TCL boasts about the 'image quality, power consumption, and lifespan' benefits of its latest inkjet-printed OLED displays
Firm aims to reduce the cost of producing OLED panels using an inkjet printing production method.
TCL CSOT, a display manufacturing subsidiary of TCL, is reportedly advancing rapidly in the field of OLED technology by investing heavily in inkjet-printed OLED panels. By adopting inkjet printing technology rather than traditional manufacturing methods, the company is aiming to simplify the OLED production process, thereby reducing costs and allowing for increased flexibility in screen sizes and designs. However, it has been seeing other important benefits.
The traditional method for creating OLED screens relies on vacuum thermal evaporation (VTE), which involves vaporizing organic materials and depositing them onto a substrate in a carefully controlled environment. While effective, this method is expensive, labor-intensive, and results in high material wastage, contributing to the overall cost of OLED displays.
TCL’s approach with inkjet printing instead deposits OLED materials directly onto the display substrate, saving materials and significantly lowering production costs. This shift is expected to streamline the production of OLED panels, making them more affordable and sustainable for a larger range of consumers.
In addition to affordability, TCL’s printed OLED panels promise improved brightness and color vibrancy. Standard OLED panels are known for their deep blacks and excellent color reproduction, but they often struggle with peak brightness compared to technologies like Mini-LED. TCL’s inkjet-printed OLEDs, however, could offer higher brightness levels, as the company claims to cut internal light loss by 50 percent and boost light output efficiency by about 1.5 times. Addressing this limitation can also potentially enhance HDR (high dynamic range) content, allowing for vivid and lifelike visuals with better contrast, especially in brightly lit rooms.
Beyond consumer benefits, TCL’s advancements in inkjet printing could also influence the global display industry by increasing competition with leading OLED manufacturers, like LG and Samsung. While these companies have long dominated the premium OLED space, TCL’s entry could open up the technology to a more budget-friendly segment.
The company is planning to initiate small-scale production of inkjet-printed OLED panels by the end of 2024 with a 21.6-inch 4K OLED panel specifically designed for medical monitors. By 2025, TCL aims to expand this production to include medium-sized OLED panels tailored for IT devices, such as laptops and monitors.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Kunal Khullar is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. He is a long time technology journalist and reviewer specializing in PC components and peripherals, and welcomes any and every question around building a PC.
-
AkroZ TCL have a lead to sell monitors with unknown reliability in the medical field (like chirurgy) ? This seems unresponsable.Reply
Netherless it is several years ago that I have heard that manufacturers tried to print LED monitors but they have too low yield.
Is TCL the first to make a breaktrough or this is just to ask for investors when the yield is so bad that it cost way more to produce than LG and Samsung and they hope to improve it with time ? -
Alvar "Miles" Udell What about the most crucial factor of OLED screens: Durability. Increased brightness should allow it to last longer by surviving more wear leveling cycles, but will it allow a monitor displaying many static elements, such as a computer monitor or medical display (as mentioned in the article) to last, or at least warranty for parts and labor, say 15,000 or 30,000 hours (5 or 10 years at about 8 hours per day of use) without the user having to baby it?Reply -
Jame5 ...company claims to cut internal light loss by 50 percent and boost light output efficiency by about 1.5 times.
That sentence feels redundant. Like whatever press release it was lifted from is trying to hype up the tech but didn't have anything else to say, so they said the same thing 2 different ways back to back. -
Alvar "Miles" Udell Jame5 said:That sentence feels redundant. Like whatever press release it was lifted from is trying to hype up the tech but didn't have anything else to say, so they said the same thing 2 different ways back to back.
Scribbr's AI detector (https://www.scribbr.com/ai-detector/) shows that 100% of the article was likely AI generated. -
Sluggotg I remember when people were hyping that idea that we would be able to buy a specialty inkjet printer and print our own OLED screens, (and they would be flexible). Was that the late 90's?Reply
It will take a while to see if these TCL displays work as well as they say. I am always up for a better display. -
systemBuilder_49 I have a very positive view of TCL and I wish them the best of luck! I have used a TCL 43S405 TV for work everyday for the last 7 years and gave my sister a r613 55 in TV which cost practically nothing ($399) and it is lovely!Reply -
BFG-9000 Didn't LG switch over to inkjet printing OLED screens when they started moving panel production over to China from S Korea back in 2018 with B8/C8 series? For the US, those were often assembled in Mexico using the Chinese panels to minimize tariffs. Those were the first 120Hz models but pretty pointless as they still didn't have HDMI 2.1 so you could only use it in some interpolated mode.Reply
At the time the new inkjet production process was more touted for lower production cost instead of any image quality improvements. Especially when building a new factory, where it was then considered mature enough and way cheaper than building giant vacuum metallization type chambers. -
evdjj3j
I also have a cheap TCL tv that I got during Black Friday about 6-7 years ago that has been great.systemBuilder_49 said:I have a very positive view of TCL and I wish them the best of luck! I have used a TCL 43S405 TV for work everyday for the last 7 years and gave my sister a r613 55 in TV which cost practically nothing ($399) and it is lovely!