- 6 Graphics Cards with Luxury Trimmings
- Workstation-Shootout: ATi FireGL V7600 vs. Nvidia Quadro FX 4600
- The Best Gaming Graphics Cards for the Money: November 2007
- New Nvidia GeForce 8800GT Surprises
- New ATI HD 3800 To Support DX 10.1
- AVIVO HD vs. Purevideo HD Part 3: Midrange and Low-end Card...
- DirectX 10 Shootout: Nvidia vs. ATI
- The Best Gaming Graphics Cards For The Money: October 2007
- Integrated Graphics for Gaming or HTPC?
- ATI's Radeon 2600 XT Remixed
- CPU Buyers' Guide (updated 10 May 2008)
- Abnormally high CPU temp. Any ideas why?
- As always ....will I have enough power?
- URRRG need help!!!!
- What cpu for a budget desktop for my parents?
- Suggested hardware for overclocking AMD Athlon 64 X2
- 3000+ @ 65C, help for new hsf plz!
- DDR memory question. 2gigs single channel verses 1gig dual
- Socket 939 vs AM2
- Athlon XP3200+ to AMD64 2800+ - Worth it?
Crysis
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: amd, radeon, hd, 3800
Syndication:
Crysis


Crysis is again subject to special treatment; on one hand it's the only one on which we have to lower resolutions and graphical settings one step (and despite all that, the averages noted are the lowest among all the games) and on the other hand it requires us to use a special driver for NVIDIA (169.05) in order to erase a curious SLI bug favoring standalone GeForces and on which the manufacturer communicates as little as possible. It's regrettable!
Despite all this, the situation doesn't really change at top of the chart, with performances behind by 16% for the HD 3870 compared to the 8800 GT, filters disabled, and around 21% once antialiasing is activated, except in 1920 x 1440. The HD 3850 is only behind the 8800 GTS 320 MB by no more than 4 to 6% on the two lowest resolutions, and the gap doesn't go beyond 15% in 1920 x 1440, a mode that's completely unplayable on those two cards anyway. Thumbs up for the HD 3850 in this case!
- Previous page Unreal Tournament 3
- Next page Call Of Duty 4