More Xbox first-party games will come to PlayStation and Nintendo — Xbox hardware will remain
And when everyone's on Xbox, no one will be!

Since Microsoft's acquisition of Activision-Blizzard and its smorgasbord of development studios, Microsoft (and thus Xbox) has become the largest third-party game publisher ever. So, recent comments from Xbox head Phil Spencer in an interview with Gamertag Radio indicating that forthcoming Xbox games will be released on other platforms, including Nintendo and PlayStation, have caused a large ripple but also make a lot of sense.
These statements ("I want people to be able to experience the games that we build, the services that we offer on as many devices as we can" and "We obviously love the native experience that we have on our own platform and our own hardware, and that's something that will continue for us") come from Danny Peña's Podcast Interviews on YouTube, where he and Parris of Gamertag Radio discussed the future of Xbox with Phil Spencer. The twenty-six-minute interview is chock-full of industry insights and nostalgia on older periods of Xbox history, including the original Xbox and 360 eras.
Now, a small brief on console history is needed for those who don't know why these statements are controversial. You know Sonic The Hedgehog? The movie character? That guy's actually from a long line of sometimes-beloved and sometimes-hated video games. Until Sonic Adventure 2 got a GameCube port, those video games and many others were always exclusive to Sega consoles. Dreamcast was the last Sega home console, and unfortunately, was met with a quick death at the hands of Sony's far more powerful PlayStation 2, quickly relegating Sega to a mere third-party developer...whose place in the market was swiftly taken by Microsoft's Xbox.
In the earliest stages of the "DirectX Box" that would eventually become the first Xbox, the system maintained backward compatibility with Sega Dreamcast titles (it likely helped the Dreamcast was already compatible with Windows CE). While the final system did not keep this functionality, several Dreamcast-era sequels, like Jet Set Radio Future, were released exclusively for Xbox.
These comments may initially sound like the dying words of a flailing, failing console manufacturer, but Microsoft, at large, is a much greater beast than that. Now that Xbox has become the de facto largest third-party game publisher of all time, the focus is shifting toward selling as many games as possible rather than forcing players onto the Xbox platform.
As Phil Spencer says, "We want everybody to be able to play on Xbox and it does mean more of our games shipping on more platforms, not just PlayStation. We love the work that we do with Nintendo, we love what we do with Valve on Steam, and that's going to continue."
So, is Xbox going the same way as Sega? Absolutely not— Microsoft's big wallet has made sure of that. However, the next generation of Xbox consoles is going to need to offer a lot to bring people based on hardware versus the (likely) hybrid portable focus of "Switch 3" and the sure-to-be-yet-more-powerful PlayStation 6, which will both be sold based on their exclusive titles, as is tradition for the console business.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
But if Microsoft isn't careful with the idea that Xbox is not a hardware platform but rather a collection of games and services owned by Xbox, well, "When everybody's on Xbox, no one will be."
Christopher Harper has been a successful freelance tech writer specializing in PC hardware and gaming since 2015, and ghostwrote for various B2B clients in High School before that. Outside of work, Christopher is best known to friends and rivals as an active competitive player in various eSports (particularly fighting games and arena shooters) and a purveyor of music ranging from Jimi Hendrix to Killer Mike to the Sonic Adventure 2 soundtrack.
-
Heiro78 Can't say I'm surprised. It's a hell of a strategy. But they'll come out better than Sega. Remember when it was revealed that Microsoft wanted to buy Nintendo?Reply -
halfcharlie Anyone making their choice based on exclusives is foolish, most from both PS/XB end up on PC anyway, and actually take a look at how many true exclusives there are, not many. The vast vast majority of gaming is multi-platform titles which makes it a pointless distinction for most. Xbox has the better subscription which is the single best value gaming service out there, Xbox has the better controllers and always has, Xbox is cheaper and just as capable as the PS5, isn't ugly like the PS5, and Xbox has a much cheaper separate model to serve as a budget entry level console, which along with a Gamepass subscription is the best value in gaming period. I own both the XSX and PS5, the PS5 hasn't even been turned on in a year it's just collecting dust.Reply
Japan is of course full of PS fanboys so it always sells well there. But the PS5 outselling Xbox worldwide makes no sense at all considering all of the above, it's just not a better console in any way. Microsoft can't be blamed for the irrationality and unpredictability of consumers. It's not like Playstation hasn't been bringing most exclusives to PC and so going multi-platform either, this is a general trend not exclusive to Microsoft which benefits everyone and has nothing to do with their hardware. -
oofdragon PC + Nintendo gets you 99,99% of the games and everything in between from gaming on the go to ultra graphics and fps. Gaming on either PS5 or Xbox never made any sense to me, the later even more since I can't remember one interesting exclusive title in that console in decades.Reply -
Elusive Ruse
Gaming on Nintendo after I turned 10 didn’t make sense to me either but to each their own.oofdragon said:PC + Nintendo gets you 99,99% of the games and everything in between from gaming on the go to ultra graphics and fps. Gaming on either PS5 or Xbox never made any sense to me, the later even more since I can't remember one interesting exclusive title in that console in decades. -
NattyKing halfcharlie said:Anyone making their choice based on exclusives is foolish, most from both PS/XB end up on PC anyway, and actually take a look at how many true exclusives there are, not many. The vast vast majority of gaming is multi-platform titles which makes it a pointless distinction for most. Xbox has the better subscription which is the single best value gaming service out there, Xbox has the better controllers and always has, Xbox is cheaper and just as capable as the PS5, isn't ugly like the PS5, and Xbox has a much cheaper separate model to serve as a budget entry level console, which along with a Gamepass subscription is the best value in gaming period. I own both the XSX and PS5, the PS5 hasn't even been turned on in a year it's just collecting dust. Japan is of course full of PS fanboys so it always sells well there. But the PS5 outselling Xbox worldwide makes no sense at all considering all of the above, it's just not a better console in any way. Microsoft can't be blamed for the irrationality and unpredictability of consumers. It's not like Playstation hasn't been bringing most exclusives to PC and so going multi-platform either, this is a general trend not exclusive to Microsoft which benefits everyone and has nothing to do with their hardware.
This post reads like it was written by Aaron Greenberg. Why would anyone buy an Xbox now when they can look forward to playing Death Stranding 2, Wolverine, Marathon, Ghost of Yotei, etc and all the upcoming MGS games. Not to mention PS5 already has the superior third-party exclusives like Helldivers 2, Rise of the Ronin, Stellar Blade, and Final Fantasy 7 Rebirth.
Some will say GamePass, but that is only useful to people who like having their games selected for them and/or are on a tight budget - unless they're happy also buying a bunch of other games because most of the biggest games in the industry aren't on it. The service has also had a bunch of price hikes in recent years reducing its value, and you can be sure more will be coming soon. For most people it's better to simply buy your own games and play what you actually want, particularly if you have a backlog and can easily wait for new games to come down in price.
As for comparing the badly underpowered Series S to the Digital PS5 it's simply no contest. The former is the reason classics like Baldur's Gate 3 and Black Myth were delayed on Xbox, and the latter still isnt out thanks to to the Series S' measly 10GB RAM. Basically you're stuck with 30 fps low res games until the console gets phased out.
Then there's the Xbox controller which shows barely any improvements or new features from last gen. It still has a terrible d-pad, and feels cheap and lacking in quality compared to the DualSense.
Overall I can see you're still coping with this news, even though it's been clear Xbox was going third-party for a year now, but it's obvious why the market rejected Xbox.