Intel has formed a search committee to oversee the process of selecting its next CEO. While deliberations are still in their early stages, the board is expected to make a final decision in the coming weeks. 

There are several candidates under evaluation. Although no decision has been made, Lip-Bu Tan, a veteran investor in the technology industry and former CEO of Cadence Design Systems, has emerged as a potential candidate. Tan previously played a key role in transforming Cadence into a thriving business and has a lot of respect in the industry (he even has imec's Lifetime of Innovation Award), which makes him a strong contender.  

There is a catch, though: while he has invested in various companies, he has never managed a company of Intel's size that develops its own range of products and produces chips. Also, it is unclear which goals the board has for Intel's next chief executive and how much time they have. Pat Gelsinger served as Intel CEO for 3.5 years, and transforming a company of Intel's size takes a long time. In fact, all the products that Intel has now were developed before Gelsinger's tenure. 

Lip-Bu Tan served on Intel's board for nearly two years after joining it in September 2022 and later taking on expanded responsibilities related to manufacturing operations. During his time on Intel's board, Lip-Bu Tan reportedly clashed with Pat Gelsinger over various issues, including workforce size, the company's strategy for contract manufacturing, and its internal culture. These disagreements eventually led to Tan's departure in August 2023. Despite this, Intel's board has recently reached out to Tan to explore his interest in leading the company, Reuters reports. 

Intel has reportedly declined to comment on the search for Pat Gelsinger's replacement, as the search is a process that is meant to remain confidential. Similarly, Lip-Bu Tan and representatives from his venture capital firm, Walden Catalyst, have not issued any statements. 

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • YSCCC
    ah right, getting a investment focused person over engineer personale is one of the dumbest move move for a tech company where it took years to let tech mature
    Reply
  • pclaughton
    A company the size of Intel has an economy almost like a country. The next CEO's first 2-3 years will be entirely the result of Gelsinger's tenure, so it seems crazy to cut the guy now.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    pclaughton said:
    A company the size of Intel has an economy almost like a country. The next CEO's first 2-3 years will be entirely the result of Gelsinger's tenure, so it seems crazy to cut the guy now.
    And by extension, nearly everything that happened during Gelsinger's stay was basically the result of stuff that happened before he even took the reigns. It's the board of directors doing the usual thing: It wants profits, now, and when profits are way down because of bad decisions made a decade ago, the current CEO gets to take the blame.

    I think there are worse options than Lip-Bu Tan, but I'm not sure who would actually be a lot better. He has technical chops and he also has a lot of connections. The latter could very well be more important than the former as a CEO.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    Intel's board is largely made up of members with software backgrounds and investment bankers. That's not faith inspiring when looking for an outside CEO to turn around a semiconductor company.
    Reply
  • AndrewJacksonZA
    smh.

    JarredWaltonGPU said:
    ...Lip-Bu Tan... has a lot of connections. The latter could very well be more important than the former as a CEO.
    He just might need them. Not just for company deals, beating back ARM, and governmental contracts, but I also just read in the news of mineral export bans from/to various countries because politics will politic, and unfortunately for tech companies, politics is extremely relevant to their bottom lines.

    And more importantly, shareholders' returns on their investments.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    JamesJones44 said:
    Intel's board is largely made up of members with software backgrounds and investment bankers. That's not faith inspiring when looking for an outside CEO to turn around a semiconductor company.
    I will defer to my cohort Paul on this one, as I don't really know much about various CEOs / executives. Here's a convo regarding Lip-Bu:
    -------------
    Lip-Bu Tan could be the savior, dude knows how to run a fab. He is royalty in the chip world. The only person more revered is Morris Chang. He understands the way the fab networks work.

    He has been involved in all kinds of startups and chip companies spanning decades. He gets it. He is an industry guy. So the rumor is that Lip-Bu Tan left the board to run a committee studying how, when, and if Intel should spin off the fabs. He is a big proponent of that, at least according to said rumors, and had disagreements with Gelsinger about that strategy.

    So, if Lip-Bu is in fact their pick, one could assume they would plan to spin off fabs. As CEO of Cadence, he interacted with the entire third-party foundry industry. Like, he knows the people, he has connections, he knows how to do things. He would be a superb pick.

    https://www.imec-int.com/en/press/jim-morgan-and-lip-bu-tan-receive-imecs-lifetime-innovation-award-------------

    And my personal take? Even someone with all the right connections and background may not be able to succeed, given Gelsinger failed. And spinning off the fabs is still messy business, could impact CHIPS Act funding, etc. Even after AMD split off GloFo, it was years before the albatross around AMD's neck due to prior contracts went away, and the same would likely happen with Intel.
    Reply
  • UnforcedERROR
    AndrewJacksonZA said:
    but I also just read in the news of mineral export bans from/to various countries because politics will politic, and unfortunately for tech companies, politics is extremely relevant to their bottom lines.
    Eh, this isn't a political argument so I'm sure you're fine. It's very relevant to the space. China's bans can potentially impact this sector tremendously, and it's driven by political decisions (which they've openly admitted). I think it's a relevant point to make, personally.
    Reply
  • 93QSD5
    pclaughton said:
    A company the size of Intel has an economy almost like a country. The next CEO's first 2-3 years will be entirely the result of Gelsinger's tenure, so it seems crazy to cut the guy now.
    They aren't stupid, maybe we are the ones who are dumb.

    Think about it. Maybe they fired Gelsinger after he was on a path to fix things. They basically steal all the credit and keep all the future profits near the top, by putting a greed-head into the seat, right as the recovery might start to look likely.

    Sounds like planned robbery to me. The only losers are the customers
    Reply
  • subspruce
    YSCCC said:
    ah right, getting a investment focused person over engineer personale is one of the dumbest move move for a tech company where it took years to let tech mature
    and we have seen it before cough cough Brian Krzanich
    Reply
  • phead128
    pclaughton said:
    A company the size of Intel has an economy almost like a country. The next CEO's first 2-3 years will be entirely the result of Gelsinger's tenure, so it seems crazy to cut the guy now.
    The Board gave him 4 years (Pat served 3 years 10 months) to pursue his aggressive "5 nodes in 4 years" plan. We saw 20A got cancelled, 18A is only 10% yield. The original plan is not 5 nodes in 6-7 years, at an unsustainable burn-rate of $17 billion per quarter! Let's Pat be accountable to his own timeline.
    Reply