Arm Retakes Control of China Operation, Erratic CEO Replaced

Arm China
(Image credit: SCMP)
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • hotaru.hino
    fKcywQQKqqg
    If anyone wants to watch a video about that Chinese law.
    Reply
  • digitalgriffin
    I imagine armed security will accompany the new CEO / manager as he arrives.
    Reply
  • waltc3
    When new businesses hailing from outside China open up inside China, it becomes a running bet to see how long it will take China to try and nationalize the company...;) If they don't quite go that far, they "as good as" nationalize it, while denying nationalizing it. In any event, the IP is forfeited.
    Reply
  • missingxtension
    If you don't have 7 minutes to waste watching the video. It comes down to an archaic law about having a seal or stamp. You have to physically have that in China, like a notary stamp in the US l. Chinese Arm CEO went missing with said stamp seal, so legally it was problematic. So fast forward now, problem solved. You can have your 7 minutes to do all you want with them. Unless you are a slow reader! Watch the video and save time!
    Reply
  • TCA_ChinChin
    missingxtension said:
    If you don't have 7 minutes to waste watching the video. It comes down to an archaic law about having a seal or stamp. You have to physically have that in China, like a notary stamp in the US l. Chinese Arm CEO went missing with said stamp seal, so legally it was problematic. So fast forward now, problem solved. You can have your 7 minutes to do all you want with them. Unless you are a slow reader! Watch the video and save time!
    Seems really weird from a Western perspective, but I guess some Asian countries still have certain laws or customs that take into account those seals/stamps like China or Japan. Still really bad that there isn't or wasn't a better solution other than getting it back. Definitely another hit on Chinese market's already dreadful reputation.
    Reply