Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Benchmark Results: PCMark Vantage

Three 2.5" SAS Drives: Enterprise Data Giants, Compared
By , Achim Roos

Strictly speaking, PCMark Vantage benchmark is not intended to measure the performance of enterprise hard drives. Nevertheless, we included it for the sake of completion.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display 2 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 2 Hide
    compton , June 17, 2011 4:17 AM
    Toms with some more review niceness. Thanks for another interesting article. I don't think mechanical storage is going anywhere soon. For better and worse we'll still have it around for a long, long time to come. Even when SSDs hit that magical speed/capacity/cost point to be ubiquitous for mainstream consumers, enterprises will still need HDDs as part of their storage needs. HDDs are at least a known quantity that are still getting better.
  • 0 Hide
    bit_user , June 19, 2011 7:45 AM
    3rd paragraph: "have to be taken into considered". You also didn't mention capacity and cost/GB, where mechanical disks still reign supreme.

    Also, why not benchmark a 3.5" disk, but only use the outer portion. If both that and a 2.5" have the same density and rotational velocity, then the 3.5" should win due to higher I/O speeds resulting from higher linear velocity.