Hot Contraband: P4 With 3.6 GHz

Comparison Of All P4 CPUs

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Intel P4 CoresWillametteNorthwoodNorthwood "A"Prescott
Clock Speed1.3 - 2.0 GHz1.4 - 2.6 GHz2.26 - 3.60 GHz3.60 GHz - 5.xx GHz
FSB clock100 MHz100 MHz133 MHz166 MHz
FSB speedQuad-Pumped (400 MHz)Quad-Pumped (400 MHz)Quad-Pumped (533 MHz)Quad-Pumped (666 MHz)
L1-Cache (Trace)12 K µ-Ops12 K µ-Ops12 K µ-Ops?
L1-Cache (Data)8 kB8 kB8 kB?
L2-Cache (Data)256 kB512 kB512 kB512 kB
Process0.18 µm0.13 µm0.13 µm0.09 µm
CPU Die Size217 mm2146 mm2146 mm2?
Number of Gates42 Million55 Million55 Million?
Gates per size193,548 gates/mm²376,712 gates/mm²376,712 gates/mm²?
CPU Core voltage1.75 V1.50 V1.50 V - 1.525 V1.25 V
Amperage max.43 A41.7 A44.9 A?
Power consumption max.75.3 Watt62.6 Watt68.4 Watt?
Hyperthreadingnonoyes, from 3.06 GHzyes

Basis For Discussion: Memory Performance AMD Vs. Intel

The two benchmark suites SiSoft Memory and PC Mark 2002 Memory give clues to the performance of the memory interface. For this, we compared the Pentium 4/2533 with the fastest Athlon XP 2600+ - each on different but comparable platforms equipped with identical peripherals.

The SiSoft test shows that DDR333 memory is marginally slower than 400 MHz RDRAM memory (PC800). The outcome is different with the PC Mark 2002: here, the P4's DDR platform even outstrips the RDRAM system. As before, the RDRAM platform with its 533 MHz memory clock speed is still unmatched, this system winning by a length in every test. Even with the fastest DDR333 memory (CL2), the AMD Athlon XP 2600+ doesn't quite reach the performance of an optimally configured DDR-based P4 system.

  • youssef 2010
    Now we can see that the ones who expected intel to exceed 4 GHz were completely wrong,as Intel failed to cool its 3.8GHz processor sufficiently
    Reply