Alibaba Unveils Open Source RISC-V CPU Amid US-China Trade War

(Image credit: Shutterstock)
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Lucian Armasu is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He covers software news and the issues surrounding privacy and security.

  • bit_user
    Lucian, you're slipping! Get it together, man. You're one of my favorite tech reporters.

    Alibaba Unveils Open Source RISC-V CPU
    I'm sure that's not what they announced, but the Nikkei article doesn't get it exactly right, either. Certainly, their CPU design is a proprietary, closed-source implementation of the open-source RISC-V ISA. Massive difference.

    The companies that have already licensed the Armv8 ISA from Arm should also be able to design their own processors on top of the ISA for a long time,
    No, it shouldn't be a blanket-license. I'm pretty sure the license is tied to a specific silicon implementation.

    However, you also need support and software packages from ARM. For instance firmware, microcode, device drivers, GPU libraries, etc. These services were abrupt cut off, when the US first banned US businesses from working with them. Then, it got backed off to 90 day sunset (though I don't know if that's still where it stands). But, that surely got Huawei's attention!

    RISC-V offers other significant advantages over Arm
    And first among these should be no royalty payments!

    Nvidia has also started to design its own RISC-V microcontroller for GeForce graphics cards,
    Or, in a more recent (and interesting) project:

    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-msm-inference-chip,39780.html
    I remembered reading it, but it's also the 3rd hit I get, when searching the site for RISC-V!
    Reply
  • bit_user
    BTW, some details are here: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Alibaba-RISC-V-16-Core-2.5GHz
    Interestingly, they say they actually do plan on open-sourcing some parts of the design. I wonder if that'll just be some I/O blocks, like PCIe or memory controllers.
    Reply