Best offers
|
DELL Gaming Backpack Carrying Case... | $89.99 Dell Home More info |
|
Vostro A90 Netbook (1.6GHz Intel Atom... | $219.00 Dell Small Business Systems More info |
|
13.3" MacBook Pro Notebook (2.26GHz... | $1149.00 MacConnection More info |
|
VAIO VGN-NW270F/S Notebook (2.2GHz... | $649.98 STAPLES More info |
|
Inspiron Mini 10v Netbook (1.6GHz... | $279.00 Dell Home Systems More info |
Asus' G51J: Affordable Core i7 Mobile Gaming?
Mobility and gaming have been at odds for a long time, but Asus thinks its G51J could be the solution. With Intel Core i7 Mobile CPU technology and Nvidia’s recent GeForce GTX-260M, is this mid-sized, mid-priced notebook too good to be true at ~$1,500? Read More
-
ASI's IQ17-D2: Is Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2 Still Fast Enough?
After the launch of ATI's Cypress and Juniper parts, ATI's Mobility Radeon 3870 X2 is now three generations old. Is it still fast enough for gamers on the go? ASI sent us its IQ17-D2 with a mobile Core 2 Extreme and RAID 0 storage in order to find out. Read More
-
Mobile Core i7-920XM: Power Is The Price For Better Performance
Nehalem has finally gone mobile. But despite the advanced manufacturing that has gone into making Core i7 Mobile more efficient, it's still rated at up to 55W TDP and includes features like Hyper-Threading and Turbo Boost to keep it close to that limit. Read More
Partners
The Games selection
kids :
Bob
Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
|
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
Sponsored links
Old Laptops Are More Trouble Than They're Worth
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (59) |
- Share
That's right, you NEED a new laptop.
We all love shiny new computers, which is never more true than when it comes to laptops. Unlike with desktop machines, a laptop is a complete package that typically evolves as a whole.
With a laptop, you're not going to upgrade the display or keyboard, and you can forget about upgrading the internals. All those reasons aside, there's now research that suggests that keeping a laptop beyond three years is usually more trouble than its worth.
Companies still working with tightened belts may be pressured to stave off the replacement cycle, but that could end up costing more, according to tech analyst Jack Gold.
Computerworld reports that Gold has come up with a cost model that estimates the cost of maintaining a laptop for two years beyond the initial three is $960 – which may end up costing more than just purchasing a new one at the end of year three.
As the laptop ages, it is more prone to failures of worn items such as the hard drive, keyboard and battery. The relatively slower old machine may also not be as productive as a newer model, also costing the company some money.
So there you have it – yet another reason to have shiny new things more often!
Source : Tom's Hardware US
- Help MobilityGuru Redesign Psion's Iconic, Ultrasmall 5mx [Laptops & Notebooks]
- Don't know much about graphics card...help me [Graphic & Displays]
- Anyone interested in class action suit against HP [Laptops & Notebooks]
- Save XP! [Homebuilt Systems]
- Did I get a good deal on this laptop? [Laptops & Notebooks]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related articles
-
In the old days, when Windows 95 reigned supreme, processor power was the first item on a buyer's hardware specification list. With XP, the focus moved to sufficient RAM. Now with Vista I suggest that you start by making sure that your graphics card is able to deliver the Aero experience. Clearly, any specification is only as good as its weakest link, so you want a balanced system. Without hedging my bets too much, I'd say your most cost effective machine design depends on the software you are going to run on your machine. Gaming, home and business all have different hardware requirements, as do desktops, laptops and palmtops. From an environmental point of view, it is sad that so many of us are going to scrap old machines and buy new ones designed for Vista, displaying the Vista Premium Logo. On the other hand, this approach is safer and should be less frustrating, because you get a system that has been tested with Vista. If for some reason it doesn't work, someone else has to worry about assuring that everything works. You even have warranty protection. Whether you are buying new or upgrading, you should run through the requirements of each major component. Fortunately, the Windows Vista Upgrade Advisor will assist you; we'll discuss it shortly. Graphics Card The graphics card is the number one consideration with Vista. It shocked me to realize that the point has come that an average graphics card costs as much as an average CPU. Trust me: running Vista with an old graphics card is disappointing - you don't get the full Aero "Glass" experience, and some features plain don't work. The official MS Vista minimum is 128 MB for the graphics card, however do check the specification of the proposed card or your Vista install may only be effective at lower screen resolutions. My suggestion is to look for a graphics card with at least 256 MB of memory, supporting DirectX 9 graphics with a WDDM driver. It will almost certainly have Pixel Shader 2.0 and frame buffer memory of 32 bits per pixel. CPU Of course, there will always be a better faster CPU just around the corner. Fortunately, Vista will run with a 1 GHz processor. When buying new I never purchase the latest processor - I go for the next latest or the second most expensive. Any processor of over 2 GHz should be good enough for normal Vista tasks. Memory With each computer that I buy, I always spend what seems like an excessive amount of money on memory modules, but after a year, my purchase looks ordinary or even insufficient. The consensus is that Vista needs 1 GB of RAM, but Guy says go for 2 GB. Problems can arise if you decide to add more memory later; the company may tell you "we don't stock that type of SIMM any more"; or "our latest modules have a different arrangement of pins"; or perhaps, "the new stock is incompatible with your old RAM." Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate (Product... (5 offers) Online shop Price Royaldiscount.com $165.92 VioSoftware.com $198.96 SoftwareMedia.com $165.91 TigerDirect $252.96 Discount Mountain $185.00 See more products
-
Our tests have shown that the efficiency of a Pentium 75 Socket 5 system that is more than six years old can be greatly improved by means of selective tuning. Only an upgrade socket from Socket 5 to Socket 7 is necessary. We used an adapter from Powerleap . As a result, a processor bus clock restricted to 66 MHz offers a maximum achievable CPU clock rate of 400 MHz (66 MHz x 6 = 400 MHz). This clock increase is still quite substantial, especially when you consider that a Pentium 75 was used originally. The increase in frequency turns out to be more advantageous with some Socket 7 boards based on Intel's 430HX chipset. Some of these offer a processor bus clock of up to 83 MHz , to reach a processor core clock of up to 500 MHz. Still every user should think carefully about planning an upgrade. Unfortunately it is still impossible to tune one of those oldies as much that it would achieve the performance of today's computers. The actual purpose should be to optimize the old hardware so that it runs a modern operating system as e.g. Windows 98. The benchmark results demonstrate very clearly that our PC increased its performance tremendously with the AMD K6-2/400. The Sysmark2000 benchmark proved it. Similarly, with Quake III Arena we achieved almost twice the frame rate. Ultimately though, the optimized system is way behind the results of modern boards with a Socket 370 or Socket 462. The table below once again summarizes the costs for an upgrade. Note that we've also marked the mobile K6 versions with a "+". If you can't get hold of an K6-2/III 400 MHz anymore, you have to resort to an 450 or even 500 MHz version. Please don't forget that these models will still be limited to 400 MHz, because the old boards are not able to supply the required processor bus clock of 100 MHz. Upgrade Costs Est. Price Processor, AMD K6-2/400 $35 Processor, AMD K6-2+/500 * $75 Processor, AMD K6-III+/450 * $69 PowerLeap PL-ProMMX w/o CPU $50 PowerLeap PL-K6-III with 400 MHz CPU $199 32 MB EDO memory (60 ns, SIMM) $30 * limited to 6x66 MHz = 400 MHz Costs for the simple upgrade of an old Socket 5 system.
-
Processor Eurocom’s entry interested us for two reasons: to begin, it’s one of two Centrino 2 examples that have landed in our lab. Secondly, it features Intel’s Core 2 Extreme X9100 processor—the fastest mobile CPU (at least in terms of frequency) available. That chip, launched in July 2008, employs a 1,066 MHz front side bus and an 11.5x multiplier to hit a 3.06 GHz clock speed. Its two cores share a 6MB L2 cache, and of course, all of Intel’s power-saving technologies help conserve battery life—a good thing given the CPU’s somewhat-lofty 44 W TDP. Of course, that’s nothing compared to the 95 W imposed by the Q9650 in Killer Notebooks’ Odachi. Memory CPU-Z recognized the memory modules installed in Eurocom’s Montebello as DDR2. However, they’re actually DDR3-1333 modules capable of 10.6 GB/s. We’d hoped to see a 4 GB configuration from Eurocom, but our sample instead came with two sticks of 1 GB each. While we’ve seen plenty of conjecture as to the benefits of DDR3 in desktops, the technology is undoubtedly a boon to notebooks as a result of a reduction to supply voltage (DDR2 runs at 1.8 V, while our DDR3 modules only need 1.5 V). Although the timings on Eurocom’s OCZ DDR3 modules sound high at 9-9-9, bear in mind that the technology uses shorter clock cycles, so the latency would be similar to a DDR2 module running at 667 with CAS 4.5 timings. Even still, ASUS has the leg up here with its Qimonda modules running at 8-8-8. It goes without saying that we didn’t need to make any tweaks to the Montebello to get its 2 GB cruising under Vista x32. Graphics While Eurocom plans to make its Montebello available with Nvidia’s 9800M GTX, our model came with the 9800M GT—the same GPU found in Alienware’s m17x, only in a single-card setup rather than SLI. The M860TU is a much smaller notebook, so there’s no room for a second board. However, the 15.4” screen maxes out at 1680x1050 anyway. We’d expect that one 9800M GT might be able to deliver playable-enough frame rates. This is redundant information by now, but just as a reminder, the 9800M GT centers on the same G92M as last-generation’s mobile 8800-series GPUs. It’s manufactured at 65 nm, sports 754 million transistors, and is fed by 512 MB of GDDR3 memory on a 256-bit bus. The GPU clock runs at 500 MHz, the shaders cruise along at 1,250 MHz, and the memory is clocked at 799 MHz. Despite its identical GPUs, memory configurations, and model names, the 176.10 driver package used on Alienware’s m17x would not install here. We instead had to use the vendor-specific 176.02 driver supplied by Eurocom. Alas, that’s just one of the caveats when it comes to non-standard notebook hardware. We’ve come a long way, but hardware is not yet as standardized as desktop components. Storage The smaller, lighter M860TU Montebello doesn’t have room for multiple hard drives either. So, Eurocom installs a single Hitachi GST Travelstar 7K320 spinning at 7,200 RPM. In our own tests, we found the 7,200 RPM Travelstar to be an average performer. It’s not a stand-out, but it does complement the other performance components Eurocom chooses to install. There’s an available slot in the M860TU for a TurboMemory card, but the notebook is fine without it. The Intel feature works well enough in laptops without enough physical RAM, enabling Vista-specific capabilities like ReadyBoost and ReadyDrive. However, given the cost of memory, we’d prefer another 2 GB of DDR3. Networking Not only does the Montebello include Gigabit Ethernet, but it also sports Intel’s new WiFi Link 5300—an upgrade from the WiFI Link 4965AGN that preceded it. Like the 4965, the 5300 supports 802.11a/b/g/and draft-n. However, the newer model leverages three antennas to help it push up to 450 Mb/s. That’s up from a theoretical max of 300 Mb/s available on the 4965AGN. As mentioned in our Centrino 2 preview, the WiFi Link 5300 also incorporates some power-saving advancements and support for Active Management Technology 4.0. Chassis/LCD Clevo shows itself again, and this time it’s the M860TU chassis powering Eurocom’s Montebello bearing the same model number. The 15.4” chassis is actually available with four different LCD configurations. The lowest-end is a WXGA panel with a maximum resolution of 1280x800. Then there’s a WXGA+ option with a native 1440x900 resolution. Our sample included the third option, a WSXGA+ screen able to handle 1680x1050. But you can also get the same screen in WUXGA trim running at 1920x1200 natively. The front of the M860TU hosts a headphone output, digital S/PDIF output, microphone input, and mini FireWire 400 port. There are also a host of LEDs indicating battery status, wireless connectivity, hard drive activity, and the various key locks. The labeling is hard to read though, and the LEDs themselves are fairly dim, making them nearly useless as indicator lights. On the left side of the chassis you’ll find the optical drive—a DVD+/-R/RW dual-layer burner, which we found to open and close with a cheap snapping sensation. Most of the I/O is on the right side of the whitebook. Gigabit Ethernet, a 56k modem jack, two USB 2.0 ports, an ExpressCard bay, and a card reader are all there. Flip the notebook around for access to one more (poorly placed) USB 2.0 port, an equally hard-to-reach eSATA connector, DVI output, and an HDMI port.









or just buy a desktop
Only if you hire Geek Squad to fix it for you.
Sounds like another reason we need a better system for recycling electronics.
I've noticed this whole concept with cell phones, too. No matter how well you take care of them, after a few years not only has the technology completely leapfrogged the old models, your 2-3 year old phone is really getting kinda loose and squeaky. The more mobile it is, the more you have to factor in wear and tear! It's not like a desktop machine where you can really extend the life of the machine by changing its duties or making a simple upgrade.
That's why you have to love the technology industry. I have a conspiracy theory. These hardware companies probably have figured out how to make 10GHz 16 Core Laptops that last 20 hours on battery, etc. However, why jump that far ahead when you can release increments every year and charge a premium? It happened with the auto industry.
Who's paying for Gold's analysis? Laptop Manufacturers?
Pretty soon old Goldie will HAVE to tell us... that'll be nice.
I'm very hard on laptops, yet I've still got the one I bought in 2001... and it still runs. Until recently it was in 24/7 service for nearly 4 years without a hiccup (not as a laptop but as a cheap compact server).
I've had 6 laptops in the last 10 years... ONE has needed to be sent back for repair within the first 5 years of it's life. Certainly anecdotal but enough to make me question the validity of the research.
With a Thinkpad, 5 year is the norm.
That's why you have to love the technology industry. I have a conspiracy theory. These hardware companies probably have figured out how to make 10GHz 16 Core Laptops that last 20 hours on battery, etc. However, why jump that far ahead when you can release increments every year and charge a premium? It happened with the auto industry.
That would only hold true if only one laptop developer had figured out all that stuff. If more then one does there will be technology and price wars until all the tech is out on the shelves. Which leads up to the "competition is good" understanding. That is of course assuming there is no collaboration and price fixing between developers, which of course is illegal.
"Plus, the outdated notebooks will cost an organization $9,600 annually per person in lost end-user productivity, Gold said, since a machine that's two generations behind current models takes longer to boot up and runs sluggishly."
That's not a hardware problem. At best it is a perception problem and at worst it means your Windows mess is full of malware again and just needs a restore.
I agree with the warranty and hard drive failure claims but the rest depends on how well the user takes care of it.
I'd be interested in how they think this compares to Apple or any non-Windows OS.
or just buy a desktop
Yea, because dragging a desktop around for mobile troubleshooting is easy.
Sounds like planned obsolescence at work.
Any company that shells out that much to maintain a laptop simply has a poor business model. $960 by itself is way more than enough to pay for IT service, parts, upgrades, troubleshooting,...etc. In 2-3 years you're talking about a performance difference of corei7 vs core2duo. Thats not $960, unless companies are getting the extreme edition to stuff in laptops.
Well, my laptop is 6years old and it´s internal power supply (I may have the wrong name on this) just died 3 days ago, so 2 years is higly suspicious, the only time it needed something was another charger and that costed me 35euros,by the way my 1986 Data General Laptop is still working fine, just lost the Dos Diskett (damn). And no it does not run Crisis!!!!
That would only hold true if only one laptop developer had figured out all that stuff. If more then one does there will be technology and price wars until all the tech is out on the shelves. Which leads up to the "competition is good" understanding. That is of course assuming there is no collaboration and price fixing between developers, which of course is illegal.
It didn't stop the gas companies.
My 3 yr-old laptop hasn't costed me a penny to maintain aside from electricity.
What are you talking about!
oh not a slim Dell. those can be prone to overheating, how'd that one make it into the title? I like my personal dell fine enough but you'd have to pay me to buy a dell ever again after what i've seen in the office.
It didn't stop the gas companies.
Well, if laptops were a publicly traded commodity on wall street where dell, hp and acer could secretly funnel in money into speculation markets to affect the cost I would say this was a fair comparison.
Anyway, I think laptops are great if you need something portable. Most people I see put laptops on desks and only want to sit on the couch with it.
I also think there is a lesson to be learned from netbooks here. Ssd drives and lack of a cd drive make a computer a lot more reliable.
My 1 year Latitude has never failed me; also I have owned a Sony Vaio for almost 6 years and it's working flawlessly I only had to replace its hard drive and did a memory upgrade on it about 3 years ago, spent around $70, although it's a little slow for my current requirements.
I had to convince my employer over a year ago to upgrade the RAM from 512 to 1GB, I couldn't run any of my applications. I left that site, then came back recently, and I think I got the exact same laptop. It's now like 6 years old (running a 1.6GHz Pentium M, not even good in 2003). Needless to say, I have to wait 5 minutes every morning just for the apps that are already up and running to start responding (and no, I don't even suspend my computer).
And stupid tech depts don't allow you to do registry optimization or defrags. My piece of junk at work takes 5 minutes to start up. If I didn't secretly open up my case at night to upgrade the ram, it'd be even worse. My career goal is to be CEO not because of the wealth or power it brings - but to order the tech dept. to shut the hell up when I'm bypassing their draconian email rules and network filters.
My first thinkpad lasted for 7 years before I replaced it, and that was mainly due to the hassles of trying to get a wireless card working with win2k.
I got it in 2001 and last I heard it was still working fine one of my relatives who uses it to take notes in class & play music.
My 2nd thinkpad (purchased last year) works great and actually plays some games better than my desktop.
But neither of them were "cheap" .. I paid $2k for them new and I got what I paid for.
When you skimp on the pricetag, normally you endup skimping on quality which will come back & bite you in the a$$
You have to think of this as a fleet of laptops. Sure one may last 10 years but how many out of the fleet of 10 to 1000s have problems. The average business laptop is normally covered for 3 years after that the parts are the owners problem.
For personal use I have the same T40 with 2GB of ram and it works fine. The fan is failing but that's a 60.00 cost to replace vs. 300 for a new laptop that may in fact fail during the same time I kept the T40.
Here is a nice video about consumption.
http://www.storyofstuff.com/
Hmm... sounds interesting to me. "This analysis company says that you should stimulate the economy rather than attempt to stretch your dollar because it -might- end up costing you more."
Here we have a failure in simple logic that's practiced all over the place. Spend X amount of dollars to prevent having to possibly spend Y. Insurance, extended warranties, service plans are one way... advanced unnecessary replacement of products are another. You're gambling. It's a game of chance. You can analyze statistically, but statistics are NEVER indicitave of an individual result. Just because the 'average person' has to spend $960 to maintain a laptop for 3 years, does not apply to me. I have had to spend $0 to 'maintain' my laptop for 3 years. Guess what? Under those statistics, I just MADE $960... where's my check? It's absurd.
Remember, 73% of statistics are made up on the spot and four out of five dentists think the fifth is a jerk and should just get with the ****'ing program. This is data... and useless data at that. I think the money spent to come up with this statistic should be spent to feed starving children... or... you know... by laptops for them... or something.
well by the logic of this article my laptop is soon be more trouble than its worth. although in my opinions i cant possibly see how my laptop is going to cost me anything other than the cost of powering it and a OS upgrade to Win7.
@njkid3 - And you can get a Win7 upgrade for 29.99 from http://tinyurl.com/yaphg92
I have an ancient Gateway 1.5Ghz PentiumM with 256MB of RAM I was considering throwing out since even XP with SP3 drags it down to being unusable. Anyway I installed Slitaz Linux on it and loved it. Now the server is down and I switched to Crunchbang, not quite as snappy but its pretty sweet to have a nice laptop again
Its too bad that in the corporate world hardware cannot be recycled this way, I can only imagine the $$$ saved.
"So there you have it – yet another reason to have shiny new things more often!" ^_^
Oh yeah, gotta buy a new one.
My Dell Inspiron at 5+ years still works great and still gets nearly 3 hours on the original battery. But I needed to run more apps on it now and they need more power, so I had to buy a new workstation-class laptop to supplement it. I still use the old one when it can do the job.
For business use it's easy to see how an old machine could cost a company money for various reasons. I've decided to replace my desktop workstations every 2 years, but our CAD and engineering apps need all the power we can get and more.
... Hmmmmmm... Hmmmm... The study seems suspicious. Was the $960 average form the 1 stolen notebook out of 1000 with "value data" costing the company $960,000... If only that had the new lo-jacked, super-duper encrypted notebook.
That being said, one good reason for businesses to just purchase a new notebook after the 3 year warranty period is that about half of the cost of the notebook will have been amortized and the remaining half can mostly be recovered by selling the notebook (i.e. net cost is close to zero). And, obviously, out of warranty repair cost will be close to nil.
this doesn't sound like an analysis valid for a geeky home user, yet it will be very valid for the average user and even more so for companies that have to spend ridiculous amounts of money for warrantied tech support
I still keep my old Toshiba Satellite I bought about 4 or 5 years ago... runs like a champ, I've added 1 gig of RAM and I'm about to replace the DVD unit... then again, I'm not representative of your average laptop owner... let alone of an employee who has a company laptop
Probably that 2-3 year life cycle is geared towards the consumer grade laptops, especially the newer ones. I found this to be very common on Dell laptops. At least Dell laptops are so common you can easily locate cheap, used, or even new parts for them.
Many people tend to buy a laptop and sit it on a desk or table most of the time which isn't as hard on them. Actually using a laptop on your lap can wear things out pretty quickly from fraying inside the wiring of the AC adapter to loose/squeaky hinges.
My last laptop was a Dell Inspiron 6400. The battery died within the first year due to heat issues and easily clogged vent. After the first year you had to tighten the hinges once in awhile. Eventually ended up having to pick up new hinges with an LCD assembly after one of the hinges decoupled from the LCD panel. Went through a keyboard almost every year, when the keys weren't popping off I was wearing indentations into the keys. (and no I don't pound on the keyboard)
Then there is the ever famous Dell AC adapters. If my laptop wasn't rejecting it as a genuine adapter, it was beeping, buzzing etc and needing replacement.
Then there are those painted on finishes. Nothing like having a laptop for 2-3+ years and it looking like utter crap because the silver finish is wearing off on the touchpad and all the plastics surrounding it.