Holding back China's chipmaking progress is a fool’s errand, says U.S. Commerce Secretary

China Chips
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo said in an interview that the country should focus more on investments in domestic innovation than applying bans and sanctions. “Trying to hold China back is a fool’s errand,” said the politician. She also added that the Biden administration’s CHIPS and Science Act, which led the country to spend more money on building out its chip infrastructure than the past 28 years combined, “matters more than export controls.” Nevertheless, the Wall Street Journal says President Biden still pushed for bans and sanctions against Chinese firms and even urged its allies, including the Netherlands and Japan, to stop China from acquiring advanced tech, especially those containing American tech.

“The only way to beat China is to stay ahead of them,” said Sec. Raimondo. “We have to run faster, out innovate them. That’s the way to win.” Despite the various export controls that the U.S. has applied against several Chinese companies, many of its companies are still able to procure banned chips through the black market and unofficial conduits. Aside from that, Chinese innovation is seemingly continuing, with many businesses and organizations forced to be creative in pursuing their goals despite the roadblocks posed by American sanctions.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • punkncat
    To me, and at surface value, it seems pretty un-capitalistic to hold back someone else by way of artificial restraints. I mean, every man for himself and all, but price and quality should be the determiners here IMHO. With that said, there is a significant security concern in this case as well so it is quite complicated.
    Reply
  • Geef
    No need to hold them back... we can just make a basic rule so they play nice.

    'We'll only hold your country back by 1 month... for each piece of IP your country has stolen...'
    Reply
  • usertests
    punkncat said:
    To me, and at surface value, it seems pretty un-capitalistic to hold back someone else by way of artificial restraints. I mean, every man for himself and all, but price and quality should be the determiners here IMHO. With that said, there is a significant security concern in this case as well so it is quite complicated.
    Unregulated capitalism has never been tried.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    punkncat said:
    To me, and at surface value, it seems pretty un-capitalistic to hold back someone else by way of artificial restraints.
    I'd say state-sponsored IP theft is even more uncapitalistic. At some point, it demands a response. The WTO courts have been tried and that path hasn't worked out, so what else do you do? Just roll over and let yourself get eaten alive?

    For capitalism to work properly, everyone needs to be playing by certain ground rules.
    Reply