External Graphics Upgrade for Notebooks

Modifying the ViDock for use with other graphics cards: the Radeon 2600 XT and 3870

Without faster graphics cards to test through the ViDock’s ExpressCard interface, it’s difficult to judge exactly how much of an impact the slower bus has on performance. To that end, let’s see if we can do a few modifications and help the ViDock accommodate some faster video cards. (Of course, this sort of thing will almost certainly void your warranty, so it’s not something we’d recommend by any stretch of the imagination.)

With the ViDock open, it’s easy to imagine taking out the stock Radeon 2600 PRO and substituting a more powerful video card. The cards we chose to put in the ViDock would have to be Radeons to work with the driver, so we chose a Sapphire 2600 XT and an HIS 3870 to work with.

The 2600 XT was quite easy to integrate into the ViDock chassis. The large silent heat sink was a bit too large to fit in the enclosure, but we simply ran it with the enclosure off of the unit. Since the 2600XT doesn’t require a separate power connector, it was that simple.

The Radeon 3870 was another kettle of fish entirely, though. The large card interfered with some of the parts on the ViDock chassis that had to be temporarily removed. In addition, the 3870 requires its own dedicated power cable; to get the card to work, we had to hotwire a separate power supply to provide the 3870 with the juice it needed to run. This was not a very practical solution for real use, but we figured it would get us through the benchmarks.

After we got things going, we recorded the following data.

vidock expresscard graphics

3dMark shows us the ExpressCard bandwidth bottleneck as clear as day. The Radeon 3870 should be getting scores many times that of the 2600 PRO in the stock ViDock, but instead we saw only a subtle increase in performance. The 2600 PRO is looking like a good match for the slow ExpressCard bus.

vidock expresscard graphics

Prey shows us a close representation of what 3dMark just displayed: the ExpressCard bus is limiting the faster video cards so that they perform very close to the 2600 PRO that comes with the ViDock Pro.

vidock expresscard graphics

At low settings, Crysis shows us a curious drop in performance for the Radeon 3870 compared to its slower 2600 brethren. This puzzling scenario defies explanation.

vidock expresscard graphics

At the shader intensive medium settings, the 3870 takes its rightful place at the head of the pack. But it’s important to note that the 3870 can’t even muster enough power to play Crysis at medium settings at 1024x768, again because of the ExpressCard bus’s relatively low bandwidth.

vidock expresscard graphics

Professional 3D applications show us more of the same story: the ExpressCard bus severely limits the performance of the Radeon 2600 XT and 3870. It’s no wonder that ViDock offers the Radeon 2600 PRO in the fastest ViDock model, as anything more is a waste of money and would just require more power to run.

  • a 6pack in
    thats a nice work around for 3d graphics on laptops. but at the 429 price tag plus the price of a 8600gt or a 3870.. thats getting pricy.

    its a valid option, but one that a normal user should think twice about.

    nice write up
    Reply
  • crazyhandpuppet
    "If your integrated video chipset doesn’t support DHCP, or doesn’t accelerate decoding, it’s not going to play Blu-ray movies."

    Amazing how far DHCP has come over the last few years... Looks like it's already replacing HDCP :)
    Reply
  • cleeve
    DHCP... ugh.

    Sorry, I'm Lisdexic!

    We'll have that fixed real soon. :)

    Reply
  • cleeve
    At $429, it comes with an 8600 GT or 2600 PRO.
    Reply
  • gwolfman
    Did they beat ASUS to the punch? When is this product available?
    Reply
  • gwolfman
    No Call of Duty 4 benchmarks? :*(
    Reply
  • cleeve
    Call of Duty 4 is so much easier on hardware, I prefer to concentrate on stuff that will really challenge it like Crysis and SupCom so we have a worst-case scenario.
    Reply
  • piratepast40
    There are several interesting points here. The fact that card compatability is dependant on chipset type is interesting but not really shocking. It's (sort of) similar to the hybrid SLI and Crossfire capability of the 780 series chipsets and the way the chipsets support specific GPU series. It sounds as though another header or bus type is needed to fully support the concept. The expresscard/USB bus was the holdup a year ago and it appears to still be the main bottleneck. I'm curious to see if AMD's PUMA platform or Intel's version (forgot the name) will show us something in this area. Am also wondering if one of the laptop OEM's might offer the external card setup for specific models of their computers. Will be interesting to see what others are doing. Haven't heard anything at all from ASUS since early last year.
    Reply
  • spuddyt
    would it be possible to run crossfire/sli with two of these things? (largely out of curiosity, twould be insane to actuall sensibly do it...) That way wouldn't you have 2 seperate pcie 1x bandwidths to play with/
    Reply
  • anonymous x
    aww, i wish the express card slot had enough bandwidth to suport a geforce 9800 card
    Reply