Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Benchmark Results: Gaming And Multimedia

Three Sub-$500 AMD Brazos-Based Notebooks Rounded Up
By

Anything less than the E-350 yields unsatisfactory performance. The single-core E-240 actually turns out to be the worst performer, despite having a faster clock speed than the C-50.

Even at lower resolutions, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is essentially unplayable. We benchmarked using medium settings, but this didn't result in scores greater than 20 FPS for HP's dm1z. Performance on the NV51B08u and the C655D is so poor that, no matter how low you set the quality, you duck in under 10 FPS.

Left 4 Dead 2 offers some relief for the under-powered 15.6" NV51B08u and C655D. When we dial everything down to 1024x768 using Medium quality settings, the dm1z and NV51B08u start to perform better, though the C655D scores pitifully when compared to the NV51B08u. Again, it's better to have a C-50 than an E-240.

We were unable to benchmark on anything higher than the Fair setting in World of Warcraft because the game requires a dual-core processor for higher presets. But if you use a netbook like the dm1z, you'll have few complaints. The quality isn't stunning, but lower settings are suitable for smaller screens, such as HP's dm1z.

On a 15.6" notebook, higher-detail settings make more sense, but they're unavailable to the single-core Zacate- and Ontario-powered notebooks like the C655D. However, even at lower settings, the E-240 turns out frame rates below 20 FPS. This is still about 30% less than the performance you'll get out of the E-350, which tells you something about how CPU-limited this game can be. Turning up the quality on Gateway's NV51B08u drastically lowers performance. Anything above 1024x768 and Fair quality is almost out of the question for those who want performance around 30 FPS.

Display all 71 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 3 Hide
    tacoslave , April 8, 2011 4:20 AM
    they should have put a larger battery on these!
  • 0 Hide
    matthewspencershell , April 8, 2011 4:43 AM
    I got my acer E-350 for $399 w/ 3gb ram, and 320G hd from hhgreg
  • 1 Hide
    one-shot , April 8, 2011 4:46 AM
    I ordered a Lenovo X120e E350 4GB RAM Win 7 Pro for $529. Lenovo's build quality and matte screen made the deal for me. Personally, I think the DM1Z is hideous.
  • 0 Hide
    hp79 , April 8, 2011 5:55 AM
    Yeah, I also had a lenovo x120e. Build quality is excellent on those. I wasn't impressed with the performance too much though. It's was little bit slower than my thinkpad x61t core2duo L7500 which was from 4 years ago. But video playback was really smooth. It played 1080p mkv videos with only 30% cpu usage.

    Since I got my x120e with e-350 for $305, I eventually sold mine for a small profit.

    ---unrelated to the article---
    Toms, please fix the navigation menu!!!
    Everyone that is annoyed at the navigation menu, please vote this suggestion.

    http://feedbacks.tomshardware.com/forums/14581-site-forum-ideas/suggestions/1297969-page-navigation-really-sucks?ref=title
  • 2 Hide
    bobdozer , April 8, 2011 8:32 AM
    The D525 can only go toe-to-toe with the 3-350 if you only look at the results of multi-threaded benchmarks.

    Use the D525 then use the E-350 and you will not go back to the D525 and it will be obvious why.
  • 3 Hide
    juliom , April 8, 2011 10:16 AM
    Impressive how much bias Tom's has these days... E-350 performs quite a bit better than Atom in pure CPU power and don't even get me started on the GPU performance. All in just ONE chip! As much as it hurts you Tom's, Brazos is a much, much better platform than Atom is.
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , April 8, 2011 10:17 AM
    Strange how the first picture(from AMD) in the conclusion puts i7 higher than BULLDOZER!
  • 1 Hide
    Anonymous , April 8, 2011 10:22 AM
    They wont put a large battery nor will they price it lower.Know why ,bcos the blue monster has found a new and novel way to continue its monopoly.
  • 0 Hide
    acku , April 8, 2011 11:01 AM
    Quote:
    Impressive how much bias Tom's has these days... E-350 performs quite a bit better than Atom in pure CPU power and don't even get me started on the GPU performance. All in just ONE chip! As much as it hurts you Tom's, Brazos is a much, much better platform than Atom is.


    Quote:
    The D525 can only go toe-to-toe with the 3-350 if you only look at the results of multi-threaded benchmarks.

    Use the D525 then use the E-350 and you will not go back to the D525 and it will be obvious why.


    I'll admit that is a bit of stinging indictment. :)  Can't we play nice? But I understand the sentiment. I really was after the point that the E-350 isn't all that different from the D525/Ion2 combo. It is better in graphics but in terms of CPU it is probably the closest to SU3700. And to be fair, many applications and tasks we preform on a daily basis continue to be multi-threaded.

    I completely agree that Brazos is much better than Atom, but I don't think it's one of those automatic game changers, unless you're talking about a netbook. Now if AMD wants to completely and utterly destroy Intel in the the low-end market, I say drop the price another $50 bucks. Price per performance is where AMD historically has had an advantage. Remember X2? But right now, the company is benefiting from Intel having not released a successor to Pine Trail. For the netbook market, Brazos is great, but that isn't what is going to help AMD dominate the market. The lack of products in the mainstream mobile space is why AMD fired Dirk Meyer.

    On a side note, I'm a hardware agnostic. That's the way it should always be. I believe in competition and Brazos is delivering it. I just want AMD to bring a bigger fight to the table. They talked so much about Fusion, it's time to deliver. At the moment, I tend to cringe every time Gartner or IDC talks to me about market share.

    I think part of the disappointment is that AMD promised me an epic gunfight and I'm watching two people duke it out with peashooters. Ooo so Ion2 does 9 fps Brazos does 12 fps.
  • 2 Hide
    juliom , April 8, 2011 11:04 AM
    Yes, I also think that Brazos belongs to notebooks and not normal laptops.
  • 0 Hide
    pelov , April 8, 2011 11:11 AM
    juliomYes, I also think that Brazos belongs to notebooks and not normal laptops.


    It does. My understanding is that brazos is their attempt at making at an APU that can compete with the atom in the netbook or low-powered-notebook market. The future llano APUs will be desktop/laptop APUs and bulldozers are server/high end desktop CPUs.

    Good writeup. I was leaning towards the ASUS e-350 but it didn't make it into the test :( 
  • 0 Hide
    acku , April 8, 2011 11:16 AM
    Quote:
    It does. My understanding is that brazos is their attempt at making at an APU that can compete with the atom in the netbook or low-powered-notebook market. The future llano APUs will be desktop/laptop APUs and bulldozers are server/high end desktop CPUs.

    Good writeup. I was leaning towards the ASUS e-350 but it didn't make it into the test :( 


    So everyone is in agreement? Brazos does better in a netbook. To clarify, AMD's management was a bit too ambitious. It envisioned this as a revolution in computing for thin and light notebooks, budget notebooks, and All-in-One desktops. That's how they initially positioned the product. The fact that we have a 15.6" C-50 system is an example of how crazy it's gotten. That's the agenda they're pushing. I just feel that is a bit too optimistic. Almost every week, Best Buy has a doorbuster 15.6" Phenom that's priced the same as the larger Brazos systems.
  • 0 Hide
    acku , April 8, 2011 11:18 AM
    Quote:
    It does. My understanding is that brazos is their attempt at making at an APU that can compete with the atom in the netbook or low-powered-notebook market. The future llano APUs will be desktop/laptop APUs and bulldozers are server/high end desktop CPUs.

    Good writeup. I was leaning towards the ASUS e-350 but it didn't make it into the test :( 


    OOO... You mean the 1215B? I would recommend that one over the dm1z. I just didn't have the time to put it through the paces.
  • 0 Hide
    lradunovic77 , April 8, 2011 12:37 PM
    These CPU as far as Gaming goes completely useless cause it is unplayable. Only good side is low power usage otherwise Intel ATOM and AMD solution -> not sure why even make it.
  • 1 Hide
    silverblue , April 8, 2011 12:52 PM
    AMD didn't really position Brazos as a low-cost gaming platform. Therefore, I shouldn't be too surprised when it doesn't compete well in newer titles. Older titles should be its natural stomping ground.

    Essentially, I see Brazos more as a general productivity platform with good HD video capability and the ability to play older gaming titles at 720p. If it fulfils this role, then it's serving its purpose, but it should never do so for more than $500.
  • -1 Hide
    acku , April 8, 2011 1:01 PM
    Quote:
    AMD didn't really position Brazos as a low-cost gaming platform. Therefore, I shouldn't be too surprised when it doesn't compete well in newer titles. Older titles should be its natural stomping ground.

    Essentially, I see Brazos more as a general productivity platform with good HD video capability and the ability to play older gaming titles at 720p. If it fulfils this role, then it's serving its purpose, but it should never do so for more than $500.


    Tell that to AMD. The marketing folks cite Wow and Flash/1080p video as what the Brazos should do on a day to day basis. Had they been realistic, I wouldn't be so pessimistic. The fact that there is a 15.6" E-240 proves my point. That's just nuts.
  • 0 Hide
    burnley14 , April 8, 2011 1:10 PM
    Awfully disappointing results. I was really hoping these chips would usher in an age where all new CPU/GPU/APU systems could handle multitasking well and at least make games playable. Not so I guess.
  • 0 Hide
    pelov , April 8, 2011 1:23 PM
    ackuOOO... You mean the 1215B? I would recommend that one over the dm1z. I just didn't have the time to put it through the paces.


    Yep! looks great. $450 on newegg so it's a bit steep but looks fantastic. I am probably picking it up within the next month or so just to see what other companies have to offer.

    burnley14Awfully disappointing results. I was really hoping these chips would usher in an age where all new CPU/GPU/APU systems could handle multitasking well and at least make games playable. Not so I guess.


    It is an attempt, but bear in mind they just released fusion last year and these new e-350's started being sold by OEMs as HTPC combo's or netbooks just earlier this year. 30 FPS for WoW is actually great... it's an MMORPG, you don't need to be tipping >60 so you can hit that headshot. The e-350 can bitstream -- something the atom quite simply stinks at --and play at decent FPS at low/medium settings that are far more playable than what atom alone can offer and better and cheaper than an atom/ion combination.

    Forget bulldozer for a second. This fusion tech has way more potential and brings more to the table for a much larger base of consumers. If you're looking for enthusiast, 1 hour battery life 60FPS modern title games then you need look elsewhere. This product simply isn't made for nor ever advertised to do that. It's in mini-ITX format, and that alone should tell you everything you need to know.
  • 1 Hide
    Wisecracker , April 8, 2011 1:51 PM
    I don't really understand why Brazos gets 'bumped-up' in class from netbook to notebook --- and then 'panned' as insufficient. Especially when 'Llano-mobile' is being shipped to OEMs.

    And when you have to 'explain' yourself in your conclusion --- that's pretty sad.
  • -3 Hide
    stingstang , April 8, 2011 2:36 PM
    What? AMD disappoints again in the note/netbook market? What....But...How...
    "The NV51B-series employs two APUs: Zacate and Ontario."
    Oh, Canada. No wonder.
Display more comments