China simulated a Starlink blockade over Taiwan that uses around 2,000 drones with jammers to create an 'electromagnetic shield' — CCP scientists devise potential plan to cut off satellite internet to the island

Starlink hardware
(Image credit: SpaceX, Starlink)

A Chinese study has outlined how the nation could jam Starlink access across the entirety of the island of Taiwan. It would require around 1,000 to 2,000 specially adapted electronic warfare drones for this hostile act to pay off, reports the South China Morning Post (SCMP). The research, taken in tandem with recent news about China’s advanced internet cable-cutting capabilities, ratchets geopolitical and world semiconductor ecosystem tensions even higher.

Zhejiang University & Beijing Institute of Technology ran simulations to determine how the CCP-controlled People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could deny their democratic foe’s access to Starlink. Musk’s constellation of 10,000-plus satellites has been a source of consternation among CCP strategists ever since Ukraine effectively made use of it to resist the Russian invaders. Access to tech like Starlink is just one of the speed bumps that have made Putin’s 3-day "Special Operation" extend towards a grueling near-four-year campaign.

1,000 – 2,000 electronic warfare drones

According to the Chinese scientists, the complex, ever-changing satellite mesh networking coverage provided by Starlink could only be countered by a broad distributed jamming strategy. “Hundreds or thousands of small, synchronized jammers would need to be deployed across the sky – on drones, balloons or aircraft – forming an electromagnetic shield over the battlefield,” reports the SCMP.

To reach their unhappy-for-the-PLA conclusion, the scientists used actual Starlink data to create a simulated dynamic satellite mesh the size of Taiwan over 12 hours. A mix of wide and narrow-beam electronic noise-generating jammers featured in the test simulation. Airborne Chinese jammers, situated around 3 to 6 miles apart from each other, could form an effective 12-mile-high internet blocking mesh, it is now thought.

Under ideal conditions, a successful Chinese Starlink blockade would require 935 coordinated interference nodes, suggests the research. With cheaper, more practical, lower-power drones, the number of airborne interferers would have to be scaled up to approximately 2,000 drones.

Starlink hardware

(Image credit: SpaceX, Starlink)

Taiwan’s drone defenses

Of course, hostile blanket drone coverage wouldn’t exist unopposed in Taiwan’s skies. The home of computer and semiconductor giants like TSMC, Asus, and MediaTek has been investing in both foreign-bought and domestically produced drone and anti-drone military equipment.

The ambitious and industrious Silicon Island (and aspiring 'AI island') might even be considering its own Iron Dome-inspired protective network, no doubt further infuriating its neighbor.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • derekullo
    So Taiwan would effectively be playing Bloons TD6 but IRL !!!
    Reply
  • GenericUser2001
    Any drone that is broadcasting radio waves strongly enough to be an effective jamming device will also be incredibly easy to detect to anyone with radio equipment. Taiwan mostly just needs a bunch of the radio targeting equipment set up with their anti-aircraft/drone weapons.
    Reply
  • Nashville Paul
    What goes up must come down.
    All of the drones or whatever is attached to a balloon would effectively become missiles.
    2000 objects coming down on a population seems like a bad idea or act of war or maybe just littering.
    Reply
  • Gino188
    I find it weird that they would publish these kinds of papers for everyone and not do it internally.
    Reply
  • thisisaname
    Gino188 said:
    I find it weird that they would publish these kinds of papers for everyone and not do it internally.
    A threat is only a threat if the one you are threatening hears it and doing it this way means they are not directly threatening them.
    SO they can threaten them while saying they are not threatening them.
    Reply
  • zsydeepsky
    Gino188 said:
    I find it weird that they would publish these kinds of papers for everyone and not do it internally.
    Because this type of threat can only be countered by an industry capability similar to China's.
    Yes, any drone that emits strong radio signals can be easily targeted by anti-drone missiles, but how MANY missiles can you have and deploy?
    If China truly enters a war capacity, it probably can manufacture 10K+ such drones PER DAY, so, how many missiles can its opponents make?
    Reply