Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Eight Computing Advancements At IBM Research

Eight Computing Advancements At IBM Research
By
Introduction

Although the company hasn’t used the “think” marketing term in its television ads for years, IBM is definitely one of the smartest tech companies around. In many ways, IBM transitioned from bring a PC manufacturer to a think tank that creates ideas—and charges the analyst fees you would expect if you want to hear about those ideas. Yet, in the IBM Research arm, there are lofty goals: to create the next kind of storage technology; one that is much faster yet less harmful on the environment, or to invent ways to read data from physical objects, such as a bridge or a waterway, that have not been known for being highly connected.

Each of these research projects is particularly interesting from a PC computing perspective because they will likely make their way into your home or place of work in the next ten years. In some cases, the research has already made an impact. Each project solves a puzzling computing problem, and will help usher in an age of more ubiquitous computing.

See more See less
Display 20 Comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 1 Hide
    cyberkuberiah , November 27, 2009 5:48 AM
    yeah , ibm has one of the largest patent portfolio .
  • 0 Hide
    neiroatopelcc , November 27, 2009 6:02 AM
    I wonder if mote runner could solve the problem siemens has with its cts systems! (ie they don't work anywhere near as good as they do in theory, because they employ a million different sensors and need different staffing depending on the hardware - and at siemens there's no such word as teamwork)
  • 0 Hide
    nonxcarbonx , November 27, 2009 6:21 AM
    no supercomputing elements?
  • 1 Hide
    donaldduck , November 27, 2009 6:51 AM
    And they still cannot make a decent email client :p 
  • -3 Hide
    powerbaselx , November 27, 2009 7:07 AM
    Also it's a pitty IBM couldn't convince Apple to keep PowerPC laptops (even moving to Intel Macbooks at the sametime), and also for not bring back a new version of OS/2 operating system in the same line of MacOS.
    For the ones that remember the old OS/2 Warp it was a great operating system very stable with excelent multitasking capabilities.
  • 4 Hide
    void_pointer , November 27, 2009 7:58 AM
    Quote:
    [Page 1] In many ways, IBM transitioned from bring a mere PC manufacturer to a think tank that creates ideas [sic]


    IBM? A mere PC manufacturer? OMG! That is mind-shatteringly terrible -- 30 seconds of research would have told you that your understanding of IBM's history is hopelessly and ineptly inaccurate!

    Poor.
    Seriously poor.
  • -3 Hide
    neiroatopelcc , November 27, 2009 8:23 AM
    powerbaselxAlso it's a pitty IBM couldn't convince Apple to keep PowerPC laptops (even moving to Intel Macbooks at the sametime), and also for not bring back a new version of OS/2 operating system in the same line of MacOS.For the ones that remember the old OS/2 Warp it was a great operating system very stable with excelent multitasking capabilities.

    was it? I remember we bought it simply because it was cheaper to buy the os and format the floppies than buy floppies individually!
  • -2 Hide
    Anonymous , November 27, 2009 12:33 PM
    IBM acronym I Blame Microsoft ;) 
  • 4 Hide
    njalterio , November 27, 2009 1:45 PM
    Quote:
    In many ways, IBM transitioned from bring a mere PC manufacturer...


    Nope. Not reading any further!
  • -3 Hide
    Anonymous , November 27, 2009 4:02 PM
    The move to multi-core is not driven by lithographic limitations but instead by device leakage/Power/thermal envelope putting a limitation on maximum clock frequency. Jobs can only be executed faster now if they can be distributed over many cores. Lithography is enabling multi-cores: 2 cores per chip 2 years ago, now 6 and soon 8 cores per chip.
  • -3 Hide
    avg-joe , November 28, 2009 3:43 PM
    wicked_vinny wrote: IBM acronym I Blame Microsoft ;) 

    Nah. IBM these days stands for "India-Based Manpower".
  • -3 Hide
    Anonymous , November 28, 2009 4:25 PM
    One Mainframe To Rule Them All-IBM and Verichip- The Human Microchipping Agenda

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mF1h_FaQOq4&feature=player_embedded#
  • -1 Hide
    AtuBrian , November 28, 2009 4:37 PM
    interesting
  • -1 Hide
    bayouboy , November 28, 2009 6:13 PM
    checkitoutnowOne Mainframe To Rule Them All-IBM and Verichip- The Human Microchipping Agendahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mF1 [...] _embedded#

    LOL, conspiracy theories. Be careful IBM knows where you live, and even your dreams. Tin foil helps.
  • 0 Hide
    skine , November 28, 2009 8:37 PM
    Dear IBM,

    Please come back home.

    -Person living in Binghamton.
  • 0 Hide
    back_by_demand , November 28, 2009 9:26 PM
    I think IBM have the right attitude, this isnt a list of consumer products, not yet anyway.
    Billions are being spent on research where the ultimate aim is... discovery!!!
    Some of these ideas may have serious commercial applications, some may not, but all of them are amazing. Working in IBM's R&D division must be like "Eureka" but without all the sci-fi adventures.
    All this is paid for with boring corporate ebusiness stuff, etc, etc.

    I can imagine it like a stuffy accountancy company ploughing it's profits into going snowboarding at weekends
  • 1 Hide
    kelfen , November 29, 2009 2:11 AM
    The vampire that never dies! IBM!
  • -2 Hide
    mlopinto2k1 , November 29, 2009 7:02 AM
    IBM - Internatioal Business Machines.. *cough*

    http://professionalmike.com
  • -1 Hide
    mlopinto2k1 , November 29, 2009 2:37 PM
    powerbaselxAlso it's a pitty IBM couldn't convince Apple to keep PowerPC laptops (even moving to Intel Macbooks at the sametime), and also for not bring back a new version of OS/2 operating system in the same line of MacOS.For the ones that remember the old OS/2 Warp it was a great operating system very stable with excelent multitasking capabilities.
    My friend works for IBM in Fishkill and HATES WARP.
  • 0 Hide
    chris62 , November 30, 2009 12:13 PM
    http://www.ddj.com/architect/212900103

    Until a few years ago, the processor hardware community translated Moore's Law of transistor density directly into single-threaded performance gains as a result of increasing clock frequencies. Lately, this translation has been hampered by the effects of clock frequency on power consumption and heat generation. The new reality is that per-thread performance is essentially static, and an increase in performance is delivered by an increase in the number of available processor cores per socket.