Pat Gelsinger turns to particle accelerators for a new way to make chips, joins xLight
xLight aims to deliver a powerful alternative LPP source for ASML EUV tools by 2028.

Legendary Intel CTO and CEO Pat Gelsinger is now serving as executive chairman at xLight, a startup developing a free electron laser (FEL) technology as a light source for extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography systems.
Using a particle accelerator to generate light for litho machines has been discussed previously, but xLight claims it can produce such a source by 2028 — while maintaining compatibility with existing tools.
"As part of my new role at Playground Global, I have joined xLight as executive chairman of the board," Gelsinger wrote in a LinkedIn post. "I will be working closely with Nicholas Kelez and team to build the world’s most powerful Free Electron Lasers (FEL) by leveraging particle accelerator technology."
EUV lithography is an advanced technique used for semiconductor manufacturing to create extremely small — we are talking about an 8nm resolution for High-NA EUV and a ~13nm for Low-NA EUV — circuit patterns on silicon wafers that uses EUV light with a 13.5nm wavelength. At present, only ASML can build EUV litho systems and these use an intricate way of producing light with a 13.5nm wavelength.
There is more than one way to create a light with an extremely short wavelength to produce chips with an 8nm ~ 13.5nm resolution, however. One of them is to use a particle accelerator as a laser produced plasma (LPP) light source.
xLight has created an LPP source that delivers four times the power of the most advanced systems available today, according to the Gelsinger's post. ASML's Twinscan NXE:3600D has a 250W LPP source, whereas the NXE:3800E is equipped with a ~300W source.
While ASML has demonstrated EUV source powers above 500W in research settings, these higher power levels are not yet available in commercially deployed systems. Yet ASML continues to work towards increasing EUV source power, with plans to double output to 600W and a roadmap extending beyond 1,000W.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Apparently, xLight and Gelsinger claim that the company has an LPP source that is beyond 1,000W today and that will be ready for commercial applications by 2028.
Gelsinger claims that xLight's technology cuts per-wafer costs by around 50% and lowers both capital and operating expenses by threefold, which is a major leap in manufacturing efficiency. While we do know the approximate price of ASML's Twinscan NXE:3800E (around $240 - $250 million), we do cannot really guess the price of the light source alone.
Meanwhile, the claim that the new LPP source can lower capital expenses and operating costs by three times can potentially mean a substantial decrease of a FEL-based litho tool cost compared to today's machines from ASML.
Speaking of ASML, it is important to note that xLight does not aim to replace ASML's EUV litho tools, but produce an LPP source that "will be connected to an ASML scanner and running wafers by 2028." This may mean that xLight's LPP source will be compatible with existing ASML tools, but it is unclear whether it will be compatible with next-generation High-NA EUV tools (most probably yes, as they use the same LPP sources as existing Low-NA EUV tools). It also remains to be seen whether xLight's LPP source can be attached to TwinScan machines in fab environments.
Remember that fabs are built to accommodate specific tools and in case of Low-NA EUV systems it means that the light source is located below the machine itself, whereas in case of High-NA EUV tool its LPP source is located on the same level, so any 'third party' LPP source has to take these facts into account. For now, the particle accelerator looks rather big for existing fabs, so FEL is probably applicable for next generation of fabs if it is proved efficient.
It is noteworthy that while xLight believes that its FEL technology represents a multi-billion-dollar opportunity in the long term, it also opens near-term revenue in other key areas. The company believes that its systems are well-suited for high-power metrology and inspection tools. Perhaps, even beyond semiconductors, as it can address challenges in national security and biotech: from point defense and space debris control to medical imaging and scientific research.

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
Zaranthos "according to the Gelsinger's post." according to Gelsinger's post.Reply
"we do cannot really guess" we cannot really guess.
Also the grammar, sentence structure, and comma placements make it look like it was typed up rather quickly before coffee kicked in or lack of sleep. :) -
kjfatl The equipment shown in the photo is huge. If the light source is similar in size, would it fit in existing fabs? If not, this would favor a company building new fabs from the ground up over one with a large existing base of fabs.Reply -
pug_s Not sure if it is any different than what the Chinese are doing with euv using ssmb (Steady-State Microbunching Extreme Ultraviolet)Reply -
Mr Majestyk Hard to see anyone making the particle accelerator cheaper than an AMSL EUV device. Sure higher power will allow lower costs per wafer, but it's only part of the cost equation. These particle accelerators for EUV and X-ray tend to be very large up to a few hundred metres. A promising new method of producing LPP is the ERL an energy recovery linear accelerator. Is this what xLight is trying to commercialise and reduce in size?Reply -
bit_user
Woah, let's not get ahead of ourselves!The article said:Legendary Intel CTO and CEO Pat Gelsinger ...
🤣
Oh, interesting. Yeah, zap those space debris!The article said:... it can address challenges in national security and biotech: from point defense and space debris control to ... -
endocine
LOL. I guess that company that hired him wanted to go bankrupt toobit_user said:Woah, let's not get ahead of ourselves!
🤣
Oh, interesting. Yeah, zap those space debris! -
JRStern Everyone needs a hobby.Reply
Now if they can also shorten the wavelength to super-extreme-UV (aka soft x-rays), that might be more interesting.
Maybe this FEL is tunable?
I've never looked into this stuff in any detail, questions occur to me about the whole approach ...