Intel's new CEO warns employees about 'tough decisions', but Wall Street cheers

Lip-Bu Tan, chief executive of Intel
(Image credit: Intel)

The appointment of Lip-Bu Tan as Intel's chief executive has generally pleased investors and financial analysts, but employees expressed mixed feelings following Tan's initial address, in which he hinted at tough decisions ahead but offered limited clarity on his strategic vision, reports Oregon Live.

Tan, who reportedly stepped down from Intel's board last August because he expected then-CEO Pat Gelsinger to make Intel leaner, is widely expected to make significant job cuts to reduce costs.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • Notton
    If he wants to focus on AI, that means he's keeping the GPU division.... right?
    Reply
  • King_V
    When I hear things like "tough decisions" and then a lot of buzzwords and corporate-speak, and I hear about Wall Street cheering, then it's pretty much a given that "layoffs now for a quick stock price boost" is the strategy.

    The ONLY thing that is anything like relief is:
    While Intel announced cuts affecting over 15% of its workforce, Tan believed the reductions were insufficient and should have targeted middle management, which he viewed as a barrier to innovation.

    That is the only thing that sounds atypical of the usual "make everyone at the bottom suffer for the mistakes made by those above them" strategy. Everything else, though, sounds like the typical cliche of the people who DIDN'T make mistakes, and who will be most harmed by losing their positions, are the ones who will lose their jobs.
    Reply
  • DS426
    "During his introductory video call, Tan — Intel's first external CEO in its 57-year history —emphasized satisfying customers and shareholders. However, his appearance sparked some criticism, as he wore a shirt from his former company, Cadence Design Systems, instead of one carrying the Intel logo."
    That's a pretty big leadership failure right from the get-go; quite a morale tanker if you ask me.

    Also, he's expected to make yet more significant job cuts? Maybe they should let the dust settle for a few quarters before making any rash decisions. It sounds like Intel has a bean-counting CEO on their hands, which I don't see playing out very well for them in the long-run.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    He's not wrong about middle management. Too many companies have too many layers between the chiefs and individual contributors that largely just results in internal bickering over turf. For larger companies I personally don't like to see more than 3 layers between IC and C Suite (C->VP->Director->Manager->IC). In an ideal world 2 is really the better maximum (C->VP/Director->Manager/Director->IC).

    Too many layers results in the C suite being completely disconnected from what is actually occurring within the company and internal politics generating too much non-functional work for the individual contributors.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    So chopping block it is, LOL.

    And this: "Tan believed the reductions were insufficient and should have targeted middle management, which he viewed as a barrier to innovation". I'm starting to like him even more :D

    Joking aside, there are some obvious ways he can do the chopping, but with very significant impact. One immediate one is do the "Alphabet" strategy and make the foundries and design houses their own spin-off Companies under the same parent, still Intel. Kind of like Altera is right now. Pros and Cons, but at least should be the path of least resistance.

    And since he's choosing the 'chopping block' strat, unless the axe is swift and heavy, we won't see anything relevant in the next few Q's in terms of revenue (outside of cost saving measures).

    Regards.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    DS426 said:
    Also, he's expected to make yet more significant job cuts? Maybe they should let the dust settle for a few quarters before making any rash decisions. It sounds like Intel has a bean-counting CEO on their hands, which I don't see playing out very well for them in the long-run.
    It's necessary to counter the high cost of building new fabs, it's not a rash decision it's continuing what has started when the fab constructions began.
    Also counting your beans is extremely important unless you own a bean farm that can produce infinite beans at any moment.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    -Fran- said:
    And since he's choosing the 'chopping block' strat, unless the axe is swift and heavy, we won't see anything relevant in the next few Q's in terms of revenue (outside of cost saving measures).
    Completely different segments...cost savings don't show up in revenue, or vice versa.
    Reply
  • DS426
    TerryLaze said:
    It's necessary to counter the high cost of building new fabs, it's not a rash decision it's continuing what has started when the fab constructions began.
    Also counting your beans is extremely important unless you own a bean farm that can produce infinite beans at any moment.
    That's Intel's challenge then, isn't it, as TSMC can focus on building fabs while Intel has real products to develop across all sorts of XPU's, FPGA's and networking, and so on.

    Yes, workforce reduction can certainly be done, but it will come at some other cost.

    As for middle management: I don't disagree that even an org as large as Intel doesn't need (and shouldn't have) tons of management layers between C-levels and the common engineers and office workers. I guess I'm just surprised that after a 15% labor reduction, there's still room to cut more. I guess that only shows how overbloated they really were before. Well, at least if one is to believe everything that's coming out of Tan's mouth. Again, I'm already a skeptic based on his shirt choice, even as silly as that might sound to some of you.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    -Fran- said:
    And since he's choosing the 'chopping block' strat, unless the axe is swift and heavy, we won't see anything relevant in the next few Q's in terms of revenue (outside of cost saving measures).

    Luckily axing people doesn't generate revenue. If it did every company would take a big axe to the workforce every day :). Thankfully it only affects profitability, so long as it doesn't hurt productivity.
    Reply
  • vanadiel007
    I am afraid this is the beginning of the end for Intel. Which will result in very interesting situations for the PC world.
    We might see PC's run on a completely different architecture and Operating System in 5 years from now.
    Reply