SFFWG Renames PCIe SSD SFF-8639 Connector To U.2

The SSD Form Factor Working Group (SFFWG) announced that SFF-8639 will now be referred to as the U.2 connector in a bid to simplify the confusing nomenclature around the new PCIe 3.0 x4 connector. When the first PCIe SSDs came to market they were high cost and relegated to the enterprise market, but the faster speed and lower latency was well worth the price premium.

PCIe SSDs began to make their way into the consumer segment as the price of NAND dropped and SSDs became cheaper, and the industry responded to the limited connectivity options for PCIe SSDs by coming up with the M.2 standard. M.2 defines small form factor SSDs and the small connector that is embedded onto a motherboard and communicates via the PCIe lanes. However, most PCIe SSDs still communicated with the legacy AHCI protocol, regardless of how the SSD was connected to the host. 

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • ragenalien
    Can we get a link to that m.2 adapter?
    Reply
  • utroz
    Nice a name that normalish people can remember, more standards means more adapters I need to have to work on people's systems.. I do like that it has loads of bandwidth and that the cables aren't crazy wide like SCSI or IDE.
    Reply
  • rdc85
    Will this phase out, sata express for desktop / mainstream space.. ?
    (excluding M.2)
    or it will backward compatible..

    since I don't see sata express already mainstream, now there is U.2..
    will have to wait and see which one is stays and which one will gone, before adopting one..

    Reply
  • supremelaw
    Good summary, Paul. Be on the lookout for NVMe PCIe RAID controllers e.g. 4 x Intel 750 in RAID-5.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    Good summary, Paul. Be on the lookout for NVMe PCIe RAID controllers e.g. 4 x Intel 750 in RAID-5.
    Yes, very exciting stuff coming to market! Of course everyone wants to keep a lid on it for now, so most info we cant share yet, but the RAID guys have to stay in business and continue to grow sales, not have them decline, and there is really only one way to do that....
    Reply
  • Uxi
    You mean something like this?
    http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Storage/Five-Intel-SSD-750s-Tested-Two-Million-IOPS-and-10-GBsec-Achievement-Unlocked
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    No, I do not. Those aren't tested in a RAID configuration, instead with each individual card accessed as a separate volume.
    The reason he couldn't hit theoretical limits with RAID configurations? Because the OS isn't optimized for it, and there are issues with MB switching.
    The hardware I am speaking of are dedicated RAID controllers that utilize the U.2 connector.
    Reply