Network Storage: Three NAS Units Rounded Up
Test Environment
As usual, we skip installation of Jumbo Frames in our testing because, although they enable higher data-transfer rates, they can also cause problems due to an absence of standards governing their implementation. Otherwise, we ran benchmarks using our standard reference platform. The following table provide details about hardware components involved.
System Hardware | |
---|---|
Intel Platform | Asus P5E3 Deluxe, Rev.1.03G |
Row 1 - Cell 0 | Intel X38, BIOS: 0810 (02/11/2007) |
CPU | Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 (65 nm Conroe core) @2.26 GHz |
RAM | 2x 1024MB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600 |
eSATA-Controller | JMicron JMB363 |
System Hard Disk | Seagate Barracuda 7200.9, 160 GB |
Row 6 - Cell 0 | 7,200 RPM, SATA/300, 8 MB Cache |
Test Hard Disk | Samsung Spinpoint HD321KJ, 320 GB |
Row 8 - Cell 0 | 7,200 RPM, SATA/300, 16 MB Cache |
DVD-ROM | Samsung SH-D163A , SATA150 |
Graphics Card | Gigabyte Radeon HD 3850 GV-RX385512H |
Row 11 - Cell 0 | GPU: 670 MHz |
Row 12 - Cell 0 | RAM: 512 MB DDR3 (830 MHz, 256 Bit) |
Network Interface | Marvell Yukon 88E8056 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller |
Sound Card | Integrated |
Power Supply | Coolermaster RS-850-EMBA, ATX 12V V2.2, 850 W |
Row 16 - Cell 0 | Row 16 - Cell 1 |
System Software & Drivers | |
OS | Windows Vista Enterprise SP1 |
DirectX 10 | DirectX 10 (Vista-Standard) |
DirectX 9 | Version: April 2007 |
Graphics Drivers | AMD Radeon Version 7.12 |
Network Drivers | 9.0.32.3 (Vista-Standard) |
Intel Chipset Driver | Version 6.9.1.1001 (20/02/2008) |
JMicron Chipset Driver | Version 1.17.15.0 (24/03/2007) |
Intel NAS Performance Toolkit
We used the Intel NAS Performance Toolkit. You'll find a write-up of these benchmarks in our recent story on Hacking the HP EX470/475 MediaSmart Servers, where the individual tests and their results are discussed.
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Current page: Test Environment
Prev Page Co-World Sharedisk Pro 400 Next Page Benchmark Results: Multimedia-
cknobman If you want something simple to share data at home I cant figure out why anyone would buy a cheap NAS that gives less than 15 mbps or something outrageous costing over $700. Why not build your own using low power cpu that would perform much better than the cheap NAS devices and still come in hundreds of dollars less than the overpriced NAS devices?Reply -
yourhighness cknobmanIf you want something simple to share data at home I cant figure out why anyone would buy a cheap NAS that gives less than 15 mbps or something outrageous costing over $700. Why not build your own using low power cpu that would perform much better than the cheap NAS devices and still come in hundreds of dollars less than the overpriced NAS devices?Reply
THIS
-
yourhighness More on this Topic....?Reply
Hitting the link for the last page just gives me a blank pop-up box....
Using Chrome. -
yourhighness yourhighnessMore on this Topic....?Hitting the link for the last page just gives me a blank pop-up box....Using Chrome.Grabbing the link from the drop down works fine, but from the conclusion page going to the next page is broken.Reply -
theJ yourhighnessMore on this Topic....?Hitting the link for the last page just gives me a blank pop-up box....Using Chrome.Reply
That's all it is. More ads so they can pay the bills. -
If you want to build your own rock-solid RAID NAS, and do so with cheap old hardware, check out my guide on building a Linux RAID-5 NAS. I wrote this guide so even someone who has never worked with Linux before can get it up and running, and maintain it, very easily! Hope this helps someone out there!Reply
Go to my site at: http://cobraftp.serveftp.com and click on Linux.. then at the top is the PDF, which is labeled "Linux RAID-5 How-to Guide" -
how did you exclude the new Readynas NVX? seems kinda silly without that leader in both functionality and performance involvedReply