Best offers
|
GeForce GTX 295 Video Card (1.75GB,... | $549.99 Dell Home More info |
|
GeForce GTX 285 Video Card (1GB,... | $279.99 Best Buy More info |
|
GeForce 9800 GTX Video Card (512MB,... | $230.00 ServerSupply.com More info |
|
GeForce GTX 260 Video Card (896MB,... | $229.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Radeon HD 4870 X2 Video Card (2GB,... | $449.99 Dell Home More info |
- radeon 4830
- 9800 gt benchmarks
- 8800 gt vs 9800 gt
- radeon 4830 crossfire with what
- radeon hd 4830 crossfire
- p45 motherboard comparison
- radeon 4830 benchmark
- hd 4830 crossfire
- 9800 gt power usage
- nvidia geforce 8800 gt to hdmi
- vga cooler for 9800 gt
- 4830 vs
- nvidia geforce 9800 gt benchmark
- nvidia geforce 8800 gts high pitch
- nvidia 9800 gt vs hd 4830
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
kids :
Bob
Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
|
Sponsored links
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (98) |
- Share
We have gathered quite a bit of information about the Radeon HD 4830. First of all, let’s discuss whether it’s a worthy successor to the legendary GeForce 8800/9800 GT. In the following graph, we left out SLI and CrossFire performance to prevent an arguable PCIe lane inequity from becoming a point of contention. Here is a pure single-card, 4830 vs. 8800 GT comparison:

The benchmarks show a very close race between the Radeon HD 4830 and the GeForce 8800/9800 GT, making it very difficult to claim a clear win based on 3D performance alone. The Radeon HD 4830 did tend to perform a little better than the 8800 GT, and we shouldn’t forget that our test 8800 GT card was overclocked 100 MHz from the factory. However, the margins of victory are too small to easily dismiss the 8800/9800 GT as a bad buy compared to the new 4830.
When we look at the big picture, the 4830 begins to shine a little brighter. Notable features make the card more favorable, like true 7. 1 HD audio over the HDMI output, exceptional overclocking potential, and the ability to construct a cheap, yet powerful, CrossFire setup using a cost-effective P45 motherboard. When these features are combined with the 4830’s capable gaming prowess, it becomes an easier card to recommend.
Having said that, the GeForce 8800 GT and GeForce 9800 GT are no slouches and still offer good performance for the buck, especially for folks who already own an SLI-capable motherboard. This is a close race where everybody wins, especially the consumer.
Finally, let’s consider some of specific 4830 offerings individually. PowerColor’s 4830 affords high overclocking potential in conjunction with Tray Tools and it has the convenience of wielding DVI, HDMI, and VGA outputs without the need for an adapter. The card also has an excellent, quiet GPU cooler.
On the other hand, Sapphire’s 4830 offers good overclockability, a myriad of display options (including DVI, VGA, HDMI, S-video, and component video) , and low heat/power usage when in 2D mode due to an aggressive underclock.
Both the PowerColor 4830 and Sapphire 4830 offer slightly different packages for people with different needs, but either one is an easy recommendation. Our only real complaint about the pair is a lack of a CrossFire cable with the cards--on a board that supports the feature, these should really be part of the package.
Not only has the Radeon HD 4830 proven itself an excellent choice in its price bracket, but the options delivered to the public by both Sapphire and PowerColor are quite attractive. The 8800 GT lives on in the 9800 GT, but the days of unchallenged dominance over the game enthusiast mainstream are at an end.
- 1 / 5
- Next
-
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Tyring to build a PC need an advice
- Real Power 450W
- Average gaming system recommendations
- First build advice
- Looking to build a new system for gaming...(around $500)
- Building new system Need help Under 600$
- System died...Need help with new one FAST...Help Please!!!
- SLI / CrossFire FAQs
- CrossFireX Bridge Interconnect cables?
- Samsung or BenQ
- GDDR2, 3, 4, and 5?
- Need Help Deciding on Crossfire GPU






Great look into the 4830. Makes me want to buy a Xfire setup using these.
If you couldn't get Tray Tools to work with the Sapphire card why not use another program? Instead of giving up and coming up with a lame conclusion.
Also 993*2 doesn't equal 1885 and the 4870 is clocked at 750 not 780.
Your sound and temp charts have FPS on their X axis.
It's nice to see good cards from both companies, ATI and NVidia!
And the price is not bad at all. The competition is so good!
The chart on page two sais 4850 runs at 625 - but stock is 600, and 4870 at 780 - which is 750 stock ... so is the 4830 speed correct?
Numbers and charts are corrected.
Actually stock clocks on the 4850 *are* 625.
I'm sure i saw that "4850 - smarter by design" article at anandtech first. or somewhere else... the name anyway not necessarily the article >.>
I knew that the 8800GT wasn't that fast, but those benchmarks ahve to be wrong... Sorry Nvidia fan boy here. Bye.
Um actually, the MSI runs at x16/x8 in SLI mode. If you instead got an evga 750i FTW motherboard, you would find it runs at x16/x16 in sli, thanks to its unlocked NF200 chip. the 750i FTW is not a reference nvidia board as the MSI is.
LOL at 1680x1050, the 4870X2 IMPROVES when 4xAA is added? i smell a rat...
Which test are you talking about, Venom? is added? i smell a rat...[/citation]
Far cry 2
Far cry 2
In Far Cry 2 there is a .8 frame difference, and shifting to 1920x1200 costs 2.1 frames at 4xAA. This is a processor bottleneck. In other words, performance is similar with and without anti-aliasing applied because the graphics card is nowhere near taxed at that resolution or the one above it.
Nice article ATI has really been on the move in all price ranges in creating compitition I would think the next gen cards are going to be a die strink if you look at how they got 4xxx. 3xxx die shrink and 4xxx beef up in power for competitive cards/price.
Actually stock clocks on the 4850 *are* 625.
Oh my bad. I mixed up the numbers with some on g92 chips (just bought 28 9600gt's yesterday)
Anyhow - the 4870 is 750, not 780 - at least they were when I bought mine.
ps.
"On a side note, we will mention that GRID is one of those games that really does require AA for the best visuals. Happily, the game engine seems very easy on the video cards and even the single-card configurations were able to provide 4xAA with playable frame rates."
I want to add that this is only true for current generation cards. My dad's p4 with a 7600gs can only run it with grahpics at very low @ 800x600 - though he runs suppreme commander just fine at 1024 ...
Oh my bad. I mixed up the numbers with some on g92 chips (just bought 28 9600gt's yesterday)Anyhow - the 4870 is 750, not 780 - at least they were when I bought mine.
Yup, you're right--the chart was originally incorrect, but I went back and corrected that spec, along with the memory frequency mentioned by Doltron.
Curious to hear how your dad's system runs SC no sweat at 1024. This is one of those ones that consistently drops test platforms to their knees. He actually gets playable frame rates on a P4?
yes he does. Mind you it's not with aa on or anything set at max res. But he plays it just fine. He doesn't have the expansion though - doesn't play it all that much. Dunno if the expansion makes any difference.
His rig (2.4 northwood, 2gb pc3200, 7600gs on a cantherwood chipset) plays test drive, age of empires 3 and supreme commander at playable levels, but doesn't do grid playable. I suppose he'd have a chance at grid if we'd oc the cpu, but last time we ran 3,2 I ended up breaking their c:\windows\system32\config\system file ... and he didn't like that.
Would have loved to see this with the new Cat 8.12's, as theyre getting much better performance than the 8.10's.
The
Would have loved to see this with the new Cat 8.12's, as theyre getting much better performance than the 8.10's.
Yeah, unfortunately the 8.12s just came out and this article has been a long time in the making.
If you couldn't get Tray Tools to work with the Sapphire card why not use another program? Instead of giving up and coming up with a lame conclusion.
Mostly because the card didn't seem to be able to get past 690 MHz core without problems in the Catalyst Control Center, so there didn't seem to be much point in persuing overclocking much further.
But for the sake of completeness I can give Rivatuner a shot this evening and see if anything changes. I'll let you know.