TSMC employees arrested, could face up to 12 years in jail, $3 million fine over alleged attempt to leak 2nm chip details — first case under Taiwan's amended National Security Act cites 'serious suspicions of violating national security laws'

TSMC logo and biker head.
(Image credit: Getty / Anadolu)

Two employees of major semiconductor manufacturer and design company TSMC, as well as one former employee, have been arrested over claims they stole proprietary technology, according to the Financial Times. This is the first trade secrets case to be filed under Taiwan's new national security law, which is designed to clamp down on the sale and theft of trade secrets of "national core technologies," from the country's hugely important chip design sector.

Taiwan is home to much of the world's chip design and fabrication infrastructure, headed by TSMC's cutting-edge facilities and intellectual property. In recent years, it has leapt ahead of traditional rivals Samsung and Intel and now produces most of the world's most advanced silicon. That makes it a key target for IP theft, however, and over the years, TSMC has struggled with engineers defecting to competitors and taking trade secrets with them.

Jon Martindale
Freelance Writer

Jon Martindale is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. For the past 20 years, he's been writing about PC components, emerging technologies, and the latest software advances. His deep and broad journalistic experience gives him unique insights into the most exciting technology trends of today and tomorrow.

  • Marlin1975
    I hate theft... but if more tech like this was more common it would help more people. It be at the cost of "profits" for the company that was first but even the most capitalist person has to admit whats best for people is not best for profits.

    I still dislike intel for example. But if they disappear cost will go up and innovation may drop more.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    Hasn't 18A already entered risk production, so isn't TSMC 2nm technically a trailing node?
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    Marlin1975 said:
    I hate theft... but if more tech like this was more common it would help more people. It be at the cost of "profits" for the company that was first but even the most capitalist person has to admit whats best for people is not best for profits.

    I still dislike intel for example. But if they disappear cost will go up and innovation may drop more.
    Your problematic logic of theft is good as long as it benefits me notwithstanding; such technology would not end up in the hands of those who would help the regular man. The highest bidder on the black market for such intellectual property would be the you know who, and them guys don’t have altruistic intentions.
    Reply
  • call101010
    Elusive Ruse said:
    Your problematic logic of theft is good as long as it benefits me notwithstanding; such technology would not end up in the hands of those who would help the regular man. The highest bidder on the black market for such intellectual property would be the you know who, and them guys don’t have altruistic intentions.
    I dont remember anyone was paid for the wheel invention ... Knowledge should be for free ... it is accumulation of human knowledge built upon each other.
    Patent for sure slows down science and development.

    More over , only rich people can patent their ideas
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    call101010 said:
    Knowledge should be for free ...
    When it costs billions to develop said knowledge, it is beyond ridiculous to expect anyone to give it away for free without at the very least recouping their investment. You know what really slows down science and development? No prospects for a positive financial return.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    Marlin1975 said:
    I hate theft... but if more tech like this was more common it would help more people. It be at the cost of "profits" for the company that was first but even the most capitalist person has to admit whats best for people is not best for profits.

    I still dislike intel for example. But if they disappear cost will go up and innovation may drop more.
    What would anyone do with tech "like this?" If all the relevant information was published on the internet, it's not like we're going to see people building functional 2nm fabs in their basement. There are very few entities with the financial resources to make use of this technology. Even with the money, you'd still need a large team of highly skilled engineers that probably aren't sitting around looking for a job.
    Reply
  • umeng2002_2
    To be honest TSMC being relevant is a national security issue for them. Most of wall street now depends on them.
    Reply
  • Li Ken-un
    call101010 said:
    Patent for sure slows down science and development.
    spongiemaster said:
    You know what really slows down science and development? No prospects for a positive financial return.
    Why not both?

    Patents with reasonable exclusivity periods would:
    Promote innovation by guaranteeing a monopoly or protecting revenue streams. (Whether or not the investment into R & D is actually recouped depends on execution and the market.)
    Contribute to the progress of society by preventing an indefinite monopoly on an innovation.
    Reply
  • magbarn
    spongiemaster said:
    When it costs billions to develop said knowledge, it is beyond ridiculous to expect anyone to give it away for free without at the very least recouping their investment. You know what really slows down science and development? No prospects for a positive financial return.
    This is why we have tons of new "weight loss drugs" and no new antibiotics. There's much more money to be made on temporary weight loss than curing infections resistant to multiple conventional antibiotics.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    magbarn said:
    This is why we have tons of new "weight loss drugs" and no new antibiotics. There's much more money to be made on temporary weight loss than curing infections resistant to multiple conventional antibiotics.
    Obesity is one of the most expensive conditions for the US medical field to treat. Back in 2016, it was estimated to have cost the industry $260 billion. That's more than anything besides heart conditions and we all know many heart conditions are caused directly by obesity, so even that comes with an asterisk. Americans aren't going to start exercising and eating healthy any time soon even though 73.6% of adults are overweight or obese. What infection is currently adversely affecting the health of 3/4's of the American adult population? By comparison, about 40% of Americans will get cancer during their lifetime. That's what makes the weight loss drugs so prevalent in the industry.
    Reply