SRC and Stanford Enable Chip Pattern Etching for 14nm

Stanford scientists were able to successfully demonstrate a new directed self-assembly (DSA) process not just for regular test patterns, but for irregular patterns that are required for the manufacture of smaller semiconductors. It was the first time that this next-generation process was used to contact hole patterns at 22 nm, but the scientists claim that the technique will enable pattern etching for next-generation chips down to 14 nm.

"This is the first time that the critical contact holes have been placed with DSA for standard cell libraries of VLSI chips. The result is a composed pattern of real circuits, not just test structures," said Philip Wong, the lead researcher at Stanford for the SRC-guided research. "This irregular solution for DSA also allows you to heal imperfections in the pattern and maintain higher resolution and finer features on the wafer than by any other viable alternative."

The research group also noted that the process is much more environmentally-friendly as a "healthier" solvent - polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate (PGMEA) - is used for the coating and etching process.

Leveraging the new DSA process, the researchers manufactured chips by covering a wafer surface with a block copolymer film and using "common" lithographic techniques to carve structures into the wafer surface and create a pattern of irregularly placed "indentations." These indentations are used to as templates "to guide movement of molecules of the block copolymer into self-assembled configurations." According to the researchers, these templates can be modified in their shape and size, which enables distance between holes to be reduced more than current techniques allow.

Create a new thread in the US News comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
16 comments
    Your comment
  • Anonymous
    Hmmm... what does IBM and Intel think? They are at the forefront of 14nm.
    6
  • IClassStriker
    I don't get it, they are making smaller and smaller chips even though they could improve on the current ones. I would be fine if they still make 32nm die, but add more cores and higher clock speeds. Most computers have sufficient cooling anyways.
    -15
  • IndignantSkeptic
    It's just amazing how many times scientists can keep Moore's law going. It helps make me think that Dr. Aubrey de Grey may be correct about the unbelievable future of biotechnology.
    7