Is Wi-Fi bad for the environment? Eye-catching London ad suggests Wi-Fi is ‘damaging the climate’

TP-Link Archer BE9700 Wi-Fi 7 router
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

A PhD student shared a photograph of an ad for the University of East London, implying that Wi-Fi is detrimental to the environment (h/t vx-underground). The poster says, “WiFi doesn’t grow on trees. Your screen time is damaging the climate.” Although it’s easy to assume that it’s telling us that wireless networking is bad for the environment, a second look at the message focuses more on the time we spend in front of our phones, tablets, smart TVs, and computers, rather than on the Wi-Fi transmission itself.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • Alex/AT
    Well, 5G power consumption is even more than wifi, so it doesn't grow on trees either.
    Reply
  • Ralston18
    Read more = "No".

    Not even going to click that link.

    At face value, I doubt that the "ad" and its' contents are worth expending any further time and energy on.

    Likely it will all show up on some mass media as a FUD story anyway.....

    Between commercials.
    Reply
  • Notton
    I think the ad is too clever for its own good.
    je ne sais quoi, "worded smugly"

    I'm not saying it's a 1:1 comparison to the age old proverb "A schemer is sometimes caught in his own trap", but to quote George Carlin, "Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."

    Most people will look at that ad, get outraged because of the wording, and then never think or look any further into it.
    Reply
  • Alex/AT
    Actually what I've wanted to say is that wifi, with its on-demand and short range usage, is more effective than any of the wide mobile technologies we have.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    There would be some truth to saying that anything at all that uses electricity is bad for the environment.

    These people ought to be saying more about the crazy levels of electricity required to run AI.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Ah yes, Aunt Jane's Candy Crush time and my Plex media server and your RTX 5090 gaming rig is doing so much more damage to the environment than those Cryptominers, hyperscale data centers, and even the millions of PCs which aren't turned off or slept overnight.

    Not to mention all the time people spend reading clickbaity articles.

    :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
    Reply
  • JTWrenn
    A bit ham fisted but I don't think this is a wifi hurts the environment ad. It's you use more electricity getting on the internet than you think, done poorly. Maybe some acknowledgement that it's not just your router that you are powering to get online.
    Reply
  • magbarn
    ezst036 said:
    There would be some truth to saying that anything at all that uses electricity is bad for the environment.

    These people ought to be saying more about the crazy levels of electricity required to run AI.
    This is it right here. We have states who will be sending more electricity to Ai server farms than all the people living in the state uses combined.
    Reply
  • jackt
    AND for health ! (and security)
    Reply
  • drrich2
    If people weren't doing this, they might be out driving around generating CO2. They won't just sit around passively meditating. First world nation human existence is not a zero emissions' undertaking, and of all the concerns on my mental dance card for the day, this will not make the list.
    Reply