Raspberry Pi Pico W Review: Built-in Wi-Fi Comes to Pico

For just $6, you get a Wi-Fi-enabled microcontroller.

Raspberry Pi Pico W
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Solid hardware, good software, and Wi-Fi access see this incremental update elevate the Raspberry Pi Pico to a truly versatile development board.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Solid hardware

  • +

    Backwards compatibility

  • +

    Wi-Fi connects effortlessly

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    No Bluetooth

  • -

    Micro USB

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

It is fair to say that when the Raspberry Pi Pico arrived in late January 2021, it had two glaring omissions. First was a lack of reset button (of course you can add your own) but the biggest omission was Wi-Fi. In an age of thumbnail sized IoT boards, it felt like the Raspberry Pi Pico was behind the times. In our Raspberry Pi Pico review we marked the lack of Wi-Fi as a con, but we still love the $4 microcontroller that brought the RP2040 SoC to the world.

With a surprise June 2022 release, we see a new Raspberry Pi Pico, this time correcting one of the omissions. The Raspberry Pi Pico W is a $6 microcontroller that looks much like its predecessor, but under a tiny silver case lies a Wi-Fi chip which takes the Pico into the world of IoT. It may not be the first RP2040 board to offer Wi-Fi –  but we are sure that the Raspberry Pi Pico W is going to go straight onto our list of best RP2040 boards.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Les Pounder
Associate Editor

Les Pounder is an associate editor at Tom's Hardware. He is a creative technologist and for seven years has created projects to educate and inspire minds both young and old. He has worked with the Raspberry Pi Foundation to write and deliver their teacher training program "Picademy".

  • rdmyldrmr
    Excuse me but how micro USB instead of USB-C can be considered as a disadvantage for a microcontroller? Seriously?
    Reply
  • Findecanor
    I have a bad feeling about this ...

    From a security perspective, connecting a device to the Internet and not making sure in software that it gets regular security updates is generally considered a baaad idea.

    Better to put the Internet capability on a Raspberry PI W or bigger, and use local communication to the microcontroller.

    Bluetooth and Zigbee would have been better choices than Wifi and possibly-bluetooth-some-time-in-the-future-maybe.

    rdmyldrmr said:
    Excuse me but how micro USB instead of USB-C can be considered as a disadvantage for a microcontroller? Seriously?
    Only because most of the world is going towards USB-C only.

    Micro-USB B used to have a reputation for breaking, but that was because the original implementation was only SMD-mounted. The connector in the Pico has a through-hole mounted shield for durability like USB-C.
    Now that lots of people have used USB-C daily, there are many accounts of that breaking too, and USB-C has more, smaller pins, so what is the more durable, is up to question.
    Reply
  • Mangocats
    Admin said:
    Raspberry Pi Pico W Review: Built-in Wi-Fi Comes to Pico

    Would have been nice to learn something about power draw and/or WiFi range/performance in your review.
    Reply