Researchers demo 'Thought-to-Text' AI system that doesn't use invasive, permanent, and surgically-implanted devices like Elon's Neuralink

DeWave in Action, translating brainwaves to text.
(Image credit: Thomas Do via YouTube)

Researchers from the GrapheneX-UTS (University of Technology Sydney) Human-Centric Artificial Intelligence Centre have demonstrated a non-intrusive way of translating human thought into text and speech. The researchers say the portable device uses an in-house developed AI called 'DeWave.' 

The feat is achievable using a portable and non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG) headset connected to a multitasking-capable EEG encoder to detect coherent, readable sentences from brainwaves. It identifies and captures information from the raw EEG waves and passes them through a specially designed and trained AI to process waveform EEG signals into text. Importantly, this innovation was tested on 29 participants, showing that this technology can be used with different people — this is important because all individuals have unique EEG brain signals.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Roshan Ashraf Shaikh
Contributing Writer

Roshan Ashraf Shaikh has been in the Indian PC hardware community since the early 2000s and has been building PCs, contributing to many Indian tech forums, & blogs. He operated Hardware BBQ for 11 years and wrote news for eTeknix & TweakTown before joining Tom's Hardware team. Besides tech, he is interested in fighting games, movies, anime, and mechanical watches.

  • bit_user
    The researchers say the portable device uses an in-house developed AI called 'DeWave.'
    Oh no they didn't...https://www.dwavesys.com
    I don't know anyone who natively thinks in such complete and pithy sentences.

    ...at least, if they do, they don't talk like it!

    The researchers also say there are challenges as the current system is only 40% efficient.
    I'm sure they mean "accurate".

    The team is confident it can boost its efficiency up to 90%.
    How can you be so confident about something so difficult, before you've done it?

    Better Than Elon's Invasive, Permanent and Controversial Neuralink?
    I think implants will always have an advantage. I don't see how you can ever do as well with electrodes. Their algorithms & processing technology might be more sophisticated, but I'll bet they'd see immediate accuracy improvements by applying them to the Neuralink implants.
    Reply
  • edzieba
    EEG cannot feed back to neurons, so comparing an EEG-based output only device to any sort of direct BCI (Neuralink or otherwise) is about as useful as comparing a monitor to a mouse.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    edzieba said:
    EEG cannot feed back to neurons,
    Not necessarily needed, for this. If feedback were involved, you'd get it by looking at the monitor and reading how your thought was interpreted.

    edzieba said:
    so comparing an EEG-based output only device to any sort of direct BCI (Neuralink or otherwise) is about as useful as comparing a monitor to a mouse.
    Bad analogy. A better one would be monitor vs. VR headset. Or normal mouse vs. haptic-enhanced mouse.
    Reply