Best offers
|
GeForce GTX 295 Video Card (1.75GB,... | $549.99 Dell Home More info |
|
GeForce GTX 260 Video Card (896MB,... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GeForce 9800 GTX Video Card (512MB,... | $230.00 ServerSupply.com More info |
|
GeForce GTX 285 Video Card (1GB,... | $279.99 Best Buy More info |
|
GeForce GTX 260 Video Card (896MB,... | $229.99 STAPLES More info |
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
Interactive Boogy
Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
|
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
Sponsored links
- Email |
- Print |
- Comment (1) |
- Share
3DMark05
As usual I tested 3DMark05 at all resolutions with antialiasing and anisotropic filtering disabled during the primary run. On the second round I went for improved image quality turning on both 4xAA and 8xAF.
It is clear from the comparative charts that AMD (formerly ATI) has a Vista driver that maintains the same performance level as that of its Windows XP counterpart. Microsoft stated that it would not be uncommon that graphics performance under Vista would come in 5%-10% behind that running on Windows XP. Nvidia hits that target with image quality enhancements disabled but when antialiasing and anisotropic filtering are enabled it is a different story. I retested the Nvidia GeForce 7900GTX under Vista again to verify that indeed there was a 50% reduction in performance at 2048x1536 with 4xAA and 8xAF. At both 1600x1200 and 2560x1600 the performance reduction was 37%
- BIOSHOCK AND DIRECTX10 HACK NO WORK=[ [Games General]
- More dx10 benches from Anandtech [Graphic & Displays]
- Second Take: Fixing Game Reviews [Bestofmedia's Site Feedback]
- HELP! 3dmark dropped thousands in vista vs xp [Graphic & Displays]
- What do people have against Crysis? [Graphic & Displays]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!