Google May Be Developing Hi-Res Chromebook In-House

13

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • sacre
    Cool

    When Apple released that whole "Retina display" I actually found that to be amazing. Having that insanely high resolution on a display makes a hell of a difference. No need for Antialiasing.

    Calm down fanboys im not saying Apple invented this. Im just saying its an awesome feature and I think thats where we should be heading (faster).

    Super high resolutions on monitors... mmmmm... the detail...color... mmm
    Reply
  • theclash150
    2560 x 1700 is quite the interesting screen resolution.
    Reply
  • plznote
    NexusChromebook?
    Reply
  • nukemaster
    theclash1502560 x 1700 is quite the interesting screen resolution.I think for computer work, I like it much better that way then the more wide screen 16:9 ratio.
    Reply
  • JOSHSKORN
    Just develop a ChromeTop already. Plug your phone into a Desktop Monitor and you have a ChromeTop where you can utilize your favorite Logitech or whatever keyboard/mice.
    Reply
  • susyque747
    I like my Gmail but the rest of cloud can kiss my clit, I'll take a Mac Air instead.
    Reply
  • susyque747
    If I can wipe their cloud OS off and install Ubuntu then I'm interested.
    Reply
  • thillntn
    looks like this thing uses a barrel jack power adapter????how bout wireless charging or something google :) ?
    Reply
  • boiler1990
    The only issue I have with the Chromebooks is that I can't do what I need to do on them. Otherwise I'd be all over this.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    nukemasterI think for computer work, I like it much better that way then the more wide screen 16:9 ratio.16:9 does feel somewhat awkward for most stuff aside from video. I'm using one in portrait mode for reading/coding, takes a while to get used to having almost two pages worth of stuff vertically. 16:10 isn't a whole lot different but it usually looks like a more natural fit for conventional desktop applications.

    2560x1700 is roughly 3:2... 16:10.6, so slightly square-er than 16:10 still.
    Reply