Crytek Wants to Transition to be Completely F2P

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Contributor

Catherine Cai was a freelance news writer for Tom's Hardware. She covered a variety of tech industry news, ranging from PC components to PC and console gaming.

  • volkov956
    Then u wont have any of my money or time is all i can say
    Reply
  • axelb
    I kinda like it, as long as we don't need to spend more money than on a retail game to be geared up enough to compete with everyone, it seems fine! What people tend to forget when they play a Free2Play game is the money developers need, that's why a pay-to-win isn't that bad.
    Reply
  • kcorp2003
    volkov956Then u wont have any of my money or time is all i can say
    the entire industry is moving towards this system in 10 years time. what will you do then?
    Reply
  • Estix
    Here's the thing - "Free To Play" always implies "No Single Player"

    Crytek's games have, in my opinion, had great single-player and mediocre multiplayer.

    Transitioning to F2P means they won't be investing resources into single-player, and the quality of the games will suffer, I believe.
    Reply
  • s3anister
    F2P... Now there's something I'm not looking forward to at all.

    I'd much rather buy my game complete than have to constantly shell out $5-10 for features and add-ons that should have been there in the first place. I literally can not think of anything more annoying than to have to stop pre- or mid-game and use real money to buy weapons or maps to use.
    Reply
  • s3anister
    alvasummers20pcwhat Deborah responded I'm taken by surprise that a mom able to profit $6656 in one month on the computer. have you seen this page http://Bing30.com
    Yeah your mom made a profit of $6656 but believe me it wasn't from that kind of website ;)
    Reply
  • deftonian
    That will actually hurt my wallet more. Thing to remember is that PC games usually go on dirt cheap sales after about a year of release. I usually only pay $5 or more and RARELY buy a game on release. With F2P model, it doesn't matter how old the game is, they will definitely get more than $5 from you by the time you buy certain items within the game just to play on level with everyone else. They win in the long run. It sucks but I'll just have to take it because I wont stop playing video games.

    On the other hand, it will be nice to have a F2P model for those games I just want to try out. This gives me an opportunity to play so many more games and if I dont like it, dont buy any of the items. We win on that front.

    It's a give / take model.
    Reply
  • fkr
    free to play is a good model implemented poorly.

    f2p will stop piracy, this has to be good and if everybody is right it should drive down the price of games.

    and as for implementing f2p they need to set up tiered based servers so the big spenders can play against each other and not have an advantage against others.

    I also like the idea of games where i can pay 3 bucks a month to play, maybe more for the first month or 2 to get some things more quickly but after that a maintenance fee of 3 bucks is fair.

    Reply
  • The-Darkening
    s3anisterYeah your mom made a profit of $6656 but believe me it wasn't from that kind of website
    Don't quote that shit, please.
    Reply
  • Adam7283
    This has been around for a while. Called demos.
    Reply