Skip to main content

Asus, Nvidia Intro First Windows RT Tablet on Video

At a press conference on Monday led by Asus Chairman Jonney Shih, both Asus and Nvidia introduced the world's first Windows RT consumer device: essentially a Windows 8-based 10.1-inch convertible tablet running on an ARM-based quad-core Tegra 3 SoC.

So far pricing and availability is unknown, but Microsoft is expected to launch Windows 8 in October at the least -- Windows RT may arrive in the same timeframe or sometimes thereafter. An Android-based Transformer Prime with similar specs currently costs around $499 and the optional keyboard dock for around $99.

"The tablet will fulfill Microsoft’s vision to deliver a no-compromise, touch-first Windows experience," Nvidia said in a bog. "Nvidia and Asus have been working very closely with Microsoft to ensure that the Windows Metro interface runs beautifully on Windows RT systems powered by Tegra3."

Additional reports have stated that the tablet is called "Asus Tablet 600" and shown running Windows RT Tablet Preview edition during the press conference. It weighs 520 grams and measures just 8.35-mm thick, and features a rear-facing 8MP camera with LED flash, a front-facing 2MP camera, 2 GB of RAM, 32 GB of internal storage, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 4.0 connectivity, a 1366 x 768 IPS IPS+display, a digital compass and NFC technology.

Like the Asus Transformer Prime, it will have an optional keyboard dock sold separately. The dock will have a trackpad and integrated battery.

"It’s already clear that consumers want a touch-friendly, mobile device with extremely long battery life," Nvidia said. "Tegra-powered Windows RT devices like Asus’s Windows RT tablet will be thin and light, silent with no fan, and able to deliver great performance with true multi-tasking). Plus, they’ll offer days of battery life."

Expect actual pricing and release details later this year.

  • eh, disgusting. windows 8 should be for non-touch PC's.
    Reply
  • nocteratus
    ARM processor should be more affordable than intel processor.
    Reply
  • erunion
    This form factor with an x86 chip and real windows, please.
    Reply
  • CaedenV
    throw in an Atom CPU and I'll be all over that like a fly on poop!
    I have been using win8 on my little ASUS MT101T, and it is AWESOME (granted, not so awesome on the desktop platform, but that is not the point). The latest win8 release runs much faster (though the setup time was much longer, and the first hour was nearly unusable while everything was syncing with various online services... but after that it is very slick), improved my battery life by an hour or more, the touch finally works flawlessly (first version I could only use the touch screen like a mouse, and I could not get charms to work. second version was better, but touch would revert to mouse mode after sleep, but charms and multi touch worked finally. Now it all works right and I can use it in touch or key/mouse mode with no problem on either interface.).
    My only complaint is in the graphics department (but it is an old Atom... so what do you expect?). Throw in a better gpu, more efficient cpu, and a monitor that does not have to run in stretch mode to work right and I will be all over it in a heartbeat.

    Win8 is not worth upgrading to for the desktop, but for small netbooks and tablets it is really something wonderful. And if it runs this snappy on a 3 year old netbook (or rather a netbook using 3 year old parts), then I bet it will be much better on something more modern.
    Reply
  • jprahman
    "Nvidia said in a bog."

    Doesn't anyone take the time to proof read this stuff. I know that it's petty to scoff about such issues. but it is so common on this site that I think it is worth mentioning. It really doesn't take much effort to spot these kind of mistakes, just basic misspellings that any middle/high school student could find. This is especially baffling because this is supposed to be professionally written material.
    Reply
  • jojesa
    Now that is a multi-function device. I have not get a tablet yet because they're just toys.
    I would buy one of these.
    Reply
  • ukee1593
    I too would prefer to see this with an x86 class processor too ... but stuff Intel ATOM

    My dream tablet PC would be as follows:

    CPU: Either a High-End AMD Brazos (E-450) OR a low end, single module (Dual Core) AMD Trinity such as the A6-4455M
    DISPLAY: 12 inch IPS panel (I find 10 inch too small) with 2560 x 1440 resolution
    and a keyboard dock like the ASUS Transformer

    WINDOWS 7 Dual Boot with ICS Android (Android for quick boot/checking emails via touch-screen, Windows 7 for real work)
    Reply
  • jerm1027
    Windows 8 looks interesting, but Windows 8 RT is doomed for failure. First off, it has NONE of the benefits from a traditional Windows installation; it kills software compatability, doesn't include explorer.exe, IE10 didn't have flash in consumer preview, and the boot-loader is locked and requires Verisign signatures. From a technical stand-point it's already a nightmare. Now, in addition it's going to be competing with Android, with some of the higher-end devices featuring an Ubuntu environment when docked, and will also be cheaper to produce (since both Android and Ubuntu are free). There is also the merging between iOS and Mac OS X. Windows 8's only chance for success is in the x86 realm, but with MS pushing Metro so hard and making traditional non-Metro app development a pain, Mac OS X and Linux are already starting to gain traction. Metro is an interesting, but unnecessary redundency in mobile computing, and MS is shooting itself in the foot by pushing Metro so hard essentially forcing it upon it's user-base. Metro should be introduced as an optional feature, not shoved down our throats, especially with fierce competition from Google and Apple.
    Reply
  • lostgemini
    "I know that it's petty to scoff about such issues. but it is so common on this site that I think it is worth mentioning."

    No capital letter after a full stop. You should not start a sentence with but. If it was supposed to be a comma then that's still a mistake.

    "It really doesn't take much effort to spot these kind of mistakes"

    Kind should be plural.

    If you are going to be a dick about spelling and grammar at least get it right yourself.
    Reply
  • doive1231
    nvidia proving that tablets can be used anywhere, especially the bog.
    Reply