And the Aliens: Colonial Marines drama continues. Many critics are now pointing out that the final product released last week looks nothing like the game that was demonstrated at E3 2011. The demo "wowed" journalists, retailers and gamers alike, and screenshots showcased a game that not only looked action-packed, but visually stunning, making us want more.
But now that critics and disgruntled gamers are looking back, there's questions as to how a game could get progressively worse over time. Theoretically you'd think a developing game would only improve over time. Gameplay would be more refined, AI calculations tightened, visuals sharpened and deepened. The object is to start with nothing and end up with an immersive world that grabs you by the eyeballs and never lets go.
So what happened between now and the awesome walkthrough shown at E3 2011? There's speculation that A:CM was never the game as advertised. It was all a big lie to cover up the mess that would eventually be wrapped up in a box and a huge media bow in 2013. As an example, the entire sequence where the player struggles to survive in a collapsing bridge in space never happens in the campaign. The Alien Queen fighting the Power Loader scene also isn't present.
"Gearbox called it a 'vertical slice' showcasing the gameplay sequences that'd appear throughout the campaign. Only trouble is, none of the gameplay shown ever happens, and we were never told it was just conceptual," said Destructoid. "I played the entire campaign waiting for things shown in the walkthrough and got none of them. The only gameplay retained is one siege room, and even that plays out 95-percent differently."
When comparing screens from the demo to the finished product, the current lack of environment detail, dated lighting effects and linear-to-a-fault gameplay become horribly apparent, the report said. It's noted that like Hollywood movie trailers, screenshots and video gameplay can be doctored to better promote the product: the industry's "white lie" or "bullshots". This is really no different than any other product shot in a magazine or TV ad that dresses up the product to be more than it is.
But the contrast between demo and final product is more than a touch-up. That said, it is possible Gearbox used an entirely different, more advanced engine in the demo and screens that was for some reason scrapped in favor of a weaker game engine.
"Pitchford's act of deception goes beyond being a white lie," Destructoid said. "He earned fan trust and admiration through manipulation. Not only at press events, but also Gearbox's Community Day where the same demo was shown and presented in the same light of being indicative of the final game."
Has A:CM passed into the realm of false advertising? Sure, that golden stream of beer slowly pouring into the glass of ice on TV sure looks tasty -- you may even be inclined to jump in the car and purchase a case (or keg) right then and there. But you know it's all about lighting and photography. The same is true with movie trailers that take bits of scenery and seemingly create a mini-movie. In the end, you get what you see in both cases.
But that doesn't seem to be the case with A:CM. Just based on feedback and media comparisons alone, there's indication that Gearbox and Sega sold gamers a 2013 Porsche Boxster, but slipped a 1953 Reliant Regal into the box instead, knowing full well the product cannot be returned.
"By knowingly deceiving its fans, Gearbox has gone from being a company worth celebrating to a developer that plays dirtier than the big publishers that we so often damn for sleazy marketing campaigns and excessive pre-order programs," Destructoid said.
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Shame on you Gearbox ^ _ ^ Im glad I never bought into the hypeReply
Who pours beer into a glass full of ice? You're a weird dude, Kevin.Reply
Shame on someone for putting ice in their beer...........Reply
fulleWho pours beer into a glass full of ice? You're a weird dude, Kevin.Reply
don't forget the straw.
don't forget the straw............Thats Funny!!!!1Reply
Yuk, greedy bastards :(Reply
fulleWho pours beer into a glass full of ice? You're a weird dude, Kevin.teaserShame on someone for putting ice in their beer...........Reply
If I had to drink beer, I'd drink it from a glass full of ice, that way there would be less of it and the icy cold would numb my taste buds.
As for the game, that's why you should never preorder anything.
I think "glass of ice" was to mean "glass made of ice," not "glass full of ice." Iced beer is just silly. I mean, so is a glass made of ice, but not quite as much as iced beer.Reply
Could be wrong, though.
Glasses made of ice sounds pretty damn cool to me. No more waste. Makes you drink faster. Slam it before it melts! I think i'm on to something.Reply
I have ice glass molds in my freezer right now, also ice shot glass molds too. I like to drink.Reply
No glass to clean....no empties to return.
On topic though, has GB or Sega officially made any kind of response?